Mass. high court rules marijuana dealing charge is valid even when alleged dealer only possesses a small amount
Jeff Barnard/AP
The state’s highest court has ruled that people can be charged with possession with intent to distribute marijuana even if they were caught with less than an ounce of the substance, despite the decriminalization of simple possession of such small amounts.
The Supreme Judicial Court said a 2008 referendum that changed possessing less than an ounce from a criminal offense to a civil offense had no effect on the separate law that makes it a crime to possess marijuana with the intent to distribute it.
“We conclude that the passage of [the referendum] did not repeal the offense of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute [...] where the amount of marijuana possessed is one ounce or less,” Chief Justice Roderick Ireland wrote in today’s opinion.
Shawn M. Keefner faced the possession with intent to distribute charge after police in Great Barrington responded on May 23, 2010, to a complaint from a woman who said her daughter and others were smoking marijuana. Police found six people, including Keefner, sitting on the front porch. They searched Keefner and allegedly found three sandwich bags of marijuana, weighing a total of 6 grams, or less than a quarter of an ounce, the court said.
Keefner argued that the possession with intent to distribute charge had been invalidated by the decriminalization of the simple possession law. A District Court judge agreed, but prosecutors appealed.
The court said that the referendum “did not expressly repeal” the possession with intent to distribute law. “Nor is there any clear implication of a repeal,” the court said.
“The [referendum law], insofar as it relates to the simple possession statute, only applies to a small amount (one ounce or less) of marijuana. In contrast, the crime of posssession with intent to distribute applies to any amount of marijuana if the intent is to distribute it (as opposed to personal use),” the court said.
On the beat

Columnist
Brian McGrory writes about Curt Schilling's past statements about small government and his current woes with his struggling video game company. Read more |
Recent posts
- Parishioners of closed Catholic churches in Greater Boston vow to fight Vatican’s denial of their appeal
- Body of missing Cambridge man found in water
- Duxbury home invasion suspect ordered held without bail
- Armenian Heritage Park opens to honor immigrants
- US Airways plane from Paris diverted to Bangor, Maine, with fighter jet escort, after ‘suspicious behavior’ by passenger



Editor's Choice

A pastor's dream, a church in crisis

Out of pain long past, he forges hope
- Ambitious emissions plan called lagging
- Adrian Walker: Stopped for being black
- Science with a beautiful, and complicated, view
- Chairs bring change of pace to Harvard Yard

From Today's Globe
- Adelson won’t seek a casino in Mass.
- Candidates wary as opposition cameras roll
- Cape Wind foe Koch chips in for Romney
- Findings give boost to online classes
- Supreme Judicial Court throws out statements by suspect in fatal Northampton fire

LOCAL BLOGS
Universal Hub
The Chinatown Blog
CommonWealth Magazine
Red Mass Group
Blue Mass Group
Boston 1775
The Berkeley Beacon
The Daily Collegian
The Daily Free Press
The Harvard Crimson
The Heights
The Huntington News
The Suffolk Journal
The Tech
The Tufts Daily








