Text size +

Opening Day has arrived: 14 predictions for 2014

Posted by David D'Onofrio March 31, 2014 12:30 PM

It may not reach 40 degrees today in the city of Boston. It may be difficult to discern whether that's rain or snow falling from the sky. It may feel as though this miserable winter will never end.

But it's opening day, darn it, and so if ever there was a day to look ahead to warmth, to sun, to summer -- today is the day. Especially when the local team is the reigning World Series champion, and when there's reason to think they could be among the elite again.

Sunny days are indeed ahead ... and with that in mind, here are 14 predictions for the 2014 season.

1. The Red Sox will lose more than three games in a row.
Going out on a limb right off the bat, aren't I? Last year a big part of the Red Sox' remarkable consistency was their ability to avoid losing streaks of any length, but there's a reason they were the first team since the 2005 Cardinals to finish the season without losing more than three games in a row. It's really tough to do, enough that it may be the toughest of all the team's 2013 feats to repeat in 2014.

2. The Sox never settle in on a leadoff hitter.
Daniel Nava gets the nod at the top of the order on Monday, presumably taking the spot that would've gone to Shane Victorino if he were healthy. Victorino has experience in the role, as do Grady Sizemore and Dustin Pedroia, while Nava and even a guy like Jonny Gomes can work a count in a way that's compatible with the slot's responsibilities. But ultimately the notion of a leadoff man is overrated, and so the Sox won't settle on one specific guy there if it means compromising what represents the best-composed lineup on a given day.

3. Bradley is the starting center fielder by season's end.
Jackie Bradley was sent to Pawtucket last week after losing the center field competition to Sizemore, but was recalled before the opener because Victorino's hamstring sent him to the disabled list. Regardless of how the roster looks at the beginning, though, the prediction here is that after two seasons completely out of the game followed three seasons in which he hit .234 with a .314 on-base percentage, Sizemore performance and his durability will create an opportunity for Bradley, who will do a better job of proving himself big-league ready this season than he did last.

4. Pedroia is the only Red Sox player in the top 10 of MVP voting.
Last year Boston showed that a team need not have a serious MVP candidate in order to succeed, and whatever level of winning they experience this year it's again likely to come without the presence of a dominant individual. Dustin Pedroia does so many things well that when his team is good and he's playing his game he is among the league's most valuable, but since he won the honor in 2008 he hasn't been seriously considered for the award, and its says here that neither he nor any of his teammates will be this year, either.

5. Ortiz's spring struggles extend into the early season.
David Ortiz's spring essentially began with the DH being struck out by a college pitcher -- and it never really got any better in the Grapefruit League, as he batted .054 with an on-base plus slugging of .287. Sox fans would like to think he'll flip the switch when things count for real, but Ortiz hasn't hit better than .250 in spring training since 2006, and generally speaking he's been a really slow starter over that same span. His Aprils have improved recently, as he hit .405 in 2012 (after hitting .228 in the spring), and .500 last year (after missing all of spring training), but generally speaking he's still a slow starter. And the past month has done nothing to make me expect this year will be different.

6. Middlebrooks, Napoli, and Ortiz combine to hit 90 home runs.
That being said about Ortiz's slow starts, he does typically recover quite nicely. Couple that with the improvements the Red Sox hope Will Middlebrooks has made since this time last year, and with the might of Mike Napoli's bat, and the trio could combine for 90 taters -- something only the Orioles' troika of Chris Davis, Adam Jones, and JJ Hardy did last year in the American League.

7. Uehara gets Cy Young votes.
Koji Uehara will not be as good as he was last year. Heck, it might be decades before another Red Sox reliever is as good as Uehara was last year. But he won't be worse enough to cause worry. Sure, his WHIP last year was a ridiculous 0.565 -- but a year earlier it was a mere 0.639. Opponents might've hit .130 against him last year -- but they hit just .160 against him a year earlier. And, believe it or not, his ratio of strikeouts to walk, at 11.2, was actually down from 14.3 in 2012. Last year was an amazing, sure, but it wasn't necessary a gigantic aberration. So expect him to keep throwing strikes. Expect him to save 40 games. And expect him to show up on Cy Young ballots.

8. Buchholz makes 30 starts.
That's a number Clay Buchholz has never reached. He took the ball 29 times in 2012, and 28 in 2010, though other than that he's never made more than 16 major-league starts in a season. Thinking he'll make 30 starts this season is partially based on a belief that his injury history has to even out at some point, but it's also based on the suggestion that by successfully battling through soreness to pitch Game 4 of the World Series he may have had an epiphany that convinced him he needn't be 100 percent to be effective on the bump.

9. Jon Lester reaches free agency.
As Lester begins the final year of his current deal, the question is what he believes is fair market value, and how significantly that differs from what Red Sox management believes that number is. We compared Lester to some of the other pitchers who've been paid recently, and what's tricky is that Lester's career is just as in line with Anibal Sanchez (five years, $88 million) as it is with Zack Greinke (six years, $159 million). If Lester sees Greinke's deal as closer to market-value, especially after the way money was thrown around in the massive extensions given to Miguel Cabrera and Mike Trout last week, then we shouldn't be surprised if the Sox let him test that belief in free agency.

10. Boston's biggest need at the trade deadline will be an outfielder.
On paper, the Sox are deep in the outfield. Their original opening day roster featured Sizemore, Victorino, Gomes, Nava, and Mike Carp, plus Bradley was waiting in the wings. However, with the health concerns around Victorino and Sizemore, and the unproven potential of Bradley (and Bryce Brentz for that matter), come July 31 this team could well be on the market for a veteran outfielder with the defensive skills to play center field. (Incidentally, don't be surprised, too, if Boston is looking for catching help, too, after going into the season with a pair of 37 year olds behind the plate.)

11. Tigers, Rangers, Nationals, Cardinals, and Dodgers win divisions.
Detroit will get some competition from Kansas City, but ultimately talent wins out in the AL Central. I perpetually underestimate Oakland, so I've probably done so again, but I'll take Texas in an active-but-underwhelming AL West. Washington is the biggest beneficiary of Atlanta's trouble with fielding a healthy rotation, while the Cardinals and Dodgers are both loaded with talent superior to those of their division rivals.

12. Rays and Orioles win the AL wild cards.
Tampa Bay will be excellent, yet again, while Baltimore will fend off the Yankees and the Royals for the second wild card spot. All three of those teams should be good offensively, so whichever team gets the most out of its pitching is the team that'll take the AL's final playoff berth. Michael Pineda could be a game-changer in New York, as Yordano Ventura could be in Kansas City, though I'm buying into what Ubaldo Jimenez did at the end of last year, and what Dan Duquette has proven willing to do with trades over the course of the season. Once Manny Machado's back Baltimore's got the best lineup of the three, too, so I'll take the O's.

13. Red Sox win 93 games, win the AL East.
So much has been written and said about how difficult it will be for the Red Sox to repeat everything that went right for them last year, what's become lost in the conversation is everything that they had to overcome in order to league the majors in run differential, win the division going away, and never face elimination in the postseason. It wasn't an easy road -- and if things go a bit more smoothly this time around, there needn't be as significant a dropoff as some have suggested. They won last year because they were good. And they still are.

14. Tigers beat Cardinals in World Series.
If both stay healthy it's tough to pick against starting pitching the caliber of these two staffs -- so we won't. And once it comes down to a best of seven, Cabrera makes the difference for Detroit like Ortiz did for Boston last October.

10 projections Sox fans would sign for

Posted by David D'Onofrio March 28, 2014 05:00 PM

On the field it hasn't been the most encouraging of spring trainings for the Red Sox, who entered the final days with the worst record of any team, and who haven't exactly been lighting things up individually, either. But soon enough they'll all get a fresh start, with the numbers counting for real as of Monday afternoon.

Nobody knows exactly how things will go, of course, but there's plenty of folks who think they do -- and many of those offer some reason for optimism regarding the local nine. With the help of Fangraphs, here's a look at 10 projections for 2014 that Sox fans would sign for immediately if given the chance:

1. Will Middlebrooks -- 32 HR, 104 RBI (Bill James Handbook)
This seems wildly optimistic at first blush, but the reality is that if Middlebrooks can do enough otherwise to keep himself in the lineup regularly, his career to this point suggests that his power numbers should be close to this level -- if they don't reach it outright. In 660 big-league plate appearances he's got 32 homers and he's knocked home 103 runs. That's basically a full season, so if his growth affords him that much opportunity then David Ortiz-like slugging numbers are not an unreasonable expectation.

2. Dustin Pedroia -- .814 OPS (Bill James Handbook)
A torn thumb muscle limited Pedroia's power last season, when he hit just nine home runs, his lowest total since he was a rookie. To his credit he still managed to hit 42 doubles, but a stronger hand should facilitate something closer to the .823 on-base plus slugging that the second baseman has averaged for his career. And Red Sox fans will gladly take anything resembling a typical Pedroia season.

3. David Ortiz -- .937 OPS (ZiPS)
This would actually signify Ortiz's lowest OPS since 2010, despite the designated hitter coming off his first .300 average, 30 homer, 100 RBIs season since 2007. But, given that he's 38, Sox fans shouldn't be greedy. If he delivers a .937 OPS this season there'll be no complaints.

4. Jonny Gomes and Mike Carp -- 26 HR, 80 RBI combined (Steamer)
In the Red Sox outfield rotation, Daniel Nava is the guy expected to reach base most offense, while Gomes and Carp are there to provide some thump. These projections assume 548 plate appearances between the two of them (they totaled 609 last season), and if they can produce to this degree the Sox should have one of the more productive left fields in the American League this year.

5. Jake Peavy -- 3.31 ERA (Bill James Handbook)
The right-hander posted a 4.04 ERA after being traded to the Sox late last July, and hasn't had an ERA lower than 3.45 since 2008, when he was with the Padres. There's a chance he could deliver better numbers than he did after arriving last summer, and if so Boston would be thrilled to get that level of performance from its No. 4 or 5 starter. So 3.31 is probably a bit overly optimistic.

6. Xander Bogaerts -- .283, 19 HR, 84 RBI (Bill James Handbook)
These numbers would win Bogaerts rookie of the year honors in the American League -- and would instantly make him one of the league's premier offensive shortstops of any age. In fact, the OLIVER projections suggest Bogaerts will finish the season with a team-high total of 3.8 wins above replacement (WAR) -- and if there were still any doubt about the fact he's got a superstar ceiling, there wouldn't be after a year like this.

7. Shane Victorino -- 132 games played (ZiPS)
Given how much the Sox needed to manage his ailments last season, and how issues have already arisen this spring, Victorino's health is second only to Grady Sizemore's in terms of uncertainty. If he plays in 132 games, and factoring in occasional days off, it means he probably only made one (relatively short) trip to the disabled list throughout the course of the season. The Sox would take that.

8. Mike Napoli -- 145 strikeouts (ZIPS)
The first baseman reset the club record by whiffing 187 times last season, so trimming 42 off that total would theoretically lift his numbers across the board. It's an imperfect calculation, but based on the rate at which he walked last season, and his average on balls in play, eliminating 42 strikeouts in 2013 would've added six more free passes and 13 more hits, lifting Napoli's average from .259 to .289. He's unlikely to hit .367 on balls in play again this season, but more contact would still mean good things.

9. Andrew Miller -- 60 innings pitched (Oliver)
Miller's ability to attack left-handed hitters, and to pile up strikeouts, make him a big weapon for the Sox bullpen -- but each of the past two seasons have been spoiled by injury. He's thrown a total of 71 innings since the start of 2012, so if he can successfully throw 60 in 2014 it figures to be significant for the Red Sox setup corps.

10. The five primary starters -- 138 starts (Steamer)
The Red Sox enter the year figuring to rely on veterans Peavy, Jon Lester, John Lackey, Clay Buchholz and Felix Doubront, and if they can get an average of almost 28 starts out of each member of that group, the club should be in good shape come September. That leaves 24 starts for the Sox to introduce minor leaguers to the majors, as they've done over the years, but means the five arms they'd prefer to rotate through have mostly stayed healthy. And healthy pitching usually means healthy results.

What to make of the Red Sox' league-worst spring training record

Posted by David D'Onofrio March 27, 2014 12:00 PM

When the Red Sox awoke Thursday morning, and began preparing for a three-game series with the Twins that'll close out spring training -- and, more importantly, decide the winner of the coveted Chairman's Cup -- they did so with the distinction of owning the worst record (9-16-2) of any major league team during this exhibition season.

Of course, aside from the staking a claim to the title of Kings of Fort Myers, those results don't really count for much. If the Sox win on Monday in Baltimore, the Grapefruit League will be completely forgotten. If Jon Lester is sharp and shuts down the Orioles, there'll be those who'll consider it validation of his status as an ace. If Boston gives its fans any reason for optimism, the region will be flush with visions of a repeat -- after game one of 162.

But just because sentiments are subject to change so quickly, it won't change the fact that the Sox have generally endured an unimpressive spring. And since it's not going away, the question remains: Does it mean anything?

Let's take a look at the past decade to help decide, starting with a look at where those teams that left spring training with baseball's worst record wound up after April, and after the season in its entirety.

(Tied games were left out of the equation.)

ST records.xlsx

The track record here doesn't bode particularly well for the Sox. Last year a highly touted Angels team left camp with the worst record in the game, proceeded to slump its way through the opening month, and finishing a disappointing six games under .500.

In doing so, Los Angeles became the eighth straight team that finished with a losing record after leaving camp as the worst of all major-league teams. The last team to finish with a winning mark after a bottom-of-the-barrel spring was the 2005 Marlins, which also happened to be the only team in this set that reached May 1 with a record better than two games above .500.

As you can see, not one of these teams made the playoffs.

ST records.xlsx

Now, on the flip side, a terrific spring doesn't exactly guarantee success. Twice in the past three years the team with the best record of spring training parlayed that into a mediocre opening month, and ultimately wound up with a losing record.

However, there does seem to be a correlation between a really good spring and an at-least-respectable start to the regular season, as only two of the teams featured on the chart above finished the first month with a losing record. It's less telling in the big picture, though five of the 12 teams (twice there was a tie) since 2004 went on to win at least 92 games. Each of those clubs made the playoffs, while two others won at least 86 contests.

ST records (version 1).xlsb

Of anything suggested by the evidence of the past decade, this might be the most damning of what the Sox' poor spring could mean for their chances of going back-to-back. Since 2004, only one eventual World Series champion finished spring training with a losing record. (The 2011 Cardinals, in all their improbability, were the lone exception.)

