Nobel Prize in physics has deep roots at Harvard
The Nobel Prize in physics was awarded today for the surprising discovery that the universe’s expansion is speeding up, not slowing down -- a finding that has transformed scientists’ understanding of the universe and has deep roots at Harvard University.
In the runup to the discovery in 1998, the effort to determine the universe’s rate of expansion became a high-stakes race between two rival teams, one based at the University of California, Berkeley and the other an international team with strong local ties. Two of the winners announced early this morning -- Brian Schmidt of the Australian National University and Adam Riess of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore -- were graduate students at Harvard.
It’s in Cambridge where they did their scientific training and got started on the work that would ultimately build to their Nobel, working with Robert Kirshner, a Harvard professor and member of the High-z Supernova Search Team which made the discovery, though he did not share in the prize. Riess and Schmidt will each receive a quarter of the $1.4 million prize, while Saul Perlmutter, an astrophysicist at Berkeley -- and also a Harvard graduate -- will receive half.
“I think it would be great if the Nobel prize could go to entire teams of people, because it’s really a lot of team work that allows these projects to succeed,” Riess said during a press conference. “If you want to know how science is really done and how recognition is doled out -- I think it should be the whole team. I wish that could be true.”
Kirshner, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who advised both students and played a role in the then-shocking discovery that the universe’s expansion was accelerating, said that he had heard from both of them already, and that he hoped to attend the award ceremony.
“This is very good. Now we don’t have to wait anymore. It was a good choice,” Kirshner said in an interview. “I want to go to Stockholm -- I’m keeping December open.”
Since 1929, scientists have known that the universe was expanding, as a result of the Big Bang nearly 14 billion years ago. But astronomers thought that the expansion was slowing down because of gravity, although there was vigorous debate about how fast that was happening. Scientists began to use the brightness of supernovae as a measurement of the rate of expansion. Initial results from the rival team in California in 1996 seemed to square with people’s expectations: the universe’s expansion was slowing down.
“They said the universe looks like it’s slowing down, just the way everybody expected. We thought we’ve worked on supernovae a lot. ... If we only knew how to find the distant ones, we can do that,” Kirshner said. “I said -- the other guys have been working for five years. Brian said we could do this … he said, ‘I could do it in a month.’ It was partly youthful exuberance, but also true, he did have something working in a month.”
Over the course of the research, Schmidt -- who led the team -- moved to Australia and Riess moved to Berkeley. But they continued working together with other team members, on results that they initially thought could not be right.
The supernovae appeared dimmer than expected, suggesting that the universe’s expansion was speeding up, not slowing down.
As a graduate student in the mid-1990s, Riess had written his Ph.D. thesis on devising ways to measure the distance and brightness of exploding stars, called supernovae – to account for whether a star was dim because it was actually that dim, or because it was far away, or because its light was being obscured by dust.
“That was one of the techniques that allowed us to have the confidence in our results, that we weren’t fooled by one of the other effects -- that it was the universe accelerating,” Riess said.
Alan Guth, a physics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that the finding went against the prevailing understanding of the universe.
“It was a big shock,” Guth said. “We did not expect it, and it really has dramatically changed both our view of cosmology and perhaps even more important our understanding-- or the lack of it -- of fundamental physics itself.”
Riess, who played games of “mud football” with some of his rivals on the Perlmutter team in California, said that competition helped move the work forward because it was becoming clear in early 1998 that the rival team had at the same time been finding their own evidence that the universe’s expansion was accelerating.
Riess said many questions remain to be explored, especially to unravel and understand the nature of dark energy, the mysterious energy that has been proposed as the cause for the acceleration and is thought to make up the vast majority of the universe.
Riess, a Red Sox fan from his days in Boston, was asked whether winning the Nobel takes the sting out of the Red Sox not making the playoffs.
“That’s a great question. I spent a lot of years in Boston, so I got to see a lot of collapses,” he said. “I think nothing ever takes the sting out of those.”
Carolyn Y. Johnson can be reached at cjohnson@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @globecarolynyj.About white coat notes
|
White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy. |
Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

- Diseases About.com disease information
- Symptom checker What your symptoms could mean
- Drugs A-Z Side effects, drug interactions, and more
- Lab Test Interpreter What your lab results mean
- Natural Medicine A-Z Safety of herbs, supplements
- Flu.gov Government flu information
- CDC.gov Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Be Well Boston on Twitter
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar







