< Back to front page
Text size
–
+
Making mental movies
The photograph at left comes from an extremely interesting exhibition at, of all places, Harvard Business School. The show, which runs through Oct. 9, has a real mouthful of a name, "The High Art of Photographic Advertising: The 1934 National Alliance of Art and Industry Exhibition." It has nothing to do with the movies, per se, though a fair number of the photographs in it look as though they could be stills from screwball comedies. Partly that's because we've been schooled to think that glamorously dressed, well-off people from the '30s look like refugees from an RKO sound stage. Partly it's because, then no less than now, the look of advertising fed off the look of movies, and vice versa. The two had, and have, a hand-and-glove visual relationship -- or, in this case, hand and elbow-length glove.
This photograph is different. It does look like a movie still, and from a movie you'd definitely want to see. The mood, though, is anything but
screwball. The image has a moneyed atmosphere, all right, but there lurks within it an
unshakable sense of mystery, even menace. Why are those two darkly
dressed women looking off behind and to the side? What about the
not-quite-blank expression on the driver's face -- and is he looking at
the same thing the ladies are? A greater fascination has to do with to a
very subtle (and completely unintentional) bit of cognitive dissonance.
The car and fashions and hair styles clearly belong to the mid-'30s (the
photo is dated c. 1934). Yet the very dramatic, high-contrast lighting
is pure noir. You'd think John Alton was responsible for the set-up. Only Alton was still working in Argentina then, and Hollywood wouldn't start using such lighting schemes for another dozen years. So there's no way this image could be from any existing movie, yet it looks and feels and resonates so much like a movie we make it part of one in our heads.
This is how Hollywood has changed how we see the world -- or at least changed it for those of us who've seen too many movies (which is also to say never enough movies). Hearing a snatch of music or reading a stray paragraph, we don't start composing the rest of the song or working out a novel's plot in our heads. Glimpse the right image, though, and a mental movie can emerge unbidden. It's a collaboration between our imagination and years of movie-watching experience. That woman on the left looks a bit like Carole Lombard, don't you think? Or maybe even Garbo? Forget period, if you like, and go for Gwyneth Paltrow (she needs something to do these days other than picking up after Tony Stark). Whoever. Whatever. You get to choose. It's your head, after all, and your movie.
This is how Hollywood has changed how we see the world -- or at least changed it for those of us who've seen too many movies (which is also to say never enough movies). Hearing a snatch of music or reading a stray paragraph, we don't start composing the rest of the song or working out a novel's plot in our heads. Glimpse the right image, though, and a mental movie can emerge unbidden. It's a collaboration between our imagination and years of movie-watching experience. That woman on the left looks a bit like Carole Lombard, don't you think? Or maybe even Garbo? Forget period, if you like, and go for Gwyneth Paltrow (she needs something to do these days other than picking up after Tony Stark). Whoever. Whatever. You get to choose. It's your head, after all, and your movie.
About Movie nation Movie news, reviews and more.
contributors
Ty Burr is a film critic with The Boston Globe.
Wesley Morris is a film critic with The Boston Globe.
Mark Feeney is an arts writer for The Boston Globe.
Janice Page is movies editor for The Boston Globe.
Tom Russo is a regular correspondent for the Movies section and writes a weekly column on DVD releases.
Video: Movie reviews

loading video... (please wait a moment)

Take 2 reviews and podcast
Look for new reviews by Ty Burr and Wesley Morris at the end of each week in multiple formats.
|