What's worth noting, though, is that in all 10 cases the clubs' pre-May 1 record was better than .500 -- and in half of them it was much better than .600. That suggests that all of those teams used the spring to effectively prepare themselves for the season, and so they were able to hit the ground running. Even if the results haven't been there, that's what Boston fans hope the next few weeks will prove that Boston, too, at least used the exhibition season in a similarly productive fashion.

ST records (version 1).xlsb

Three times in this sampling the World Series champion has been the Red Sox, and in each of those years they've followed up a decent spring with an excellent opening month. In fact, 2004, '13, and '07, in that order, represent Boston's three best March/Aprils of the past decade.

More germane to understanding the implications of this year, though, may be the fours seasons in which struggled their way through Florida. Two of those came the year after the Sox won a title, so this will make a third instance for that pattern, and the other two came in seasons that the Sox ultimately missed the playoffs. In the more recent of those examples, a poor spring was scapegoated for the team's 0-6 start, while in 2006 the team followed an atrocious spring by winning six of its first seven before falling to obscurity late.

ST records (version 1).xlsb

And finally, here's a look at John Farrell's track record as far as what its spring record could mean for its start -- his Jays were baseball's best in 2012 -- and ultimately its finish. It's a limited sample size, obviously.

So, what does it all mean? It means that nothing matters until the games count for real, and when the Red Sox are introduced to the crowd at Camden Yards on Monday afternoon, they'll be 0-0, just like the Orioles, and Rays, and Jays, and Yankees. There's a ton of factors that contribute to a spring record, particularly in a year when the team was admittedly slow-playing things with its starting rotation. Everything -- and everything they want to achieve -- is still ahead of them.

But they've got to turn things up when they turn things on.

And for the past eight years at least, that hasn't proven to be the easiest thing to do for the cellar dwellers of the spring.

What is Jon Lester really worth? And are the Red Sox better off waiting him out?

Posted by David D'Onofrio February 26, 2014 11:17 PM

The widespread assumption, given the apparent desire on both sides to make it happen, and maybe even more so given the freshly magical memories of this past October, is that Jon Lester's next contract will come from the Red Sox. Possibly soon, but whether it's in the coming days, coming weeks, or even coming months, most seem to anticipate an agreement will be announced, and the only question is the number dollars and years that'll comprise the terms of the deal.

The lefty himself has promulgated the idea by saying at various times that he wanted to stay, by suggesting that he'd be willing to take a discount to do so, and by recently reiterating that he'd be open to beginning negotiations. As a good union man he's also said he doesn't want to set the market back, but upon hearing that re-signing their staff ace could seemingly be done without a fight, the prevailing belief among Sox fans and followers seems to be that there's no sense letting it get to the point he could leave. The logic says that if Lester is so open to an extension that he would forego free agency, then get it done. Give him five or six years. Give him $100 million. Heck, give him $120 million. Do it. Now.

Or wait -- and potentially save tens of millions of dollars, while maybe also even mitigating the risk of regretting the late years of the deal half a decade from now.

A case can be made that Lester warrants a nine-figure contract. Clayton Kershaw and Homer Bailey both got one this winter, and in doing so became the fifth and sixth hurlers who've signed extensions so large since the middle of the 2012 season. Topped by Kershaw's $215 million whopper, the average haul on those agreements has been roughly $158 million.

But that doesn't depict the entire financial landscape a starting pitcher nowadays encounters as he seeks his next big payday. And it's the rest of the picture that challenges the assumption that the Sox should (and would) be eager to pay Lester big money before they need to do so -- based simply on comparisons of Lester to those who've been paid handsomely for a long-term extension, and comparisons of the southpaw to those who have been forced to find their money as free agents.

Here are those comparisons, for your consideration. First, the six pitchers who've agreed to extensions worth at least $100 million since the start of the 2012 season (click on the chart to enlarge it):

DD_JL.xlsx

Between Kershaw and Lester, there really is no comparison -- nor is there a comparison between Kershaw and any contemporary pitcher at this point, really. Verlander's career numbers are hampered somewhat by his more inconsistent early days, but a better sense of his performance might be reflected in theCy Young votes he's received in six different seasons (compared to Lester's one). Lester's numbers compare more favorably with Cain's, though it's worth noting that when the Giants signed him to his extension he was in the midst of his third sub-3 ERA season in four years, he'd yet to allow an earned run in three postseason starts, and, most importantly, he was almost two and a half years younger than Lester is now.

When the Mariners tacked on five years and $135.5 million to Hernandez's deal before the 2013 season, the prized righty was 26 years old and had posted a 2.85 ERA over the previous four seasons. Hamels is another that Lester's camp could point to, but, again, age is an important consideration -- as it is with Bailey, too.

The Reds righty is the clear outlier in this group, and it remains to be seen if Cincinnati was wise to invest so much capital in a pitcher who hasn't exactly lived up to his perceived potential. But it can be justified by the fact he's two and a half years younger than Lester, with more than 400 fewer professional innings on his arm, and he's on an upward trajectory. The past two years he's basically been as good (or better) than Cain, and per year he'll be paid only $17.5 million. That's not absurd; in fact, if Lester would take a deal paying him $17.5 million annually, the Sox would happily shake his hand and draw up the papers.

Another way to compare the pitchers is to look at the Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) number of each, and thanks to Fangraphs we can do that via the chart below. You'll notice that when he was 26, Lester was right there with the best of the best. At ages 27, 28, and 29, however, he has -- while still better than the baseball-wide average -- been worse than any of the $100 million men who've reached those respective ages. If that signifies a trend, it's not a favorable one for Boston's ace.


Source: FanGraphs -- Clayton Kershaw, Matt Cain, Felix Hernandez

Now, though, let's look at the starting pitchers who have taken their talent to free agency over the past two winters, and see how they compare to Lester. Figuring that he wouldn't probably settle for anything less -- barring a horrific 2014, or an injury -- we'll limit our look to pitchers who have received contracts of four years or more.

Somewhat surprisingly, there's only seven of those, with Ervin Santana still dangling on the open market hoping some suitor will soon bite. Here's how Lester stacks up against those who've been paid after getting to free agency:

DD_JL.xlsx

And here's how his numbers fit in from a FIP perspective:


Source: FanGraphs -- Edwin Jackson, Zack Greinke, Anibal Sanchez

Now, against this cast, Lester looks a bit more appealing. He's clearly better than Jackson, Vargas, and Nolasco, and -- though it's a narrower argument -- he's better than Garza and Jimenez, too. Where FIP showed him trending the wrong way compared to the nine-figure pitchers, among the free agents he's almost every year been somewhere between the middle and top of the pack.

Greinke is the most accomplished of this mix, and accordingly his deal is the outlier of the bunch, both the longest (by a year) and the richest (by a whopping $71 million), so if that's the contract Lester's camp brings with it to the bargaining table then their idea of a hometown discount might well be $140 million. But the fairest comparison of all might be made between Lester and former Double-A teammate Sanchez, who re-signed with the Tigers before the 2013 season despite getting the chance to explore free agency.

Lester is a month older than Sanchez, and three injury-plagued seasons earlier mean Sanchez has thrown 325 fewer big-league innings than Lester. And he got his contract at least a year (maybe two) sooner than Lester will. But, beyond victories, the rest of the career numbers for each hurler are almost identical. So Sanchez's five-year, $88 million pact might be a good starting place for the Sox and Lester.

Another good reference point should be the deal the Cardinals struck with ace Adam Wainwright prior to last season, which kicks in this year -- when Wainwright will turn 33. That agreement will pay him $97.5 million over five years. And even though Wainwright lost 2011 to Tommy John surgery, and was outpitched by Lester in Game 1 of the World Series last October, Wainwright has been one of the three best pitchers in the National League in three of his last four healthy seasons. Lester hasn't been one of the three best pitchers in the American League for even one full season in his career.

So, then, based on comparables, and age, and his body of work, Lester is probably deserving of something in the neighborhood of five years and $85 million-$90 million. That's an average of $17 million-$18 million per year. That's not unreasonable for a team with a payroll like the Red Sox', which will include seven players making at least $12.5 million this season.

In fact, at that number the Sox wouldn't necessarily need Lester to take a discount -- so instead the club could attempt to parlay Lester's willingness to sign into a deal with less of a landmine at the back end. If the Sox can convince Lester to begin the extension immediately, thus overriding the final year of his existing contract, they'd pay him more money than the $13 million they otherwise owe him for 2014, but the club will one year sooner be out from under its commitment to a pitcher who'll then be in his mid-30s.

The other option for the Sox is to play out the season, and see what type of market emerges for Lester. If Max Scherzer doesn't re-up with the Tigers, Lester won't be the best available option, and this past winter suggests a general trepidation about giving megabucks to good-if-not-great pitchers in their 30s, especially one who'd almost certainly also cost a draft pick after being extended a qualifying offer, so Boston could choose to gamble and let the real-world demand directly dictate how much it is willing to spend. It's somewhat odd, and illogical, but the evidence suggests the Sox may pay significantly less by exposing him than they would by essentially bidding against themselves.

It's not a bad way to go for Boston -- except that it only takes one team to swoop in and swipe him from atop your rotation. And when the Yankees are willing to pay Masahiro Tanaka $155 million before he's thrown a pitch in the big leagues, it's hardly beyond the realm of possibility that they'd throw silly money at a left-handed horse who is battle-tested in the AL East and has an impressive postseason pedigree, and who would otherwise be the proven leader of a young staff that projects to soon be loaded with the talented young arms that are on their way.

That'd be a risky way to go if the Sox really do want him to anchor their staff now, and later help steer their future -- but, then again, there's risk to signing him early, too, financially in particular. Actually, they're assuming some risk no matter how they choose to handle this situation.

So maybe we're being a bit presumptuous in assuming that something is imminent.

Who's coming to Fenway this year en route to Cooperstown?

Posted by David D'Onofrio January 24, 2014 04:00 PM


On the baseball calendar, January is in some ways the month that bridges the past with the present -- and even the future. It begins with word of which ex-players will comprise the newest hall of fame class later that summer, and in many hardball cities it ends with the home team hawking tickets. That's the case here in Boston, where -- if you haven't heard -- your game could be the game this year at Fenway Park.

So as it nears its end, and as the Sox put the rest of their single-game admissions up for sale on Saturday, we've decided to roll both of those January staples into a single exercise -- and take a look at whose visit to Fenway this season might merely be a stop on the way to Cooperstown.

In some instances the case has already been made, but in most there's naturally a degree of educated projection, taking into account not only what the player has done to this point but how many years are likely left of his prime, utilizing the wonders of Baseball-Reference and Bill James's similarity scores, and in a few occurrences even basing it on the reputation he's built for himself as a rising prospect.

It's an inexact examination, really -- but anything cast in the context of the hall of fame seems to be these days, and perhaps it'll be worth considering when you're deciding which games you'd like to go to this season. After all, you can't see Greg Maddux pitch or Frank Thomas hit anymore, but you can still bear witness to the likes of Derek Jeter if you haven't before (assuming he's healthy enough come April 22), so here's a glance at the schedule through the lens of which players on each team could offer Fenway's fans a glimpse of greatness:

APRIL
Brewers (April 4-6): Aramis Ramirez is closer than most people might think -- having received MVP votes in five seasons, having won a Hank Aaron award, and having Carlos Beltran, Ernie Banks and Andre Dawson rank as the fourth-, fifth- and sixth-most similar players to him at this point in his career -- but the third baseman doesn't have enough good years in him to get his numbers to that Cooperstown level. Thus, the only real candidate for Milwaukee is Ryan Braun, whose first road games after a 65-game drug suspension will be in Boston, and who will have to prove that six hall-caliber seasons were not solely a byproduct of performance enhancers. If Braun can at age 30 return at a level respectably near where he was prior, and keep his nose clean long enough for voters to start changing their minds about drug cheats, he could have a case for Cooperstown someday. That day is a long, long way off. But it's not impossible to foresee.

Rangers (April 7-9): When Adrian Beltre signed with the Red Sox in 2010, he'd had himself a nice little career. To that point he'd slugged 250 homers, totaled 1,700 hits, knocked in nearly 1,000 runs, and did it all while playing excellent defense -- though he wasn't anything close to being a hall of famer. Four years later, however, he's at least on the cusp. By compiling an OPS of .903 between Boston and Texas, he's elevated his OPS-plus from 105 to 114, which isn't exemplary, except when it's combined with his glove and his entire body of work it gives him the fourth-highest WAR among active players (70.5). He's received MVP votes each of the past four years, and was the runner-up for that award back in 2004, when he hit 48 of his 376 career homers. He'll be 35 in April, but with two or three more seasons approaching the past few, Beltre will be an intriguing candidate.

And he may not be the only big attraction coming with the Rangers. It's far too early to tell, but if 27-year-old Yu Darvish pitches like this into his mid-30s, and if 20-year-old Jurickson Profar (baseball's consensus No. 1 prospect prior to last season) plays up to his advanced billing, they just might merit a conversation, too. As may Prince Fielder -- who's in Eddie Murray's class through age 29 -- despite his postseason difficulties through the years.

Orioles (April 18-21): The Orioles are interesting in that they have four players who, if retained and healthy long-term, could help change the balance of power within the AL East. But at this point it's hard to project any of them as a hall of famer.

The easiest to see in Cooperstown someday is Manny Machado, the infield wizard who hit 51 doubles last year in his age-20 season. However, even with all those two-baggers his OPS-plus was still below-average, at 99, in large part because he worked only 29 walks in 710 plate appearances. His approach needs to improve -- and it should, with age and exposure. Super-prospect Dylan Bundy could be a star, too, but he's recovering from Tommy John surgery and so not only won't he be at Fenway in April, it'll likely be after the All-Star break before he expands on his 1.2 innings of big-league experience.

After two excellent seasons, Adam Jones has emerged as one of the AL's best players, though his career lines up incredibly well with that of ex-Red Sox Reggie Smith, who made five All-Star teams and got MVP votes in three seasons after age 28 -- yet Smith received just 0.7 percent of the vote when eligible in 1988. It's hard to see Jones doing enough from here forward to earn more than 108 times the support Smith received. Matt Wieters, meanwhile, is probably a step behind Jones, the last three seasons suggesting he's a good defensive catcher with a decent stick, but probably not the hitter his ridiculous minor-league numbers coaxed some into thinking he could be.

