THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
Alex Beam

Through the lens of time

By Alex Beam
Globe Staff / September 22, 2009

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

In the late 1960s, the Polaroid Corp. had an interesting idea. The company recruited the world’s best-known photographers, such as Ansel Adams, William Wegman, and Andy Warhol, provided them with free film and studio space, and said: Have a ball. When you are finished, please give us a few prints, which we will include in our corporate collection.

Four decades later, the Polaroid Collection has 16,000 prints by 120 recognized masters: 443 Ansel Adamses, 198 Phillipe Halsmans, 35 Mary Ellen Marks, and so on through Robert Mapplethorpe, Robert Rauschenberg, Inge Morath, and Margaret Bourke-White. It’s not just Polaroids. Some of the pictures, by Bourke-White, Edward Weston, and Dorothea Lange, hung in Polaroid founder Edwin Land’s library. Sotheby’s has chosen 1,300 prints from the collection, valued between $7 million and $11 million, and plans to auction them off next spring.

“Hey, wait a minute!’’ is the widespread reaction of some photographers and former Polaroid employees blindsided by the proposed sale. “I was responsible for accumulating some of this collection,’’ recalls former Polaroid staffer Sam Yanes. “I thought we didn’t buy these photographs, we just bought the right to use them. I talked to Manfred Heiting and Ted Voss, who also worked on the collection, and they agreed with me, that was the case.’’

“We loaned them our photographs; they don’t legally own them,’’ says Museum School artist and photographer Erica Adams, who wrote a letter to the St. Paul bankruptcy judge who OK’d the Sotheby’s sale. “I have the paperwork.’’

How did we get here? The original Polaroid company went bankrupt in 2002. A group of Minnesota-based investors bought its assets, including the photo collection. Then they declared bankruptcy. This summer their creditors asked a judge if they could sell the photos, and the judge approved. He ruled, and Sotheby’s asserts, that the creditors have “free and clear’’ ownership of the collection.

If the photographers wanted to claim their work, he said, they should have acted in 2002, during the first bankruptcy proceedings. “That is when the contractual rights may have been voided,’’ says photography critic Allan Coleman, who has been bird-dogging the fate of the collection on his blog PhotoCritic International.

Rough justice, to be sure. The facts behind the case are devilishly complex. Polaroid signed many different agreements with many different photographers. For instance, Ansel Adams and Land experimented with film starting in the 1940s, and Adams gave his work outright to the company. On the other hand, many photographers signed an agreement which stipulated that “Collection images are exclusively used for exhibition and editorial (non-commercial) purposes with Polaroid retaining all rights.’’

At various times during Polaroid’s roiled recent history, staffers approached Harvard’s Fogg Museum and the Whitney Museum in New York, seeking a home for the photos. One roadblock was money. It costs an estimated $200,000 a year just to warehouse the photos in Somerville. And stiffed creditors couldn’t be expected to overlook the multimillion-dollar value of the collection.

Many photographers are unaware of the pending sale, and among those in the know, reaction is mixed. “I would assume they could sell the entire collection without having to ask my permission,’’ says Joel Meyerowitz, five of whose works are with Polaroid. “I never heard anything from Polaroid at any time about my work,’’ says John Divola, a photographer who teaches at the University of California at Riverside. “My understanding was that they were taking prints for their collection. It was never represented to me that these prints would be put on the market to compete with my other work.’’

Photographer John Reuter, who lives in Longmeadow, has about a hundred prints in the portion of the collection that Sotheby’s chose not to sell. “There are some really nice pieces in there,’’ he says. “I am going to try and get them back.’’

“I am disappointed that it has come to this,’’ says William Turnage, who manages the Ansel Adams Trust. “I suspect that Dr. Land is rolling over in his grave.’’

Alex Beam is a Globe columnist. His e-dress is beam@globe.com.

Latest Entertainment Twitters

Get breaking entertainment news, gossip, and the latest from Boston Globe critics and Boston.com A&E staff.