![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
What happens to the ribbon of land being created by the depression of the Central Artery may be the most important development decision to face Boston in a generation.
|
A BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL A Greenway fumble 8/2/2002
With the proposed greenway trust in limbo, the Massachusetts Turnpike
Authority will resume the process of picking designers for the milelong string
of parks to be created at street level when the elevated Central
Artery comes down starting next year.
But the Turnpike Authority is a road-building agency, not a city builder. It
is crucial that it augment its urban design capacity, possibly by naming a panel
of internationally known advisers, and that it further strengthen its
relationship with the Boston Redevelopment Authority. These steps would help
overcome doubts and give the authority the credibility it needs to encourage
proposals from teams of the world's leading designers.
In addition, state and city officials need to provide assurance that this
designer selection process will stick.
One criticism of the draft legislation was that it did not require the
proposed trust to honor the first phases of the designer selection process
already undertaken by the Turnpike Authority.
Such uncertainty can be fatal. As William J. Mitchell, dean of MIT's School
of Architecture and Planning, put it yesterday, top designers "want a client
group that is decisive."
The failure of the trust bill provides an opportunity to consider other
options, such as a stronger city role and dedicated funding to assure high
quality.
The idea of a strong, single-purpose agency with adequate public
accountability and not hamstrung by political connections has wide support. The
idea has been discussed in countless neighborhood meetings and legislative
hearings, but when actually proposed in draft form it contained specifics that
should get more airing.
The Legislature's Transportation Committee has scheduled three more hearings
this fall. This will be the time, before next legislative session convenes in
January, to resolve major questions. Should the trust administer only the parks,
a significant number of development parcels as well, or - as Mayor Menino
suggested in an interview this week - only the development parcels adjacent to
parks? Questions of finance, federal approvals, and City Council concurrence
should also be resolved in advance.
A wider circle, including local legislators and the mayor's "completion task
force," needs to be heard. As adversaries with questions they can derail
legislation. As allies they can help produce good governance and world-class
design.
|
||||||||||||
|
|