Yankees (April 22-24): There's no sense in wasting time detailing Jeter's credentials. But beyond him the 2014 Yankees could conceivably put as many as six hall of famers on the field -- or as few as zero.

From this view, Ichiro Suzuki deserves to be enshrined, regardless of whether he manages to collect the 258 more hits he needs to reach 3,000 in America. A case can be made that there's a hollowness to his numbers, but his MVP nominations suggest he was among the best players in the AL for a full decade, and he's got 10 gold gloves on top of leading the majors in hits seven times. It says here that C.C. Sabathia should get in, too. He was a top-five Cy Young candidate for five straight years, his ERA is 21 percent better than the league average over the course of his career, and his most comparable pitcher through age 32 is -- get this -- Greg Maddux. Tom Seaver is third. Sabathia won't be as clear-cut a choice as Maddux or Seaver was, but if he extends a streak of seven straight 200-inning campaigns by at least another couple of years, and approaches 250 wins (he's now at 205) the decision shouldn't be difficult.

Beyond that, things get murkier among the men in pinstripes. Might the perpetually well-rounded Carlos Beltran, with a favorably comparative 67.5 career WAR, push himself over the top by succeeding as a Yankee? Could Mark Teixeira, with his 130 OPS-plus, put himself in the discussion by putting together two or three more healthy seasons? Does Alfonso Soriano merit any consideration if he gets to 450 homers and 300 steals? And could Brian McCann benefit from Yankee Stadium's short porch enough to average 21 homers a year throughout his contract? Do that and he'd likely have 300 homers with anywhere from 10-12 All-Star appearances as a catcher.

Rays (April 29-May 1): Evan Longoria turned 28 in October, and has played only six big-league seasons, one of which was cut in half by injury -- yet the third baseman has already totaled 36.3 WAR during his career. According to Jay Jaffe and his JAWS system, the average HOF third baseman has totaled 42.7 over the seven best seasons of his career, so if Longoria's 2014 merely meets the average standard he's set for himself over his first six years, he'll meet that standard in the minimum amount of time. From there his candidacy is just a matter of longevity for a player whose prime is only just beginning. And considering he's still got 10 seasons left on his deal with the Rays, that shouldn't be a problem unless injuries interfere.

David Price seems like the type of elite talent that could be compiling hall-of-fame credentials, but the left-handed starter is sneakily old. He'll be 29 before the end of this season, which he enters with only 71 wins; by comparison, Sabathia had almost 50 more wins and a similar ERA-plus at the same age, so Price's best hope would be to win a couple more Cy Young awards, and let that speak to his dominance. Fellow southpaw Matt Moore is five years Price's junior, but he'd need to seriously curb a rate of 4.5 walks per nine innings to take his career to the next tier, and reigning rookie of the year Wil Myers has the makings of a star, but it's too early to make a judgment.


MAY

Rays return
Athletics (May 2-4): Although they're the two-time defending AL West champs, and are the pick of many to win that division again this year, the A's don't have anyone who figures to ever be considered for the hall of fame. Sonny Gray is a talented young pitcher, Yoenis Cespedes is a dynamic outfielder, Josh Donaldson deserved more MVP consideration than he received last season, and the rest are a bunch of scrappy, solid major leaguers. But there's really not a high-level star in the bunch.

Reds (May 6-7): Interleague play doesn't bring Cincinnati to Boston very often, so a quick two-game set gives Sox fans a relatively rare chance to see some quality players. Brandon Phillips, Jay Bruce, Mat Latos, Johnny Cueto, and Aroldis Chapman are all worth paying to see, though the biggest draw is undoubtedly Joey Votto -- who is one of the best hitters in baseball today, and could parlay that status into an induction ceremony someday.

The 2010 NL MVP has reached base in 43.1 percent of his plate appearances since the start of the 2009 season, has posted an OPS 55 percent higher than the league average throughout his career, and his .314 lifetime batting average ranks sixth-best among active players. He turned 30 in September, though he's signed through 2023. If he's as good for half of the remaining deal as he's been to this point, he'll merit consideration for the hall.

Tigers (May 16-18): Detroit returns to the site of its ALCS failure with a few new faces, but again with a loaded roster. Hall of fame consideration isn't in the future for Victor Martinez, Torii Hunter, and Joe Nathan, though all have had very good careers. Miguel Cabrera, meanwhile, is a no-doubt, first-ballot hitter after back-to-back MVP awards made it 11 times in his 11 seasons that he's earned votes for that honor. His top comparable according to Baseball-Reference is Hank Aaron, for goodness sake. He'd get in if he retired this weekend.

Justin Verlander, on the other hand, still has some work to do. Concerns that he had lost something were allayed some by his stellar performances in the postseason, however his most similar player after each of the past three seasons has been Mike Mussina -- so Verlander still has more to prove to voters. Mussina was thought to be a borderline hall candidate before receiving 20.3 percent of the vote this time around, so the Cooperstown fate of the Tigers' ace is likely to be decided by what the soon-to-be-31-year-old does henceforth.

Blue Jays (May 20-22): A year after trying to load up with big names, the Jays enter 2014 without a lot of top-flight talent, and with no legitimate hall of fame hopefuls. Jose Reyes is the closest to that category, but through 11 seasons he's totaled just 33.2 WAR, and has only once finished among the top 10 in MVP voting. Good player, but it'd be a stretch to even call him great.

Braves (May 28-29): The Braves have averaged 93 wins over the past four seasons, and they're not going anywhere soon based on their wealth of young talent. Jason Heyward, Andrelton Simmons, Justin Upton, Freddie Freeman, and Julio Teheran will all be 26 or younger when the season begins, and any -- or all -- could be stars for years to come.

Craig Kimbrel, meanwhile, will be just 25. And as he enters his fourth year as the Braves' closer, he's starting to develop a hall-worthy resume. At age 24 his closest comparison was hall of famer Bruce Sutter, and all he's done since then is lead the major leagues with 50 saves while posting a 1.21 ERA. It's rather tough for a reliever to earn that type of all-time recognition, but after three straight seasons in which he's been a legitimate Cy Young candidate, while also receiving MVP votes, Kimbrel has himself positioned to assume Mariano Rivera's best-closer-in-the-game mantel -- and done so at an age by which Rivera himself had just one professional save, that coming in the rookie league.


JUNE

Indians (June 12-15): Numerically, 438 homers and a .400 on-base percentage suggest Jason Giambi could be a candidate for Cooperstown. Statistical comparisons to Willies Stargell and McCovey confirm that, too, so if voters ever begin to more seriously consider admitted users of performance-enhancing drugs, Giambi deserves a look. He was arguably the best hitter in the American League for a five-year span.

Giambi might not make the Tribe (he's 43, he hit .183 last year, and he's on a minor-league deal), but even if he is among their traveling party in June, the Indians' most viable hall candidate is almost unquestionably their manager -- whose credentials are rather familiar to the fans of Boston. Last season Terry Francona added a manager of the year award to his resume, which already included the two World Series he won with the Red Sox, and those titles make him one of 23 managers ever to win more than one ring; 18 of them have won at least 1,000 games and have a winning career record; 15 of those 18 have been enshrined in Cooperstown; the others are Danny Murtaugh, Ralph Houk, and Francona.

Twins (June 16-18): After 10 years spent primarily as a catcher, that Joe Mauer has the highest batting average among all active major leaguers (.323) is a testament to the idea that he will go down as one of the best hitters of his generation. He averages only 14 homers and 87 RBIs per 162 games, and only once has he ranked among the AL's top 10 in total bases, but even without that power his production puts him near the top of the list in terms of OPS-plus, which sits at 136 lifetime. Throw in an MVP award and three gold gloves at a defense-first position, and his candidacy should be strong when the time comes -- particularly if the Twins can successfully prolong his prime by using him at first base more regularly.

Cubs (June 30-July 2): Chicago is so young in Theo Epstein's third year that it's impossible to project what will ultimately become of most players on its roster, but there are some intriguing pieces. Most established among them is Starlin Castro, who needs to become a much better player to earn the $64 million he could earn between now and 2020, but is just 24 years old. Former Sox farmhand Anthony Rizzo is the same age as he comes off a season in which he had 23 homers and 80 RBIs, and showed a plate discipline that suggests he's establishing himself at this level.

And there's a slight chance that by this point in the year, top prospect Javier Baez, a Double-A shortstop who hit 37 bombs in the minors last season, could be up with a big club that's clearly playing for the future. Other prospects could be, too.

JULY
Orioles, Blue Jays return White Sox (July 7-10): The White Sox have two of the 42 players ever to hit at least 434 home runs, and neither has ever been linked to performance enhancers, but neither is likely a hall of famer. The holes in Adam Dunn's game (and his swing) counteract the fact that with 440 taters at age 34, there's a pretty good chance he finishes with more than 500. He's never finished among the top 20 in MVP voting. Paul Konerko, meanwhile, has finished in the top six twice, and is a more complete offensive player than Dunn, but his numbers are likely to fall just shy. His closest historical comparison to this point is Fred McGriff, who has been between 12 percent and 24 percent in each of his five years on the hall ballot. Seems about right for Konerko, too.

Beyond that, there's lefty Chris Sale, who has finished fifth and sixth in Cy Young voting after his two seasons as a starter -- but, then, they're just two seasons. He needs to do it for longer, though a slight build and an unorthodox delivery beg questions about whether he can.

Royals (July 18-20): Kansas City is another team with a few excellent players, most notably Alex Gordon, Billy Butler, Eric Hosmer, and Salvador Perez. The last two on that list both established their star credentials in 2013, when both were just 23.

Hosmer answered a disappointing 2012 campaign by hitting .302 with 17 homers and winning a gold glove at first base, while Perez had his mitt minted behind the plate and batted .292. Through 989 career plate appearances the backstop has hit .301, and when that type of offensive ability is paired with a throwing arm that eliminated 42 percent of would-be base stealers in 2012, the potential is there for Perez to have an outstanding career as one of KC's cornerstones.


AUGUST

Yankees return
Astros (Aug. 14-17): Catcher Jason Castro posted an OPS-plus of 130 last season. The career of Jose Altuve, now 24, was by 22 most similar to that of Rod Carew. Brett Oberholtzer and Jarred Cosart are a couple of good-looking young arms. But, really, there are no Astros who are anywhere near must-see attractions.

Angels (Aug. 18-21): Despite what he's devolved into over the last year and a half, and what he could well become between now and the expiration of his contract in 2021, Albert Pujols is the most sure-fire hall of famer scheduled to play in Fenway this year. Jeter included. And though he won't be 23 until August, in a few years there may not be much more doubt about Mike Trout. Six of his top seven most similar batters through age 21 are already in the hall, and their names include Mickey Mantle, Ted Williams, and Hank Aaron. That's a hell of a start.

Beyond that, the Angels have a bunch of players who'll probably retire proudly claiming good, solid careers -- but none getting invited to Cooperstown. That list includes Josh Hamilton, the MVP and batting champ who might've had a chance if drugs didn't cost him his early years, but appears to be trending downward as he approaches his 33rd birthday in May.

Mariners (Aug. 22-24): Seatle spent megabucks on Robinson Cano in the offseason, and for that money that got a player who is probably a few consistent seasons away from ensuring his hall credentials. He's right on the cusp at this point, according to Jaffe's JAWS system, with his seven best seasons totaling up to 44.1 WAR, and the average hall-of-fame second baseman boasting a total of 44.5. For his career, Cano is at 45.2 WAR, which is 24.3 shy of the average HOFer -- but that's roughly what Cano has accumulated over the past three and a half seasons, so it's certainly attainable over the length of a 10-year deal.

New teammate Felix Hernandez will need to stay healthy, but induction is a distinct possibility for him, too -- as even though Larry Dierker is his most similar comparison through age 27, the next two on the list are Greg Maddux and Dennis Eckersley. The question with him could be how long he can sustain his level of success, as although he's not yet 28 he has thrown over 1,800 innings. That's more than any active pitcher under the age of 32, and 727.2 more than the next active 27-year-old on the list (Yovani Gallardo). If Hernandez can remain a reasonable approximation of himself until he hits free agency at age 34, he'll likely hit the market as a hall-of-famer-to be. If the mileage starts to catch up with him, however, he could go down as another start remembered as one of the best in his generation, but ultimately without a plaque to prove it.

SEPTEMBER
Blue Jays, Orioles, Rays, Yankees return

Sox in position to make a deal

Posted by David D'Onofrio December 10, 2013 07:00 AM

As baseball's Winter Meetings wind down in Orlando -- and Disney World again becomes a place where kids' dreams come true, rather than the place where the dreams of baseball fans tend to die as mere rumors -- the general consensus is that the Red Sox are in a pretty good position. They have resources remaining. Their ring-resulting success has made Boston a desirable destination again. And it has afforded them a chance to operate patiently by alleviating some of the pressure to make a splash.

At the same time, there's also agreement that the Sox still have some holes to fill. The left side of the infield needs to be fortified, be it with another regular or a role player. They could use an outfielder

What's next for the Sox in center field?

Posted by David D'Onofrio December 4, 2013 08:30 AM

Back during his days at Oregon State, even before Boston selected him with the 23rd pick of the 2005 amateur draft, Jacoby Ellsbury was playing his part as the next coming of Johnny Damon -- this time at Halloween, when he was stuck without a get-up until a friend opened his closet and pulled out a Red Sox jersey.

"It was an easy costume," the outfielder recalled. "I just needed to go out and get a beard."

A few years later, after Coco Crisp couldn't quite replicate Damon's dynamics at the top of the order, the Red Sox asked Ellsbury to play that role in real life. And for the better part of six-plus seasons, he succeeded. He was an all-star, he earned MVP votes a couple times, and, most importantly, he was a key piece of a championship. Twice, in Ellsbury's case.

Now Ellsbury will follow Damon's footsteps again, this time to New York, where the Yankees have reportedly lured him with the life-changing promise of $153 million, plus job security until he's 37 years old -- and so now it's he who the Red Sox are forced to try and replace, both in center field and at the top of the lineup.

The second part of that equation is somewhat easily resolved. Shane Victorino has 216 games of experience as a big-league leadoff hitter, and Dustin Pedroia has batted there 87 times -- 11 of which came when Ellsbury broke a bone in his foot this past September. Both might better serve the club elsewhere in the order, but both are likewise capable of leading the way if need be.

Who takes over in center field is potentially more complex. Let's take a look at some of the possibilities:

Jackie Bradley Jr. -- Barely eight months ago, after he tore up the Grapefruit League, the debate going on in these parts was about whether it was wise for the Sox to have Bradley start the season in the bigs because it could potentially allow him to reach free agency a year earlier than he would otherwise.

