Where have 'Today' show viewers gone?
Langelier felt there was a perception that Lauer was ‘‘king’’ and others on the show aren’t equal to him. Lyle Nelson, 40, a salesman from Avondale, Ariz., said Lauer was ‘‘not someone I'd like to have a beer with.’’
‘‘There is something about Matt Lauer, whether or not he was the reason for Curry’s firing, that has changed and I do not like watching the show anymore,’’ said John Friia, a 20-year-old aspiring journalist from Malverne, N.Y.
Fortunately for NBC, viewers don’t seem to be taking out their unhappiness on Guthrie.
Producers often say that viewing decisions for morning television can be intensely personal, since people are essentially inviting these personalities into their homes at an intimate time of day when they were getting ready for work. Feeling a part of the TV ‘‘family’’ they see on air is part of it, and sometimes the reasoning seems strange. Nelson said, for example, that he didn’t like the couch on ‘‘Today’’ because it looked uncomfortable.
‘‘In today’s doom and gloom news programs, the ‘Today’ show gave me a lift to get my day started,’’ said Taren Robin, 48, from Paris, Ky. ‘‘I don’t get that lift anymore, and I am in mourning over the fact. I haven’t found anything I like better to take its place.’’
At least one-third of people who responded to a Twitter request to discuss the show cited its content for their discontent.
‘‘I used to be a regular ‘Today’ show viewer but got tired of their formula,’’ said Dan Laufer, 35, a sports marketer from Washington, D.C. ‘‘Five minutes of hard news followed by an animal rescue story, the Kardashians and then pop culture or fashion. It’s OK with me — in moderation.’’
Joan Pierce is a 64-year-old retired nurse from Oklahoma City, Okla., who watched ‘‘Today’’ for 40 years. Now she says: ‘‘I don’t care what Lindsay Lohan does.’’
‘‘I was fed up with the lack of actual news reporting, and more intense focus on silly, irrelevant things like women’s fashion or the newest celebrity’s recipe for a dinner I could never find the time or money to cook,’’ said Zach Beale, a 23-year-old college student in Savannah, Ga.
Biting as they may be, at least those complaints offer ‘‘Today’’ the seeds of potential recovery. ‘‘Good Morning America,’’ particularly in its second hour, has an even greater pop culture emphasis. Bell said his show will try to draw a greater contrast with its ABC rival in coming months. A recent ad with Lauer touts the ‘‘informative’’ nature of the show. Curry, who has kept her job with NBC as a hard news reporter, appeared on ‘‘Today’’ during the past month interviewing Libyan President Mohammed Magarief and reporting from Syria.
CBS has already tried to position itself as a newsier alternative in the morning. Because ‘‘Today’’ has a richer history and often twice as many viewers, it would be in better position to reach people who want this.
NBC announced this week that Willie Geist, an engaging and popular member of MSNBC’s ‘‘Morning Joe’’ team, will join ‘‘Today’’ as a co-host of the 9 a.m. hour and occasionally appear earlier.
‘‘What I loved about the show were the hosts, reporters and the stories,’’ said Miriam Sajecki, a marketer from Staten Island, N.Y. who has watched ‘‘Today’’ for more than 20 years. ‘‘It was always delivered in a friendly, engaging and informative manner. Some of that has changed in that I miss the chemistry that was displayed with the prior hosts ... and some of the stories ‘Today’ was known for. It has evolved into forgettable reports without giving me the important news and educational stories.’’
Still, Sajecki is a loyalist. ‘‘I will continue to watch the ‘Today’ show and wake up to it every weekday,’’ she said.
NBC needs devoted fans like Sajecki to turn things around.
It will take some time.