![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
What happens to the ribbon of land being created by the depression of the Central Artery may be the most important development decision to face Boston in a generation.
|
A BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL Five days to go 7/26/2002
Flexibility is needed because some criticisms of the draft legislation are
valid. For instance, in creating the Massachusetts Millennium Greenway Trust to
oversee the milelong corridor to be left when the Central
Artery comes down, the draft would allow the trust to acquire
real estate adjacent to the corridor. The object here is to allow small-scale
property changes, not empire building, and the legislation should make that
clear. Similarly, language about limiting public access should be scrapped.
These will be public spaces, and they must remain so.
Resolve is needed because the basic concept - creating in the trust a strong
and independent entity dedicated to making and maintaining a world-class park
system - is the best that can be achieved. Further refinements to guarantee that
the trust operates openly and with a significant public role are warranted. But
the drafters should stoutly resist efforts to dissipate the trust's strength.
For instance, suggestions that neighborhoods such as the North End and
Chinatown should have a veto over the trust's design decisions for nearby
parcels make no sense. Neighborhoods can work through normal channels, including
zoning. They should not have a veto over specific designs any more than
residents of Arlington Street do over the Public Garden or of Seaver Street do
over Franklin Park.
In a perfect world, management of the Greenway might be lodged in a branch of
the Boston Parks Department with a reliable funding source. But questions of
ownership and finance make this politically impractical. A new, single-purpose
entity is the sound alternative.
And the independence of the trust is its greatest strength. The trick is to
give the trust sufficient public accountability without binding it to political
powers in a way that will surely compromise it in the end.
One thing that needs quick resolution is how federal highway regulations can
be negotiated so they don't jeopardize a major funding source for the trust -
the corridor parcels, mostly at the northern and southern ends, slated for
development. Some critics say control of these parcels makes the trust a
development authority rather than a parks agency. But another agency would have
an incentive to maximize the income from the development parcels rather than
concentrate on their compatibility with the parks.
Time is short. But the goal is great.
|
||||||||||||
|
|