That proved to not be a concern, as Bradley wound up playing 80 games at Triple-A, and so he'll remain under team control for six more seasons. But let's not lose sight of the type of talent this guy was considered to be then, and should still be considered now. He struggled in his 107 major-league plate appearances over three separate stints -- batting .197 -- though in his first season at Triple-A he posted a .374 on-base percentage, which led to an .842 OPS.

That's 102 points higher than Ellsbury posted at the same level around the same age, and though Bradley isn't nearly as polished a hitter as Ellsbury is at this point, he has the plate discipline to contribute while correcting the holes that were exposed last April, and his defense in center field might well represent an immediate upgrade for the Sox.

It's probably asking too much to think he'll be ready for an everyday role from the start, but part of the reason the Sox were comfortable with Ellsbury leaving is that Bradley was waiting in the wings. Look for them to ease him into the lineup early, and depending how that goes, the job could potentially be his by the end of 2014.

Victorino -- He won a Gold Glove in right field this past season, but he has played center for most of his career, and certainly appears capable of doing it again if asked to do so.

If Bradley sits every three or four days at the start of the year, it'll be as simple as Victorino sliding over while Daniel Nava (or somebody else) plays in right. Although there also remains the possibility that the Sox could yet add a veteran to play in one of the corners, and push Victorino to the middle on a more permanent basis.

That would delay Bradley's emergence significantly, but the possibilities are intriguing. Most appealing would be Shin-Soo Choo, though he would certainly be the most expensive. Nelson Cruz would be interesting as a right-handed power bat, though he'd be an adventure defensively and is currently asking for more than the Sox would be willing to pay. And if Wednesday's reports are true that Carlos Beltran has a three-year, $48 million offer in hand, he's probably too rich for the Red Sox' blood, too.

If the Sox really don't want to overextend themselves on years or dollars, they could alternatively look to add a lower-priced, role-playing veteran -- think along the lines of Rajai Davis, Nate McLouth, or Kelly Johnson -- and add them to the mix with Victorino, Bradley, Nava, Jonny Gomes and Mike Carp.

Choo -- If the Sox were to shell out a big-dollar deal, Choo might be the leading candidate among those left on the market. He does everything well, as evidenced last season by his .423 OBP, his 21 homers, his 20 steals, his 34 doubles, his 4.22 pitches per plate appearance, and his 4.2 WAR (per Baseball-Reference). He's not a great center fielder, but he played 150 games there for a playoff team last season, so he would at least be capable in right.

There are two factors working against this possibility, however. First is that he'll be 32 at midseason, and at that age it may be unlikely that the Sox would be willing to go beyond three or four years. Second is that Choo is a Scott Boras client who is said to be seeking nine figures, and is now the most desirable outfielder available. He may get what he's looking for in terms of money and security -- and if he does it isn't likely to be in Boston.

Matt Kemp -- The Dodgers outfielder -- who is immensely talented, but is owed $128 million over the next six years -- would contradict the disciplined approach Ben Cherington has so ably applied over the past 16 months. Each of his last two seasons have been ruined by injury, and after that there's too much risk that trading for him will ultimately leave the Red Sox paying dead money at the end of the deal.

Andre Ethier -- Kemp's LA teammate is best friends with Dustin Pedroia and a decent player. But he, too, is prohibitively overpaid. If all things were equal, he'd be a nice addition, however he's due to be paid $69 million over the next four seasons. The production doesn't match the price -- unless the Dodgers' overcrowded outfield (currently with Kemp, Ethier, Yasiel Puig, and Carl Crawford) motivates them to eat a big chunk of the money he's owed.

Denard Span -- CBS Sports reported last month that the Nationals would listen to offers for the 29-year-old outfielder, and it may be worth the Sox at least inquiring. A .283 hitter with a .351 OBP, he's accustomed to batting leadoff and is due to make just $6.5 million next season, with a $9 million team option for 2015. Boston would have to give something up to get him, but they'd be getting a quality player at a good rate.

Curtis Granderson -- Ellsbury's deal squeezes him out of the Bronx, and while Granderson is currently evaluating his options on the open market, an injury-plagued 2013 campaign isn't likely to do much for his value. The Mets are said to be trying to get his signature on a three-year contract, though if the affable slugger sought to stay in the AL and try to rebuild his worth by taking a high-dollar, one-year deal the Sox could be enticing. Granderson could handle center field at Fenway, and would be a great fit for this team, but that scenario is probably a long shot given what is apparently available elsewhere.

Gerardo Parra -- The 26-year-old Diamondback has won Gold Gloves two of the past three years, playing primarily on the corners of the outfield in those seasons, and with two years of arbitration eligibility remaining, there is talk that Arizona is exploring an extension after he hit 43 doubles in 2013. He's a below-average offensive player for his career, but the Sox reportedly inquired about his availability in the middle of the 2012 season, and he could be on their radar again if the Diamondbacks can't hash out a multi-year deal.

A mystery player -- The Red Sox are a team with resources, monetarily, in the minors, and in terms of major league-ready starting pitching. If there's a player out there who the Sox want, they have the capability of putting together a package to get him. Obviously some will be unattainable no matter what the offer -- they're not prying Mike Trout from the Angels -- but the possibilities multiply as the front office gets more aggressive.

The question now, with Ellsbury gone, is how far they're willing to go.

As Sox let him walk, what can be expected from Salty moving forward?

Posted by David D'Onofrio December 3, 2013 10:27 PM

Standing near the stall he inherited from Jason Varitek a couple of years earlier, in a chaotic clubhouse that reeked of victory's sweet stench, Jarrod Saltalamacchia was asked if he'd considered the possibility that that night -- the night the Red Sox beat the Cardinals and became world champions again -- could be his last in a Boston uniform.

"This season I've been enjoying every pitch, every out knowing it could be my last -- but tonight especially," he said. "I was just looking at the stands, and seeing everybody, just looking at the jersey and enjoying every minute of it. Hopefully I can be back."

Part of his desire to be back, he explained, was based on the home he'd found at Fenway Park after a tough stint in Texas. Billed as a big-time prospect even before he broke into the big leagues on his 22nd birthday, he was a major piece of the package the Braves sent the Rangers for Mark Teixeira, though when he struggled to establish himself with his new organization he was back in the minors full-time by age 25 -- and that's when the Red Sox made a trade that would afford him another opportunity.

"It saved my career," Saltalamacchia said of the 2010 deadline-day swap. "I was kind of stuck in a spot where I didn't feel I was wanted or needed or going to be able to go anywhere. Then I came over here and it was just night and day. I felt wanted, I felt they knew what I was capable of doing. They actually gave me a chance. I can't thank these guys enough."

Tuesday, though, it became apparent that the Red Sox no longer wanted Saltalamacchia -- at least not for the next three years, and not at the price he figured to command after the best season of his career. There are a couple of quality catching prospects in the pipeline, and rather than commit to the 28-year-old, they opted to entrust the position to a pair of 37-year-old veterans for 2014, and reevaluate their options again next winter.

Whether Saltalamacchia even wanted to stay has been called into question, and rightfully so. He lost his starting job after his throwing error ended Game 3 of the World Series, and put the Sox in a 2-1 hole. David Ross started the next three games, and Boston won them all.

That made Saltalamacchia look expendable, and it's only natural if he was disappointed that after catching 242 games over the past two seasons, he was on the bench when the club climbed to the summit of its sport -- but from this seat, the timing says everything: Tuesday morning it's revealed that A.J. Pierzynski will sign with the Red Sox; Tuesday evening comes word that Saltalamacchia is inking a deal with the Marlins. Based on that, it sure would seem as though the player waited until the door was definitively shut in Boston before dedicating his future to Miami.

More important than Saltalamacchia's own desires, though, are the questions about whether this was the right decision for the Red Sox. Most immediate is the one that asks, Is it wise to count on two catchers who were in high school before Xander Bogaerts was born, one of whom has caught more than 14,000 major-league innings, and another who missed months this past year because of two concussions?

But in the bigger picture, it's worth asking whether the Sox will regret letting go of a hitter who this past season became one of 15 catchers since 1901 to slug 40 doubles, and who was among the top three offensive catchers in the American League this year, and whether they might have misjudged the market for Saltalamacchia's services.

As it turned out, reports indicate that the agreement with his hometown Marlins will pay him $21 million over three seasons -- equating to an annual value of $7 million. After the money paid to the likes of Brian McCann and Carlos Ruiz, most (maybe including the Sox) were anticipating the price would be higher than that for Saltalamacchia, who was easily worth that much this past season, when Baseball-Reference calculated his WAR to be 2.9. He was probably worth that in 2012, too, when his WAR was 1.4.

We don't know now what Saltalamacchia will be worth in 2014 -- or, perhaps more importantly, in 2016. But one way to project is to look at what players whose offensive careers most closely compare to his through age 28 have done after reaching that age.

Again according to Baseball-Reference, that list of comparables is led by Jody Davis, the ex-Cub and Brave who earned MVP votes and a Gold Glove award in 1986, at age 29. More contemporarily, the comparisons also include John Buck (at No. 2), Ramon Hernandez, and Michael Barrett.

Of the 10 players most comparable to Saltalamacchia, all played at least three more years in the majors, and played five more years on average. Only a couple have played the remainder of their careers with an OPS+ lower than 90, so for the most part they've all been right around the league average -- as has Saltalamacchia, owner of an OPS+ of 95. And that's only one of the categories in which the expectations Saltalamacchia has set for himself based on his performance to this point are close to what history's 10 most comparable hitters have done henceforth.

Here's how the numbers compare, based on average per 162 games:

PAABH2B3BHRRBIBBSOBAOBPSLGOPS
Average/162592528135252177151900.2570.3280.3630.691
Salty average/1626005451343312175501760.2460.3100.4280.738

The two biggest differences come in terms of strikeouts and slugging percentage, but over the past couple seasons the second has helped to justify the first in Saltalamacchia's case. And while these comparisons don't account for defense (beyond purely position) in their calculations, WAR totals do, and Ed Hermann -- a backup by the mid-1970s -- was the only negative player after age 28 on Saltalamacchia's list of comparables. Meanwhile, the average player in that group posted a WAR of 4.6 after turning 29.

So, then, there's a basis to believe Saltalamacchia will be an average or slightly above average player for the next few years. And a player of that caliber, at an important position, who is familiar with both the city and the pitching staff, and who is young but experienced, would seem to be worth the price of $7 million per season. Particularly for a team with the resources of the Red Sox.

Obviously Boston's brass doesn't agree, or at least it doesn't think he'll represent as good a value as the alternatives by the time he's turning 31, and guys like Christian Vazquez and Blake Swihart are ready for The Show. Though Pierzynski is a temporary stopgap, they're clearly looking longer-term in this decision.

And have left Saltalamacchia -- whether he likes it or not -- looking at Fenway, its fans, its home jerseys, from the outside.

As Sox assess options, Napoli should come first -- one way or another

Posted by David D'Onofrio November 11, 2013 12:54 AM

A year ago it took the Red Sox nearly two months before they were officially able to get Mike Napoli's signature on a new contract. He visited Boston in November. He agreed to a three-year deal in early December. Then it was well into mid-January before he and the team reached agreement on a restructured one-year deal that was reduced from its original form because the club was uncomfortable a hip condition.

A year later, it's safe to say Napoli was worth the wait -- and the $13 million the Sox paid him. He slugged 23 homers and knocked in 92 runs over 139 games, then added a few more big hits during the playoff run that resulted in the franchise's third World Series championship since 2004. The hip was never an issue, and he proved to be a quality first baseman in addition to being a middle-of-the-order bat.

So this time the Sox should make every effort to get him to sign as soon as possible. And not only because they want the player back, but because whether or not Napoli is in the mix figures to have a significant impact on the direction the team takes this winter.

It won't be quite as easy as it could've been, now that Napoli has officially declined the Sox' $14.1 million qualifying offer, and instead opted to let free agency set his market value. Should Napoli get his socks -- or, in this case, Sox -- knocked off by somebody, and decide to follow that payday elsewhere, the Sox would obviously have a vacancy at first base, and would likely be looking to find a right-handed bat to platoon with Mike Carp.

But the fallout from a decision on Napoli's future would affect more than merely his own position. For instance, if Napoli were to leave, the Sox would lose their biggest source of right-handed power -- which has become something of a commodity within the game, and which has particular use in this lineup because it can be wielded to protect David Ortiz in the batting order. The designated hitter was intentionally walked a major-league leading 27 times this season; if it's Carp, or Jonny Gomes, or Daniel Nava hitting behind him every day, that number stands to rise.

The Sox could theoretically take a chance on 37-year-old Paul Konerko, or perhaps 32-year-old Corey Hart (who didn't play this past season due to a knee injury), but there's really not a lot of appeal among the free-agent first basemen available, so they might be more likely to instead look to make a trade. And that's where things could get interesting.

Of the names that have been said to be available, maybe the most logical fit for the Sox is the Angels' Mark Trumbo. He's hit 95 homers over the past three seasons, he has played the outfield as well, and his contract is bound to arbitration for the next three years -- but given those credentials any team looking for power will be interested in adding him at age 27, and so, even as imperfect and unpolished a hitter as he is, the price is likely to be steep.

Los Angeles' primary motivation in making him available is to upgrade its pitching, and in that case, Boston could be a match. At this point the Sox have six established big-league starters, and guys like Allen Webster, Rubby De La Rosa, and Anthony Ranaudo aren't far away. Then there are others like Brandon Workman and Drake Britton, whose roles for next season and beyond are still somewhat unknown.

The Sox have the requisite resources to be comfortable with sending the Angels a package that includes Felix Doubront as well as a decent pitching prospect, and the Globe's Nick Cafardo has also suggested that with LA also looking for a third baseman, the Angels could be interested in Will Middlebrooks, too.

Even if Trumbo is moved to another team, though, Middlebrooks' status would figure to be unresolved until Napoli's future is determined -- because he represents the club's best internal hope of replacing Napoli's production. Even in a season where he twice lost his starting job, and played 45 games at Triple-A, he finished third on the team with 17 home runs. Through 169 big-league games, he's blasted 32 homers and has 133 RBIs. His on-base percentage is a much-to-be-desired .294, though on a per-162-game basis his power numbers are basically equivalent to Napoli's.

