Culture Desk - News, Reviews, Names & More
< Back to front page Text size +
Art

Is Google Art Project second-rate?

Posted by Sebastian Smee  February 10, 2011 11:25 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

For people who think Google Art Project is stunningly new and world-changingly wonderful (and from the comments thread attached to my Critic's Notebook on the subject, that would seem to be quite a few people), consider checking out the website of a company called Synthescape.

Synthescape, and I quote from their website, "works with museums and galleries to assist them with digitizing collections and exhibitions. We are particularly skilful at high-resolution, multi-perspective imaging of artworks, artefacts, installations, and exhibitions. Our speed and efficiency are unparalleled."

If you want to compare, try the virtual tour of London's Courtauld Gallery that Synthescape developed and links to on its website. It's way better than any of the virtual tours on Google Art Project. Or you might like to look at the interactive website they developed with Tate Modern for that museum's 2008-2009 Mark Rothko exhibition.

"We've been doing this type of work for years now," wrote Sythescape's managing director, Darin Freitag, in a letter to me this morning, "and have always obsessed about image quality, consider that something sacred, strive always for perfection and to be as faithful as possible to the artist's work... "

Freitag went on to write something about the quality of Google's imagery that he would prefer I didn't reproduce, before adding: "That so many critics and directors - persons whom I'd assumed to be discriminating about image quality... - have leapt to their feet to applaud what Google have done - well, I find it all quite perplexing."

It's an interesting perspective, and goes to my point about Google's ability to hype their own adaptations of technology that is already out there, and often in more advanced form than their own. 

A final point about my perspective. I have no doubt Google Art Project will have a big impact, and I have no trouble seeing that it provides a valuable service. My point was twofold: I am underwhelmed by the quality of what it offers. And I think that it's helpful - to balance out the rampant technophilia we all tend to succumb to - to be reminded of things that are fundamental about the experience of art and which, to my mind, Google Art Project, for all its interest, fails to really advance.

 

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About the blog

"Media Remix" is where couch potatoes meet pop culture criticism. What does Honey Boo Boo say about class issues in America ? Is The Real Housewives anti-feminist? Does Lady Gaga empower gay fans, or patronize them? And where'd I put the remote control? If you love knowing about the latest in movies, TV, music and social media - and analyzing the politics of The Apprentice - grab a seat with "Media Remix."

About this blog

Culture Desk is a blog that serves to highlight both local and national stories of interest in the worlds of art, music, movies, TV, theater and more. Most items are written by writers and editors from The Boston Globe arts and culture staff.

Submit a tip to the Culture Desk

Required
archives

A&E video

loading video... (please wait a moment)