Michael Dukakis on ACOs: “We tried that, folks. It didn’t work.”

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

11/28/2011 12:55 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

The creation of accountable care organizations or a global payment structure won’t fix the health care system in Massachusetts and make it more affordable, former governor Michael Dukakis told an audience at Harvard last week.

Speaking during the Harvard School of Public Health Voices from the Field series, Dukakis said urging the health care market to fix itself is “a colossal waste of time.”

“If the market doesn’t work you have to regulate,” he said. “R-E-G-U-L-A-T-E. Thoughtfully, responsibly, and with the active involvement of all of the people who provide health care and who are very important to us.”

Dukakis said Governor Deval Patrick today has all of the authority he needs to regulate the health care market. He cautioned that if Patrick submits a bill asking for regulatory power “it might come back with half of his authority stripped from him.”

Here’s an excerpt from the event. See the video above more of Dukakis’s comments, including harsh words for Mitt Romney, his thoughts on what role preventive care should have in the national conversation about health care, and the intersection of public policy and politics:

If we paid a little attention, it might be a good idea, to the experience of other countries around the world who are doing this and who, for some reason, seem to be able to provide rather good health care to their people at half the cost we do -- whatever the siltstone, whether it’s Australian medicare or a multi-payer system in Germany or an essentially privatized system in Switzerland -- every one of them regulates cost, without exception.

What do we do? Come up with this ACO, global payment thing... We’ve done it. ACOs and global payments. What did we used to call them? HMOs and capitation. We tried that, folks. It didn’t work. Why are we doing it again?

Now don’t get me wrong. Nobody loves having to regulate. We had something called the rate-setting commission when I was governor... We treated hospitals as public utilities. They couldn’t raise their rates a nickel unless they went to the rate-setting commission. We certainly didn’t have these huge disparities between what Partners gets and what the BI gets. Wouldn’t allow it. So, we’ve got to get on with the business of regulating costs. And I think the least bureaucratic way to do it, rather than getting into setting elaborate fee schedules and so forth, is essentially to use the authority we have in this state under the state insurance statutes to regulate the rate of increase and the cost of premiums... You’ve got to involve the key players -- providers, consumers, legislators, and so forth -- in the process of developing how we’re going to regulate and then carefully monitoring it so that, in point of fact, it work and works effectively and at the same time make sure that we provide people with excellent health care, which we do in this state.

What I’m worried about is that we’re futzing around with new institutional arrangements, accountable care organizations.

Chelsea Conaboy can be reached at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter @cconaboy.
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

LOG IN TO COMMENT

Existing users
E-mail:
Password:
New users
Please take a minute to register. After you register and pick a screen name, you can publish your comments everywhere on the site. Posting Policy.



TRUSTe Certified Privacy

About white coat notes

White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy.
health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

archives