Keep in mind, too, that Middlebrooks is also seven years younger, and power numbers tend to get better as a batter matures in his late-20s. So there's a good chance that if Napoli leaves this winter, Middlebrooks will be capable of becoming that legitimate, middle-of-the-order, right-handed power bat over the next couple of years.

A below-average third baseman this year, he could also make the move over to first base, and the Sox could shift Xander Bogaerts to third and offer Stephen Drew a multi-year deal to remain at short until Garin Cecchini is ready to take over the hot corner on an everyday basis.

The Sox could also bring back Drew as a defensive stopgap if Napoli re-signs, and then trade Middlebrooks to help fill another need -- but they should do neither until they know whether or not Napoli is part of the plan.

Bringing back Drew and Napoli, while keeping Middlebrooks within the organization, would not be a good use of the roster and resources if Bogaerts is really going to get his opportunity to be a big-league regular. Conversely, trading Middlebrooks while letting Drew or Napoli exit would leave them needing to plug a hole at one of the two corner infield positions at a time when the alternatives aren't enticing and a trade would be expensive.

So the Sox are at risk of being stuck with no clear plan for at least one starting position, and a big spot in their batting order -- but that risk can be quickly negated if they simply act swiftly on Napoli. While accepting his Executive of the Year honors, Sox GM Ben Cherington said Monday that his team "absolutely" wants Napoli back. He praised the first baseman and his agent for their transparency in the early stages of this process. And Napoli indicated a few times near the end of the season that his desire is to stay in Boston.

Both sides want it to happen, and both sides are plenty familiar with each other -- so there's no sense in messing around. Leave room for negotiation, sure, but the Sox should be aggressive in their offer(s) to Napoli and try to gauge whether they're thinking the same way in terms of his market value. If they are, Sox brass should push to make a deal. If they're not, the club should let it be known that the team is prepared to move on. Then, if they must, they should do just that.

No hemming. No hawing. No long, drawn-out back and forth. Too many other decisions depend on how the Napoli negotiations play out to let them linger fpr a few weeks, or even a month -- let alone two.

Comparing the champs

Posted by David D'Onofrio November 1, 2013 07:00 AM
By the time Shane Victorino strode toward the batter's box with the bases loaded during the third inning in Game 6 of the World Series, his walk-up song, Bob Marley's "Three Little Birds," had become one of the unofficial anthems that served as the soundtrack to the Red Sox' postseason run. It had become a fun Fenway moment: As the right fielder would step in, the song would cut out, and the fans would finish the song.

"Every little thing," they yelled, "gonna be all right."

But by the time Victorino got to third base, after clearing the bases with a double and taking 90 more feet as Jonny Gomes slid safely into the plate, those words had come to be more than a fun moment or a new coming-together feature of the Fenway experience. They'd come to encapsulate the mentality of Red Sox fans in this era.

A decade ago -- and for most of the 86 years before that -- Fenway in that moment would've been filled with fans wondering what was going to go wrong. How they were going to blow it. What brutal error, or dreadful decision, or act of God was going to intervene.

But those days are gone. As Victorino came up in the third, then again when he knocked a run-scoring single in the fourth, the place erupted with a sense that a third title in 10 seasons was coming to Boston. The first two having erased so much of the fretting in these circumstances, there was confidence. There was anticipation.

There was a feeling that, indeed, every little thing gonna be all right.

"I had a lot of confidence," Victorino said, discussing the approach he took throughout his first season in Boston. "The pieces of the puzzle were here. The guys that were added to that puzzle, we were just trying to be complementary players. I didn't come with the mindset that I'm going to be this guy, that guy. All of us, we went with the mindset that we were going to be one team. We're going to go out there, we 're going to have fun.

"And this year we're the world champs."

They're a different breed of world champ than either of the two title winners that preceded them in this century, that's for sure. But what's less certain -- and will likely be a subject of debate over the hot stove this winter -- is how the three championship clubs compare to each other, and, ultimately, which is the best team of the bunch.

In some ways it's an unanswerable question, considering baseball has transitioned to another era since Boston boarded the duck boats in 2004, even though the time span in question is only nine years. Numbers must be viewed in a completely different context because of testing for performance-enhancing drugs, and different parity-driven rules have changed the way rosters are built.

The case could be made the unexpected nature of this latest title separates it from the others, and David Ortiz, the only player to be part of all three clubs, did just that after collecting MVP honors. "This is a team that we have a lot of players with heart," he said. "We probably don't have the talent that we have in '07 and '04, but we have guys that are capable to stay focused and do the little things. And when you win with a ballclub like that, that's special."

But is it the most special? Is 2013 the best team? Was that 2004 team really the most talented? We'll let you draw your own conclusions, but here's a look at some of the various factors you may want to consider as you do. Click on each category to open up a comparison between the three teams, and keep in mind that stats are for the regular season (unless noted).

HITTING
OPS0.8340.8060.795
OPS+110107117
OBP0.3600.3620.349
R949867853
2B373352363
HR222166178
Analysis: We remember the 2004 champs as an offensive juggernaut, and justifiably so. The lineup was stacked from top to bottom, and with Ortiz and Manny Ramirez the Nos. 3-4 hitters, the middle was pretty darn good, too. But while the 2013 lineup may not have been as loaded, it was arguably better in relation to what the rest of the league had to offer. You can see above that this year's team had a higher OPS+, and while it scored 96 fewer runs, the 2013 team scored 0.94 runs per game more than the average AL team, which equates to 22 percent; the 2004 team scored 0.85 runs per game more than the average AL team, which equates to 17 percent. When factoring era into the equation, it's hardly absurd to say the 2013 team had the best offense of the three.
PITCHING
>
ERA4.183.873.79
ERA+116123108
Starters' ERA4.314.213.84
Relievers' ERA3.923.103.70
Quality start %535259
Save %737958
CloserFoulkePapelbonUehara
Strikeouts113211491294
K:BB2.532.382.47
WHIP1.291.271.30
Opponents' OPS0.7270.7050.710
FIP4.034.143.84
Analysis: The common theme here is that all three clubs received a career year from their closer, and all three of those relievers piled up high strikeout-to-walk ratios. The 2007 team had the best bullpen, led by Jonathan Papelbon and Hideki Okajima, but the best overall staff probably goes to 2004. That group had three starters post an ERA+ of at least 120 (Curt Schilling, Pedro Martinez, and Bronson Arroyo), had five hurlers make at least 29 starts, and had a good, reliable cast of veteran relievers.
DEFENSE
Fielding %0.9810.9860.987
Errors1188180
UZR/150-8.82.42.6
Gold gloves012
Analysis: The 2007 and 2013 were similar defensively, both decent -- and both far ahead of the 2004 team, whose stats live up to the memory that it was something of a slow-pitch softball team. It made 38 more errors during the regular season, then made eight more over the first two games of the World Series. Suffice it to say, run prevention wasn't the priority back then. (Admittedly, these numbers don't take into account the runs this year's Red Sox saved themselves by shifting far more often than either of those two earlier iterations did.)
BASERUNNING
SB6896123
SB%0.6940.8000.866
Extra base %343439
Analysis: Led by a remarkable 52-for-56 from Jacoby Ellsbury, much was made of the Sox' success rate when attempting to steal bases this season, but the 2007 team was a bit underrated in that regard, successfully swiping four of every five prospective bags. What the 2013 club did better than the others was take the extra base, as 39 percent of the time they moved up two bases on a single or three bases on a double. They were aggressive -- somewhat overly at times early in the year -- but they put pressure on defenses, and more often than not, it paid off.
PLAYER VALUE
Offensive bWAR30.329.339.4
Pitchers' bWAR24.430.916.2
Team bWAR54.760.255.6
MV PlayerDamonOrtizPedroia
MV PitcherSchillingBeckettBuchholz
All-Stars363
Previous All-Stars10913
MVP types*963
Cy Young types*422
Analysis: First things first: The WAR numbers are based on the Baseball-Reference calculation; "All-Stars" reflect the number of players named to the AL All-Star team that season; "Previous All-Stars" reflect the number of players who'd been named to an All-Star team before that season; and both "MVP types" and "Cy Young types" refer to the number of players on the team that received votes for those awards over the prior three seasons (so, for this year, in 2010, '11, or '12).

Now, you'll see that the WAR numbers suggest the 2007 team was the most balanced between offense and defense as far as value, and the proven experience of the 2013 team is illustrated in an impressive 13 players who'd previously been All-Stars, but it may have been the 2004 team that had the most players in (or at least at the end of) their prime. That club had nine players who'd received MVP votes between 2001-03, and four pitchers who'd merited Cy Young consideration over that span. That's a lot of star power.
STANDINGS
Overall record109-67107-69108-70
Days in 1st45172164
Largest lead2.511.59.5
Largest deficit10.513
Worst month11-14 (June)13-14 (June)15-15 (May)
Best month21-7 (August)20-8 (May)18-8 (April)
Analysis: The progression of the season was most similar between the 2007 and 2013 teams -- though that the 98-win Red Sox at one point trailed by 10.5 games in the division speaks to how good the Yankees were, and how hot Boston got late. Give the 2013 team credit, too, for being the only of the three clubs not to suffer at least one losing month.
CONSISTENCY
3-loss streaks 465
4-loss streaks330
5+-loss streaks100
3-win streaks141614
4-win streaks879
5+-win streaks1237
Analysis: The most impressive indication of the one-day-at-a-time approach of this year's Red Sox is that they never let their struggles roll into each other, and thus never lost more than three games in a row. The 2007 team was nearly as consistent, losing four straight three times, and never letting it get to five, while the 2004 champs had a knack for carrying momentum forward. They won 10 in a row at one point, and won at least five straight on five different occasions.
PLAYOFF OPPONENTS
Combined record298-188280-207282-205
Offensive rank181917
Pitching rank343023
Games needed141416
1-run games1 (1-0)2 (2-0)6 (3-3)
2-run games5 (4-1)1 (0-1)3 (2-1)
Analysis: The 2004 team beat the 101-win Yankees in the ALCS, then the 105-win Cardinals in the World Series. That's darn impressive. So is the fact that although both were pushed to seven games in the league championship series, both of Boston's two earlier title winners swept two series. However, when adding together where their three opponents ranked among major-league teams in runs scored/allowed during the regular season, the 2013 team faced the best collection of offenses and pitching staffs. The Tigers and Cardinals were the second- and third-best offenses in baseball this season, while the Rays were 12th. St. Louis was No. 5 in runs allowed, Detroit was No. 7, and Tampa Bay was No. 11. The 2013 team was certainly tested.
PLAYOFF PRODUCTION
Runs/game6.47.14.5
Batting average0.2840.3130.227
Home runs181810
ERA4.473.292.59
Strikeouts111119118
K:BB2.003.612.81
WHIP1.371.131.17
Analysis: To illustrate the difference nine years later, know that the '04 team's 4.47 postseason ERA was just 0.05 away from being the best in those playoffs -- while three teams finished this postseason with an ERA of 2.90 or better, including the top-ranked Sox. Of the three champions, the team that had the best postseason was the 2007 club, which finished with the highest batting average, the second-best ERA, was successful in all nine of its steal attempts, and led all playoff teams in defensive efficiency. Of the three runs, that middle one may ultimately become the afterthought. But, despite the valiant efforts of the Indians, was the most dominant.

5 keys to World Series Game 6

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 30, 2013 11:30 AM

If last Halloween someone had come to your door and told you that the Red Sox would at this point be one victory away from winning the World Series, and that Red Sox Nation would feel good about the chances of John Lackey securing that clincher, you'd have sooner believed the trick-or-treater in the red cape really was Superman.

But here we are. Boston is one win away from becoming the second team in baseball history to go from worst to first in a single season, and completing a redemption story like few others in the history of sports -- so let's look at five key factors that could determine if the fairy tale does indeed become reality in Wednesday night's Game 6...

1. Remain patient against Michael Wacha, and make him challenge.
The Cardinals' remarkable rookie had issued a total of just four walks over his three starts in the National League portion of these playoffs -- and one of those was intentional -- but the Red Sox worked him for four free passes the first time they faced him.

It wasn't that Wacha was wild, or that he was afraid of challenging Sox hitters. He threw 42.1 percent of his pitches within the strike zone -- which is a higher rate than his season average, and higher than in any start since an Aug. 10 outing against the Cubs.

It was more that the Sox did a better job of laying off his changeup than either the Pirates or Dodgers did, and stuck to their patient approach. Among his 114 pitches, Wacha threw a career-high 39 changeups, but Boston offered at only 18 of them, or 46.2 percent. In two NLCS starts, Los Angeles swung 64.2 percent of the time he changed speeds. And in his NLDS start, Pittsburgh hacked at 58.8 percent.

The Red Sox were the best fastball-hitting team in baseball this season, so even though Wacha amped it up to as high as 97 mph in Game 2, and lived around 94 that night, he and catcher Yadier Molina are likely to stick with the strategy based around using his heater to get ahead, then trying to finish hitters and get outs with the change (and the occasional curveball, as well). At Fenway last week, Wacha threw his changeup on 19 of the 30 pitches he threw with two strikes, but only 20 of the 84 pitches he threw with one or no strikes.

So the Sox' task is to get Wacha in situations where he's throwing a predictable fastball, and can't force the Sox into missed swings or weak contact by chasing his offspeed stuff outside the zone. And they must be ready to take advantage when he leaves that fastball over the plate. They were willing to wait him out in Game 2 -- only two of the first 17 Sox hitters swung at the first pitch they saw, and only four of 24 hacked right away -- so he only managed just one of the 1-2-3 innings that have become a hallmark of his dominance this October. He was done after six innings.

And as good as the Cardinals' bullpen is, the Sox will take their chances if they're able to oust Wacha so early again.

2. Hope Lackey does what Lackey does.
In terms of the circumstances and the matchup, it's hard to envision a scenario set up better for Lackey.

The pressure shouldn't be overwhelming, not after making his first relief appearance in a decade during the eighth inning of a tight contest in Game 4, and not after already having pitched a World Series clincher back in 2002.

He's pitching amid the comforts of Fenway Park, where he was excellent in Game 2, and has been great all season en route to a 2.47 ERA, a .236 opponents' batting average, and a 1.03 WHIP -- all of which are dramatically better numbers than what he's delivered on the road.

And he's pitching to a lineup full of players against which he's had previous success. Nobody in the Cardinal lineup has more than one hit against Lackey in his lifetime, with Carlos Beltran at 1-for-12 and Matt Holliday at 1-for-10 in the middle of the order.

