< Back to Front Page Text size +

Presidential politics, "Idol" style

Posted by Joanna Weiss May 9, 2008 01:07 PM

Voters of America, "Idol"-watchers, bear me out on my latest theory. (And listen now, before events make my ideas obsolete.) I'm here to declare that Hillary Clinton is the Carly Smithson of the presidential race.

Think about it: Both are experienced, talented, incredibly hardworking -- to the point that you can see the gears straining as they perform. Both approached their contests with a my-turn sense of entitlement. And yet both have been unable to fully connect with the audience, at least not broadly and consistently. Hillary and Carly are proof that popularity relies on something intangible, uncalculatable.

As for Barack Obama, the analogy isn't so easy this season. David Archuleta comes the closest, in the sense that he's a born-natural talent who likes to peddle hope and inspiration. But Obama doesn't project that dancing-bear sadness. Unlike Young David, he's here by choice.

2 comments so far...
  1. I think I agree with you on the Carly/Hillary comparison. It is an interesting way to look at it.

    Posted by Theresa May 9, 08 02:48 PM
  1. I think you got it exactly right. Carly seemed to have trouble showing a vulnerable side, or any side except the one that said "I'm going to sing the hell out of every song, whether I enjoy it or not." I don't think there's any question that she had one of the strongest voices this season, but something was missing, at least for me. And it feels the same way with Hillary, that you know she's the more experienced candidate, and yet there's something that's missing. Maybe humility?

    Posted by lmd May 12, 08 08:11 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About viewer discretion What we're watching on TV

Contributors

Matthew Gilbert is the Globe's TV critic.
Joanna Weiss is the Globe's pop culture reporter and critic.
archives

browse this blog

by category