Boston.com/Health BLOG: White Coat Notes

Cancer screening can be improved with updated family histories

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

07/13/2011 10:23 AM
    • E-mail
    • E-mail this article

      Invalid E-mail address
      Invalid E-mail address

      Sending your article

      Your article has been sent.

The next time you head to your doctor’s office for a check-up, make sure to reveal whether any close family members developed cancer since your last visit. You might need to get certain screening tests earlier than the recommended time -- and your doctor might not know to make a referral unless you update your family history.

A study involving 27,000 patients published in the Journal of the American Medical Association yesterday found a significant percentage of those ages 30 to 50 had changes in their family medical histories that would qualify them to, say, have a colonoscopy before the typical recommended age of 50 or to have breast MRI screening -- more sensitive to picking up tumors -- instead of mammograms.

The researchers from the Massachusetts General Hospital and other institutions found that at age 30, some two percent of participants met the criteria for early colonoscopy based on their family history of colon cancer which rose to seven percent by age 50. For breast cancer, about seven percent of the women qualified for MRI at age 30 based on family history and other factors; by age 50, more than 11 percent qualified.

“Family histories change significantly between the ages of 30 and 50 years,” wrote the researchers. “We therefore recommend that family history should be updated at least every 5 to 10 years to appropriately inform recommendations for cancer screening.”

In an editorial accompanying the study Dr. Louise Acheson, a family physician and oncologist at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, wondered whether updated family histories might led to delayed cancer screenings for those without a particular cancer in their family. “It is possible that, if family history of cancer and breast cancer risk status were reliably updated during the decade from ages 40 to 50 years, many lower-risk women in that age group, as in England, might forgo mammography screening.”

    • E-mail
    • E-mail this article

      Invalid E-mail address
      Invalid E-mail address

      Sending your article

      Your article has been sent.

LOG IN TO COMMENT

Existing users
E-mail:
Password:
New users
Please take a minute to register. After you register and pick a screen name, you can publish your comments everywhere on the site. Posting Policy.



TRUSTe Certified Privacy

about the blog

Daily Dose gives you the latest consumer health news and advice from Boston-area experts. Deborah Kotz is a former reporter for US News and World Report. Write her at dailydose@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter at @debkotz2.

health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
Follow us on Facebook
archives
Health Events
health resources

Be Well Boston on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for twitter.com to feed in the latest...
contributors
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar
other health blogs