Holliday, of course, got that hit in Game 2 -- a triple to the triangle that bounded by Jacoby Ellsbury and led to St. Louis' first run. However, Lackey has otherwise controlled the Cards' most dangerous bat. And throughout the season he's done a good job in limiting damage (in part because 22 of the 26 homers he allowed were solo shots).

If that remains true, and he capitalizes on his experience in these big spots, and in this ballpark, he should give the Sox what they need.

3. Fill the role Craig Breslow has played after Lackey.
John Farrell has kept Lackey on a relatively short leash in his starts, despite their general effectiveness. In fact, Lackey hasn't yet hit the 100-pitch mark in this postseason.

But in all three of those starting performances it was Breslow who came in to replace Lackey on the mound -- and with Breslow's recent ineffectiveness, it will be interesting to see if the manager lets Lackey pitch his way out of potential trouble in the middle innings, or if he turns to another member of his relief corps to pick up the slack in a pressure spot.

Breslow has retired one of the seven hitters he's faced in this series, and dating back to the start of the Detroit series he's walked six and yielded four hits over 3.2 innings. Unless Farrell is blindly loyal he's got to go in a different direction, which could be Felix Doubront if the manager wants to go with a lefty, or it could be Junichi Tazawa or Brandon Workman if the matchup splits are less relevant.

Either way, Breslow has recorded some very important outs for the Sox this year and this postseason -- especially following up Lackey. And Farrell will need to figure out how he's going to get those outs in Game 6.

4. Xander Bogaerts.
If David Ortiz wasn't in the midst of what may be the greatest World Series performance of all-time, the Red Sox' most dangerous hitter might be their 21-year-old third baseman.

Bogaerts has five hits and a walk in his last 11 plate appearances, boosting his OPS to 1.032 during the postseason. He's reaching base 46.7 percent of the time he comes to bat, and with those numbers Sox brass should give serious thought to moving him up in the order for Game 6, maybe to second (if Shane Victorino slides down in his return), or maybe even to fifth, where he could help Mike Napoli protect Ortiz.

It wouldn't be a bad idea to leave him as a presence near the bottom of the order, either. But no matter where he hits, he's a guy the Sox want to see walking to the plate in a big spot. Despite a total of 80 big-league plate appearances, they trust him as much as almost anyone at this point.

And with the way he's going there's a chance that he just might end a season that began in Portland by playing a significant part in the game that sees Boston win the World Series.

5. Keep Thursday in mind.
At this point, the Sox would love to get this over with Wednesday. Win the series in six. Seize the momentum created by winning twice in St. Louis. Celebrate all night. Not have to worry about a winner-take-all Game 7.

But they must remain mindful of that possibility.

Everything done in the course of Game 6 should be done in an effort to win that game -- though no decision should be reckless enough that it could potentially compromise the club's chances of winning the series if it gets to Thursday.

The biggest advantage a team earns by going up 3-2 at this point is that it gets two chances to win one game, but a major part of that advantage is that it spares the series-leading club from some of the desperation that's being felt and considered on the other side.

The Cardinals and Mike Matheny need to do whatever it takes to see tomorrow, so they can burn through pitchers, and put their players in crazy positions, and take an all-hands-on-deck approach. But Farrell and his staff should resist the urge to do the same. They've earned the right to be calm, and to retain the urgent levelheadedness that's put them here.

The goal isn't necessarily to win tonight. It's to win the World Series. And the Red Sox should keep that in mind in every choice they make.

An improbable rally puts an improbable season on the cusp of a championship

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 29, 2013 06:17 AM

When the greatest ever to play his position -- on this planet or any other -- is batting .733 on baseball's biggest stage, and when a pitcher twice outduels another of the game's elite with the two best starts of an already stellar postseason career, it commands attention.

In fact, if the Red Sox can complete this beyond-words odyssey with one more magical victory, nobody will object if it's decided that David Ortiz and Jon Lester should share the honors as World Series MVP. No New England sports fan will soon forget what the slugger has done through this series, or what the southpaw did in Game 5, particularly if millions are watching as the duck boats roll through downtown Boston this weekend.

But it shouldn't be forgotten, either, that with the World Series tied at two games apiece, and Game 5 tied at one in the top of the seventh, both Ortiz's RBI double and Lester's 23 outs of one-run ball might've easily gone to waste if it hadn't been for the impressive -- and, frankly, improbable -- rally put together by a bottom of the Boston lineup that had to that point been mostly miserable over the course of this best-of-seven.

That it began with Xander Bogaerts isn't entirely surprising -- beyond the fact that he began the season as a 20-year-old shortstop at Double-A, and is now the 21-year-old third baseman for the American League champs. He's struck out a bunch against St. Louis, but his bouncer through the middle was at that point his fifth hit in his last 10 at-bats, and his second of the night against Cardinals' ace Adam Wainwright.

Rather, the unforeseen really began when the rookie got to first, and Stephen Drew stepped into the box lugging with him the frustrations of a 4-for-49 slump. Dating back to the fourth game of the ALCS he had just one hit in 25 at-bats, that coming when the Cardinals' failure to communicate allowed a hapless fly ball to fall in front of the mound. and it had been 36 plate appearances since he worked a walk.

St. Louis starter Adam Wainwright hadn't walked anyone, his command consistent with numbers that showed him having allowing fewer walks per nine innings than all but two qualifying pitchers in the major leagues this season. And so once Drew took a strike, then fouled off a cut fastball to leave the battle a ball and two strikes, it looked as though Wainwright had the shortstop right where he wanted him.

Drew was a below-average hitter against curveballs this season, while the statistics say Wainwright has the second-best curveball in all of baseball -- and, regardless of the pitch type, only a couple starting pitchers in all the bigs entice more batters to swing at balls outside the strike zone. Once he missed his chance to hit the cutter, and got behind in the count, Drew looked like a sitting duck given his struggles of late.

His chances didn't seem much better when he laid off Wainwright's wicked curve to pull even, or, really, when he laid off another hook to run the count full. Plate discipline had not been a particular strength while striking out in 16 of his previous 33 at-bats -- yet when Wainwright called upon Uncle Charlie again with the count at 3-and-2, Drew left the bat on his shoulder as the ball broke down and away, laying off the pitch that had got him punched out just five innings earlier, and taking first base.

That brought David Ross to the plate with men on first and second, and with a lot of responsibility if the Red Sox were to seize this opportunity against a pitcher who typically gets tougher to hit as the game gets later. Lester was on deck, and the bullpen was quiet.

After two nights of heavily taxing his relief corps, and with the cruising lefty still at a low pitch count, Farrell had decided to leave he'd remain on the mound. Even if it meant a guy who's never had a hit in the major leagues would have to bat. If Ross made an out, then, the runners would most likely both be stranded. And his battle with Wainwright didn't start well. Like Drew, Ross fell behind 1-and-2.

During the regular season, Ross hit .077 whenever the count reached that point, and .135 with two strikes in general. Wainwright allowed opponents a .176 average after the count got to 1-and-2, and .159 with two strikes. Again, advantage Cardinals.

Again, Wainwright went to his devastating curveball.

And again, the Red Sox were ready for it. Ross stayed back just long enough that he kept fair a line drive he yanked down the left field line, and as it took a big hop into the seats Bogaerts was granted home. Boston had a lead, plus two more runners in scoring position, at second and third.

"I always defer to my teammates," Ross said. "Xander Bogaerts is maybe one of the best young players I've seen, the professional at‑bats he's thrown on this stage, it boggles my mind. What I would be doing as a 21‑year‑old in the World Series, I can't even ‑‑ I would be in awe. And that guy is having great at‑bats. Adam Wainwright is one of the best pitchers in baseball, and what a great at‑bat he was having.

"And Dirt has been scuffling a little bit. Got a really good at‑bat from him to walk, and just I think a little back‑up curveball that I hit down the line. That felt really good."

That made Farrell's decision to let Lester hit for himself a little more palatable, and although Wainwright did his job by retiring his counterpart, Jacoby Ellsbury then further diminished the chance the Sox would come to regret the choice not to reach for the throat by pinch-hitting for the pitcher.

Only 18 of 78 hitters Wainwright faced after throwing his 100th pitch reached base this season, and to that point Ellsbury was 3-for-19 in the series, having struck out in three of his four previous at-bats against the Cards' ace. But he took an aggressive cut at an 0-1 fastball the pitcher left elevated, and served Wainwright's 107th pitch into center.

Drew scored without a problem, and though Ross was thrown out at the plate trying to come all the way around from second, the Sox had a 3-1 lead. Nine outs later that would be good enough for a 3-2 advantage in the series. And now the Sox head home needing to win one of two at Fenway Park to be crowned as World Series champions.

Thanks to Ortiz, Lester -- and a cast of heroes as unlikely as this whole run has been from the beginning.

5 keys for Game 5 of the World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 28, 2013 03:30 PM

With a wacky and wild series down to a best-of-three, a look at some of what could factor in as the Sox attempt to move within one win of a world title...

1. Get to Adam Wainwright early -- again.
The Sox can't expect to jump on Wainwright the way they did in Game 1, when an error by shortstop Pete Kozma enabled a three-run rally, then Boston tacked on two more in the second thanks in part to more sloppy St. Louis defense. But they may still get their best opportunities early.

Wainwright posted a 6.09 ERA and allowed opponents to bat .326 against him in the first inning this season, both by far the worst numbers of any frame. His ERA was a rather pedestrian 3.92 over the first three innings, but then dropped to 2.49 in innings 4-6, and 1.67 in innings 7-9.

Seven times this season he's surrendered at least four runs in an outing -- and on five of those occasions the opponents struck for at least one in the opening frame. The Sox have started games notoriously slowly throughout this postseason, but Monday night it's important that they score early not only because it's when the ace-like Wainwright is most vulnerable, but because after two taxing contests they do not want to put themselves in a position where for the sake of offense they need to pinch-hit for starting pitcher Jon Lester earlier than they'd prefer.

2. Lester needs to go deep in the game.
Felix Doubront has thrown almost five innings the past two nights, Koji Uehara and Junichi Tazawa have pitched in both of those games, as well, Craig Breslow has struggled lately, Franklin Morales isn't reliable in high-leverage spots, and with no off-day between it's unlikely a starter could come to the rescue like John Lackey did in Game 4.

Therefore the Boston bullpen in the middle innings is basically Brandon Workman and the little-used Ryan Dempster, so it would be enormous if Lester was able to come anywhere close to the 7.2 innings he completed in Game 1, or even to pitch into the seventh inning, as he has in three of his four postseason starts.

The one outlier was his outing in Detroit, where he allowed seven hits and two runs over 5.1 innings, and what's a bit concerning about that one is that it's the only start Lester has made during these playoffs on the normal four days of rest. During the regular season, Lester's ERA was 4.24 with four days between starts -- and 2.91 with five days between appearances.

He takes the mound in Game 5 just four days removed from his previous game.

3. Play good defense.
This should be a given in a matchup of the two best teams in baseball, but thus far the momentum of this series has swung toward whichever team was sharper with its gloves. Just make the routine plays, make smart decisions defensively, and not beat themselves with mistakes, they should be in a good position.

The Cardinals have yet to beat them without being aided greatly by an errant throw that skipped down the left-field line. Perhaps Uehara's pickoff of Kolten Wong to end Game 4 is an indication of the defensive headiness to come for Boston.

4. Do a better job with the bottom of the Cardinals' lineup.
David Freese, Daniel Descalso, Jon Jay, and Kozma have in some combination comprised the Nos. 6-8 spots in the Cardinals' lineup the past couple of games. And combined they're 3-for-39 in the series.

But despite that .077 average, Red Sox pitching has issued eight walks to those four batters, and in doing so has put itself in positions where it's forced to reckon with the likes of Carlos Beltran and Matt Holliday more often than it might otherwise. Particularly in National League rules, a walk to that part of the order could mean the difference between the Cardinals getting to begin the next inning with their leadoff man or with their pitcher, so even when the walks don't lead directly to runs, they do have consequences.

For Game 5 in particular, Shane Robinson will sub in for Jay against the left-handed Lester, and he'll hit second, so first baseman Matt Adams slide down to seventh. He's got some pop -- but the point remains. He's 3-for-17 in the series, and he hit .208 against southpaws this season. He's a guy the Sox should get out.

5. Protect David Ortiz.
With Shane Victorino missing his second straight games with a back issue, and the No. 2 hole thus vacated, John Farrell shuffled his lineup up a bit in an effort to give David Ortiz some additional protection after the Cardinals began to suggest they're done pitching to the slugger who's batting .727 in the series.

Dustin Pedroia will bat second, and Ortiz will bat third, so it'll be up to Jonny Gomes (batting fourth) and Daniel Nava (batting fifth) to make sure Big Papi gets his pitches. They've both done that job thus far in this series, with Gomes following an Ortiz walk with a three-run homer on Sunday, and Nava driving in two runs when batting right behind Ortiz in Saturday's game -- but St. Louis is still likely to make those two outfielders prove they can do so against Wainwright before the big righty gives Ortiz a chance to beat him.

Huge homers in big spots continue to help Red Sox win games

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 28, 2013 11:30 AM

By the organization's own recent standards, the Red Sox weren't a team that hit a lot of home runs for much of this season. They finished with 178, which ranked fifth in the American League, but that was buoyed by the 39 they hit in September, and the eight they hit on a single night against Detroit. But through 140 games they'd gone deep 140 times, and no Boston team has slugged as few as a homer per game since Butch Hobson's underwhelming bunch in 1993.

In the postseason, the homers have -- naturally, given the quality of the competition standing on the mound -- been even fewer and farther between. During the regular season, the Sox averaged a homer every 31.7 at-bats; this postseason it's been every 50.3 at-bats.

But, as they say, timing is everything.

When the Cardinals blatantly pitched around David Ortiz in the sixth inning of a tie game Sunday night -- despite the fact that Dustin Pedroia already occupied first base -- and Jonny Gomes sent a 387-foot blast to the visitors' bullpen, the emergency left fielder not only gave Boston a 4-1 lead, but he presented the latest example of the decisive weapon the long ball has been for the Sox during this postseason.

The simplest way to put it is this: In these playoffs, the Red Sox are 7-1 when they homer in a game; they're just 2-4 when they don't.

And looking at those blasts a little bit closer, Baseball-Reference's win expectancy calculations show that Boston's home runs haven't merely been part of those victories, they've been among the primary reasons why the club is just two triumphs away from celebrating a World Series championship.

The calculations aim to figure out how much the result of each play in a game changes a team's probability of winning that contest, based on the score and the situation at the point the play begins and when the play ends.

For example, Gomes' circuit clout Sunday night improved the Red Sox' probability of winning from 49 percent to 87 percent. In one mighty swing, he improved his team's chance of winning by 38 percent.

And that's been the way these Sox have been getting it done of late. Thus far in the postseason, the Sox have notched six hits that improved their win expectancy by at least 20 percent -- and five of those have been homers. Meanwhile, four hits have improved their likelihood by at least 33 percent. And all four of them have left the yard.

Sox HRFive of their nine blasts this postseason have taken the Sox from a probability of 50-50 or worse to a point where they were favored. One rather famously tied the game -- David Ortiz's Game 2 grand slam in the ALCS -- while Gomes' shot Sunday was the sixth that has given the Sox the lead, and the third that has ultimately supplied the game-winning run.

Conversely, only two of their homers have impacted the Sox' win probability by less than 5 percent. In both of those cases, they came in the late innings, during an at-bat Boston began with a 94 percent likelihood of winning anyway. And the only time they've lost when homering was Game 2 of this series against St. Louis, when the Cardinals used the Sox' defensive sloppiness to comeback against the bullpen.

Maybe it's a coincidence. But maybe -- particularly in conjunction with the characteristics this team has shown all year -- it's not. All year this team has been the type that has thrived in the moment, that has battled resiliently. It's a team that has been defined by its relentlessness, its flair for the dramatic, and its willingness to fight. It's a team that hasn't hit a ton of home runs, but when it's been pushed up against the wall, it's come out swinging.

And, this postseason, swinging for the fences.

5 keys for Game 4 of the World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 27, 2013 01:00 PM

It'll be a while before Red Sox Nation moves on from the wild finish to an exhilarating Game 3, but we try by looking ahead to the keys for Game 4.

1. Better manage the conditions of playing under NL rules.
As the series shifted from Boston to St. Louis, and from American League rules to National League rules, the assumption was that the biggest problem it would create for the Red Sox would be the loss of the designated hitter in the middle of their lineup.

In Game 3, however, the disadvantage appeared to be biggest in the dugout, where John Farrell -- who has never coached for or managed an NL team -- made a sequence of crucial mistakes that made him and his coaching staff look unable to keep up with the speed of the game as conditions changed in the late innings.

Individual moves can be second-guessed, and there was plenty to question in that regard, so whether it was wise to lift defensive asset Stephen Drew in the seventh inning of a tie game, or to pinch-hit for Felix Doubront with nobody on and two out while the pitcher was rolling, or to not use Mike Napoli at any point can all be justified.

But the most damning indication that the Sox staff was unprepared was the mistake Farrell admitted to afterward. With reliever Brandon Workman due up second in the ninth inning, and the game tied, there was an obvious and easy opportunity for the Sox to avoid having to have Workman come to bat -- and, in fact, it would've also left Boston with better defense behind the plate and its best relief pitcher on the mound. It was a win-win-win.

Jarrod Saltalamacchia had made the last out of the eighth, so all the Sox had to do was hit either Napoli (if they deemed that the moment for him) or David Ross (if they didn't want to burn two players in one move), and then execute a double-switch by bringing in Koji Uehara and inserting him into the lineup in Saltalamacchia's spot. Putting him there would've delayed the pitcher coming due for another inning or two.

It was a rudimentary managerial maneuver, and one Farrell wanted to have back as soon as the game was over. Maybe that means he learned his lesson, and will be better after experiencing the World Series at that speed in Game 3 -- and Red Sox fans had better hope he did, because if the strategy isn't better in Games 4 and 5, there's a chance this team won't play under AL rules again until the spring.

2. Buchholz must give everything he has -- without trying to give more.
Whatever the right-hander's physical condition is at this point, the only thing that matters is that he gives the Red Sox everything that he has. The team is hoping for at least five, based on the fact he's been solid for that long in each of his three previous starts, but even if it's only three or four he has to find a way to gut his way through those frames and manage the situation.

On the flip side, though, they shouldn't ask Buchholz to pitch beyond himself. He's made abundantly clear over the course of dealing with his neck and shoulder injury this season that he doesn't feel he can be effective when he's less than 100 percent, so it might actually put the Sox in a worse position if he were to go out there and try to pitch outside of his comfort zone just for the sake of proving something or saving face.

That approach to a challenge might work for some people, but Buchholz hasn't said anything that suggests he has the confidence necessary for him to be one of those. If he doesn't have it, he has to be honest and realistic about his limitations, or else he might put the team in a worse position than if he didn't pitch at all.

3. Score early.
Game 3 marked the fifth time in 13 postseason games that the Red Sox were held hitless the first time through the batting order. Game 1 of this series showed how different it is to play from ahead, rather than being forced to catch up or constantly playing under the mounting pressure of a tight or tied playoff game.

Given the way Saturday night ended, and the fact they're now trailing this series, it'd especially important Sunday if the Sox were able to jump out with a crooked number early. With a couple big hits they could take some of the heat off their manager, their pitchers, and the bottom of their order. All that could be huge in tilting the series back to their favor.

4. Hit Lance Lynn's fastball.
The Cardinals' starter relies heavily on his heater, and he's generally effective in doing so, holding opponents to a .246 average this season while striking out about a batter an inning.

But the Red Sox were far and away the best fastball-hitting team in baseball this season, so the opportunity should be there for them to either capitalize or force Lynn out of his comfort zone. Also worth pointing out is that the Pirates were the fifth-most productive team in the majors when hitting fastballs -- and they ousted Lynn after tagging him with five runs in 4.1 innings during the Division Series.

5. Respond.
This one is easy. All year long the Red Sox have professed to be resilient and relentless. Now their backs are against the wall, and they were pushed into that position in an historically frustrating fashion.

It's time to prove those characteristics are real.

Whether obstruction or the 'Tuck Rule,' rules are rules, like them or not

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 27, 2013 07:00 AM

It was late, and it had been a draining night of curious decisions and dicey situations, but Red Sox fans running on some combination of adrenaline and disbelief turned their televisions to NESN, or wherever, and listened as Joe Torre and three umpires sat before the microphones to explain a call that will live in World Series history forever.

Having already scurried to find baseball's rule book online, they scrutinized everything those officials had to say, as if hoping to hear evidence that the ruling was indeed as wrong as it felt to them. And based on the way Twitter exploded with each explanation, they didn't like that deciding umpire Jim Joyce initially said Will Middlebrooks' feet caused Allen Craig to trip, then contradicted himself by saying "the feet didn't play too much into that;" they didn't like hearing that there was essentially nothing Middlebrooks could've done to avoid the call after diving into the runner in his effort to catch the ball; they didn't like being told that Craig was running "literally on the chalk" when in reality the path he took to collide with Middlebrooks was actually several feet inside the foul line; and they didn't seem to like the idea that intent was irrelevant.

But when the umpires were finished, even without a completely clear explanation, the fact remained: It was the right call, based on the letter of the law.

So, Red Sox Nation, meet Raider Nation – your new brothers in rules-based outrage.

Followers of the New England sports scene need no reminder of why the Raiders feel they were wronged back in the postseason following the 2001 football season, but if you need a reminder, open up a new tab and type “Tuck Rule” into Google. Go ahead. We’ll wait.

Okay. Now that everybody’s on the same page, we can all agree that under the NFL rules at the time, referee Walt Coleman was correct in ruling the way he did upon reviewing the for-a-moment fumble Charles Woodson forced on a blitz of Tom Brady. Following the rule exactly how it was written, the result of the play was an incomplete pass.

Regardless of whether it was fair, whether the act of tucking the ball back into the body should be considered part of the throwing process, whether that’s actually what Brady was intending to do, or whether you think the rule is flat-out ridiculous, it was the rule in place when that game began. Therefore, its edicts govern the officials’ decisions during that contest.

And the same is true of what happened on Saturday night in St. Louis. It doesn’t seem fair that if Middlebrooks gets tangled with a runner when sprawling out to try and glove an errant throw he gets penalized for it if the runner then attempts to run. Essentially there was absolutely nothing he could to avoid the call once the ball got past him, and the umpires said as much afterward.

It doesn’t seem logical that the way the rule is written, if the fielder “continues to lie on the ground and delays the progress of the runner, very likely has obstructed the runner,” but the umpires said afterward that Middlebrooks could not have tried to get up.

It doesn’t seem right that Craig could embellish the collision by reaching out and pushing Middlebrooks with his hands, but players are taught to try and touch a fielder – more often in a hopeless rundown – because the rule is written to side with the runner in the case of contact. It doesn’t seem to make sense that there’s no judgment made on intent, and thus no allowance for incidental contact. It doesn’t seem just that the fielder is penalized for where his body happened to take him while trying to make a play, while the runner was allowed to run on the grass inside the baseline – and thus have no choice but to run over the third baseman – just because his body bounced in that direction after his popup slide.

But according to the way the rule is written, that’s the way it goes. Joyce made the right call. The Cardinals would’ve had a major gripe if he hadn’t. So the Red Sox lose. Fair and square.

Perhaps the rule will be revisited and rewritten, or at least clarified to answer some of the questions coming out of a high-profile, real-world example. Major League Baseball added language after a 2003 obstruction call involving Miguel Cabrera – and the NFL eventually went back and revised the Tuck Rule more than a decade after it was most famously enacted. Of course, that’s done little to calm the Raider fans for whom the incident still strikes a nerve, and who still carry a grudge – and Red Sox fans are likely to the same for a while, too.

Though let’s not lose sight of one reality while seeing red. Even after that call, the Raiders still had a chance to win the game. They still led that Divisional playoff, and they still had a chance to keep the Patriots from getting into field goal position. Then, even after Adam Vinatieri booted the greatest kick in NFL history through a driving snowstorm, Oakland had a chance to stop the Patriots from getting back into field goal range for another kick during overtime.

And the Red Sox still have an opportunity to win this World Series. That play might’ve cost them a chance to go up a game, but St. Louis’ advantage is still just 2-1. This is a team that has prided itself on its resiliency and relentlessness, and on its win-the-next-day mentality, so there’s every reason to think this will ultimately be remembered as just a wildly unexpected speed bump. Win Sunday or Monday and they will restore home-field advantage, and get a chance to go back to Fenway Park needing two victories to win a championship.

The latter of those would come on Halloween, in fact. Perfect. Their new brethren from Oakland would fit right in to the party.

5 keys for Game 3 of the World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 26, 2013 11:30 AM

With the World Series down to a best-of-five as the Red Sox and Cardinals take the festivities to Busch Stadium, here's a look at five keys for Boston in Saturday night's Game 3...

1. Get something from the bottom of the lineup.
Since Mike Napoli's three-run double in the first inning of Game 1, the Nos. 5-9 spots in the Red Sox lineup have combined to go 2-for-33 (0.61) -- and one of those hits was the Stephen Drew popup that fell between befuddled pitcher Adam Wainwright and catcher Yadier Molina early in the series opener.

Throw in a couple of walks and a sacrifice fly, and that half of the Sox lineup has reached base at a .111 clip against the Cardinals over that same span, and what's scary is the bottom of the order is about to be thinned out even further. Saturday night they'll put Jake Peavy into that portion of the lineup, while removing Napoli, because the National League doesn't allow the designated hitter. It'll stay that way through Game 5.

Obviously the Sox survived the struggles of their lower-half to win Game 1, but Game 2 showed why that might not be sustainable. Against a team with a bullpen as talented as St. Louis' is, a team can't afford to give away innings, or even at-bats. It's going to be difficult for the Sox to score late in games, so it's imperative that they keep the line moving, and turn the lineup over frequently enough that their big bats have a chance to do damage. Those batters in the 6, 7, and 8 spots don't necessarily need to drive in runs, or score themselves -- but every time they draw a walk or get a hit, the Sox get one batter closer to Dustin Pedroia and David Ortiz, both of whom are hot.

In an effort to help that, John Farrell will use Daniel Nava -- he of the eighth-best average and fifth-best OBP in the AL this season -- as his left fielder for Game 3. And while Drew might look like a lost cause at this point in what's been a dreadful postseason offensively, here's one reason to think he could come around:

Before going 3-for-4 with a double and a triple on May 26, Drew was 1 for his previous 24. Before going 4-for-5 with a homer and two doubles on June 4, he was 2 for 23. Before going 3-for-5 on June 21, he was 7 for 47. And before going 3-for-4 with two homers and five RBIs on July 27, he was 1 for 15.

The point is, Drew has shown a tendency to bust out of slumps in a big, bold way. The Sox can't expect that to happen Saturday -- but, if it does, it might be exactly what they need to win Game 3.

2. Peavy must harness his emotions, make adjustments, and battle.
One quote sums up a lot of what will factor into Peavy's performance Saturday night, when he takes the mound for the first time since the Tigers touched him for seven runs over three-plus innings in the ALCS.

"Everything is fixed, fixable," he said Friday. "It wasn't too much to read into it, really. People want to make it ‑‑ just a small, small adjustment that can make all the difference in the world. And there's absolutely no excuses tomorrow night. This is what I've lived for my whole life is to ‑‑ my whole baseball career, I should say -- to have this opportunity to go out there on the biggest stage and have a chance to help your team win a World Series game and a World Series title."

He's had 10 days to identify and make the adjustments, so now it's a matter of executing, and keeping himself under control. When he says that he's been working toward this opportunity his entire life, the hope is obviously that he'll use that focus and motivation for good.

But with a guy as intense, as self-critical, as emotional as Peavy, there's also the risk that it gets in the way of him simply making pitches. A four-pitch, bases-loaded walk to a floundering Austin Jackson was evidence that the moment maybe got to him a bit against Detroit, so he's got to find a way to rein it in a bit better at Busch Stadium. He's got to find a way to keep his team -- and himself -- in the game.

Particularly with Clay Buchholz' stamina a serious question for Sunday, the Sox simply can't afford to see their bullpen taxed on Saturday night.

3. Be careful with Matt Holliday.
The Cardinals' left fielder has a homer and a triple in this series so far, continuing a torrid stretch that's seen him hit .333 with 29 RBIs in 36 games since the start of September, and making him the biggest threat in a Cardinal lineup featuring a bruised Carlos Beltran and absent Allen Craig.

Holliday has a history of success against Peavy, too, dating back to their days as counterparts in the National League West. In 38 plate appearances, Holliday is 8-for-28, with a .286 batting average and a .474 on-base percentage -- thanks in large part to 10 walks.

That says Peavy has either preferred to pitch around Holliday, or his stuff doesn't fool the slugger into chasing -- and the reality is probably a combination of both. Regardless, not giving Holliday much to hit wouldn't be a bad strategy for the Sox in their next encounters.

4. Be patient, and put the ball in play against Joe Kelly.
After facing so many strikeout pitchers this postseason, and setting a record for whiffs in the ALCS, the right-handed Kelly presents the Sox with a difference type of challenge.

He throws hard, with a two-seamer that sits close to 95 mph, but it's not an overpowering heater, as evidenced by his rate of 5.7 strikeouts per inning this season, and there's not a lot of variety in his approach. Two of every three pitches is a fastball, which is fine if he can spot it effectively -- but, like his strikeout rate, his 3.2 walks per nine inning rate is also worse than average.

The Red Sox are a lineup built to punish a pitcher for being predictable and for not commanding, so if they can remain patient and disciplined, Kelly is a guy they could create opportunities against. He's good at getting out of trouble, which explains his 2.69 ERA despite a 1.35 WHIP, but Boston will take its chances if it's repeatedly one hit away from denting the scoreboard.

5. Use the bench.
Given the slumps plaguing the bottom of the order, given the NL rules requiring the pitcher to hit, and given the fact that, lest we forget, it was a major strength for the Sox throughout the regular season, John Farrell should consider being more aggressive with the way he uses his bench while the series is in St. Louis.

Remember, the Sox tied a team record with seven pinch-hit home runs this season, and their reserves matched the Phillies’ for the most homers off the bench in baseball. Boston's reserves were also second in slugging percentage, and fourth in on-base percentage, leading to the third-best OPS in the majors (.799) – while the Cardinals’ was the third-worst (.519).

Now Napoli joins that mix, as does Gomes, who Farrell trusted enough to start the first two games. Will Middlebrooks is another right-hander, and Mike Carp is available from the left side. There's power there, and if nothing else making a substitution here or there could force Mike Matheny to rethink the way he orchestrates things in his bullpen, if it doesn't succeed in creating a more favorable matchup.

Welcome to the Little League World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 25, 2013 07:00 AM

The place looked a bit different than Williamsport, the weather was far chillier than expected for late August, and someone is going to need to check the birth certificates on those boys with the beards. There's no way they're 12 years old, and this is the Little League World Series, right? It's got to be.

Don't be fooled by the cityscape climbing beyond the stadium walls. Or the October-like crispness in the air. Or the facial hair of the players swinging wooden bats, wearing metal spikes, and chewing tobacco. Just look at the field. It says "World Series" on the grass behind home plate -- and games are being decided on plays that make we adults hear the voices of the coaches who taught us in our own fundamental-formative, pre-teen practices.

Look the ball into the glove! we heard in the first inning Wednesday, when shortstop Pete Kozma failed to catch a routine flip from second baseman Matt Carpenter as he moved toward the second base bag, taking his eyes off the ball with the runner bearing down on him as he hurried to turn a David Ortiz' grounder into two outs and ignored another basic instruction: Make sure of one!

That situation eventually cost the Cardinals three runs, and an inning later a pop-up that landed between a pitcher and catcher left exasperatedly staring at each other -- Call it! Communicate! -- opened the door for a rally that scored two more. Trailing 5-0 after two frames the Cards could never cut into that gap, and so those fundamental flubs ultimately cost them Wednesday's Game 1 by a count of 8-1.

But then Thursday the Red Sox returned the gifts. After David Ortiz crushed a two-run homer over the wall in left -- the biggest kids always seem to go deep in the Little League World Series, don't they? -- the Sox took a lead into the seventh inning, with their best relievers lined up and Koji Uehara waiting at the end to protect what was a 2-1 advantage.

Those youth coaches wouldn't keep quiet, though, and started yelling again as soon as Matt Carpenter's bases loaded fly to left landed in the glove of Jonny Gomes, and Kozma came dashing toward the plate after tagging from third.

Hit the cutoff man!

With a one-run lead, an outfielder's first instinct when he catches a medium-depth flyball with one out and a man on third is obviously to fire home in an effort to keep the run from scoring. So nobody can begrudge Gomes for coming up gunning, and trying to throw out Kozma.

Except that here's how Gomes described the challenge he faced on that particular play: "Had to swing my body all the way around, had a strong throw, and it skipped away from Salty. That would've been a tough, tough, tough play to get him out at home."

On such a tough -- tough, tough -- play, then, the left fielder has to account for more than just the guy tagging at third. There were two other baserunners active on the play, when the play began the Red Sox were leading, and it was only the seventh inning. In the best-case scenario he throws the runner out, of course, but in attempting to do so he needs to also do whatever he can to make sure that the worst-case scenario is a tie game, with two outs and men on first and second.

The way to do that is hitting the cutoff man, letting Jarrod Saltalamacchia judge the runner's progress before telling Xander Bogaerts whether to cut the ball or let it go through, and manage the risk. Especially when the best-case scenario play was of such a high degree of difficulty, that's the proper execution. Instead, he aired it out. And the throw went a bit up the first base line.

Come off the base to catch the ball!

Part of managing risk is up to Saltalamacchia there, too. Once Gomes sails the cutoff man, his primary responsibility is to catch the ball. Not to block the plate, not to make a tag. His job is to catch the ball. And he didn't do it.

Instead of leaving the plate to catch the ball, or at least keep it in front of him, he tried to hold his ground and reach for the throw. When he extended, it made for a difficult catch, and he didn't make it. The ball clanged off his glove. It rolled behind him, where pitcher Craig Breslow picked it up, and saw Jon Jay breaking for third.

Don't throw the ball around!

Jay didn't do a good job reading the ball off the bat, so as Gomes was uncorking toward the plate, Jay was diving back into second base. He sprung up quickly when he saw where the ball was headed, crept a little farther when he noticed the cutoff man wasn't going to be in play, and broke into a full-out sprint when the ball got past Saltalamacchia.

If Breslow couldn't scooped and thrown quickly, he might've had a shot to get Jay heading for third. But he couldn't. Rather, the reliever retrieved the ball and had to take a sideways crow hop to clear the catcher from his throwing lane. Once he did this he had no shot at nabbing Jay, even with a perfect throw.

He should've put it in his back pocket and focused on what to do with Carlos Beltran. Instead he fired over the head of Stephen Drew, and into the seats on a bounce. Suddenly the Sox were down 3-2 with a runner at third, then Beltran needed only flair a single into right to give the Red Birds an insurance score.

That's where the game ended, 4-2, tying the series at a game apiece, and turning the United States' championship into a best-of-five.

No word yet on who will emerge from the international bracket.

5 keys for Game 2 of the World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 24, 2013 12:00 PM

Looking at five facets that could factor prominently into the Red Sox' quest to go up 2-0 in the World Series, fairly confident that none involve ill-advised 3-pointers followed, or a little shimmy. "Wacha" and "Walker" aren't actually the same, despite our regional pronunciations...

1. Make Wacha wiggle a little bit.
Michael Wacha's meteoric rise is one of baseball's more remarkable stories in recent memory, as just 16 months after being drafted with the No. 19 overall pick he dominated the National League portion of the postseason, and will make his first start since winning NLCS honors when his Cardinals look to rebound against the Red Sox in Thursday's Game 2 of the World Series.

Wacha's numbers are ridiculous. In 21 innings he's allowed eight hits and one run, that coming on a solo homer that busted up a no-hitter in the eighth inning of a game in which Pittsburgh had a chance to eliminate St. Louis. He also came up one out shy of pitching a no-no in his final start of the regular season, losing it when Washington's Ryan Zimmerman beat out a grounder to short.

At 22 years old, he's made it look absurdly easy. But what we don't know for sure is how he'll respond in a playoff game when things gets difficult.

Through his first three starts, there's only been two innings in which he's allowed more than one baserunner. Of the 19 innings he's finished, he's retired the side in order 14 times. Only once has he faced more than four batters before getting back to the dugout.

So, yes, he won a 2-1 game when the Cardinals had their backs pressed up against the wall by the Pirates. Yes, he won a 1-0 decision in his first start of the NLCS. And, yes, he pitched a shutout during the pennant clincher in which he was opposed by Cy Young favorite Clayton Kershaw.

But Wacha hasn't yet been forced to really make pitches to stunt a rally or stem momentum or minimize damage. Only once -- when he faced six batters and loaded the bases with an intentional walk -- has he had to pitch his way out of a jam. He hasn't had to work around defensive letdowns or stay effective while laboring. Obviously the primary reason for that is because it's been extremely difficult for offenses to gain those advantages against him -- but the Red Sox have a way of making pitchers uncomfortable. Especially at Fenway Park, they have a way of grinding down the best of the best.

And, if they're able to do make him squirm a bit in Game 2, Wacha's response will say a lot about whether he truly belongs in that class.

2. Lackey needs to mix and locate.
As John Lackey returns to the mound for the first time since outdueling Justin Verlander in Detroit, he looks to duplicate that dazzling performance. Not just in terms of results, but in terms of recipe, too.

What stood out most from Lackey's 6.2 shutout innings against the Tigers was his ability to throw strikes without leaving the ball over the middle of the plate -- look at this -- and his ability to keep hitters off balance by varying his pitch selection. He used his secondary pitches rather than rely to heavily on his fastball.

In featuring 38 cutters and 15 curveballs, according to BrooksBaseball.net, Jon Lester's performance in Wednesday's Game 1 was similarly effective in that regard. And the data suggests that will be the way to attack the Cardinals all series. They're among baseball's 10 best offenses when hitting the fastball, but the more offspeed the pitch, the more average (or even below-average) they become.

Lackey doesn't have the velocity he had back in April, in his first few starts after returning from Tommy John Surgery. He's not going to blow away these St. Louis hitters. But if he mixes and locates, he won't have to.

3. Get on ahead of Napoli.
John Farrell makes no secret what Sox fans have known since April: With Mike Napoli, you're going to have to put up with the peaks and valleys that come with such a streaky hitter.

But Sox fans should also know by now that Napoli craves the big moment. He said as much on Wednesday, when asked about his career 1.104 OPS in the World Series -- "I love this stage. It's in the spotlight. I really enjoy this time of year" -- and it was on full display during the regular season when he came to bat with the bases loaded, batting .458 with three grand slams, 31 RBIs, and a 1.480 OPS in 25 such opportunities.

He affirmed that production once more with a three-run double in the first inning Wednesday, so if the top of the Red Sox lineup can continue to set him up with these chances to get a big hit in a big spot in a big game, his track record suggests both he and the club should feel good about having the bat in his hands at that moment.

And there were indications in Game 1 that the guys hitting ahead of him might just give him those chances. Both Dustin Pedroia and David Ortiz had two hits, while Jacoby Ellsbury has been good throughout the postseason and Shane Victorino looked better (despite going 0-for-4) than he did in the Detroit series.

4. Trust the scouts.
Will Middlebrooks played Legion ball with Wacha, but none of the Sox have faced the Cardinals pitcher, obviously. And, conversely, none of the Cardinals have ever got a hit off of Lackey. (Matt Holliday is 0-for-7 lifetime, while Carlos Beltran is 0-for-9.)

So there'll be a lot of first encounters playing out in Game 2, which should put a heavy emphasis on the information provided by the teams' scouts and disseminated by the leaders of those staffs, as well as the coaches. They are the folks who have seen the Cardinals in person and have the best idea about where St. Louis may be prone to attack -- and in the case of a guy like Wacha, who has only recently burst on the scene, they may need to make those assessments with limited info.

The Red Sox organization honored their collection of scouts and minor-league coaches Wednesday night by giving them and their wives tickets to sit in the center field bleachers, and by asking the Fenway sellout to give them all a round of applause during one of the between-innings breaks. But back behind the scenes, that group may give those fans even more of a reason to cheer in Game 2.

5. Be ready for a better effort from the Cardinals.
To a man, the Red Sox insisted in the clubhouse after Game 1 that the Cardinals are a much better team than they showed Wednesday. St. Louis Manager Mike Matheny went so far as to say his players were "embarrassed."

So Boston should be prepared for a sharper, more focused, more urgent performance from the Cardinals on Thursday, particularly at the start of the game when they'll be trying to change the tenor of the series and swing some of its momentum in their favor.

At the very least, it's unlikely the Sox will be able to count on the Cards making three more errors and a couple other costly misplays -- and when Game 1 is reconsidered with those factors removed from the equation, there probably wasn't as much difference between the two teams as an 8-1 score would usually indicate. Boston had eight hits, St. Louis had seven. Boston had three extra-base hits, St. Louis had two. Both teams drew one walk.

This was always expected to be a tight series, between baseball's two best teams, and Thursday night's game is likely to be more reflective of that than Wednesday was. The Red Sox have to be ready for that. And seven months of evidence suggests that they will.

Beyond the box score, World Series Game 1

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 24, 2013 01:00 AM
BEYOND THE BOX SCORE
Red Sox 8, Cardinals 1; Red Sox lead series, 1-0
Hitters
8-for-33, BB, 7 K, 2 2B, HR
Jacoby Ellsbury, CF 0-for-3, R, BB, K: By working Adam Wainwright for a leadoff walk, Ellsbury not only set the table for the Sox’ three-run first, he also reached base for the 12th time in his last 13 playoff games. In only three of those contests has he gone without scoring a run. That’s a tablesetter.
Shane Victorino,RF 0-for-4: The results weren’t exactly there, but Victorino looked a heck of a lot better at the plate Wednesday thana he did in the ALCS. In his first at-bat he stung a hard liner that Matt Holliday came charging in to catch in left, then in the seventh he had a hit taken away when first baseman Matt Adams got to a softer line drive in the hole. It was an encouraging 0-for-4 for Victorino. And suffice it to say, you may have seen him duplicate his post-grand slam histrionics had the bang-bang call gone his way and he’d thrown out David Freese from right field on Freese’s ninth-inning single.
Dustin Pedroia, 2B 2-for-4, 2 R, RBI: He started coming around toward the end of the ALCS, collecting four hits over the final three games, and it appeared to carry over. Pedroia singled in each of his first two at-bats, the latter making becoming the first Wainwright allowed this season after falling behind 3-0 in the count, and plating a run.
David Ortiz, DH 2-for-3, 2 R, 3 RBI, HR, SF : Talk about a good sign for the Red Sox offense. After struggling mightily in the Tigers’ series, Ortiz hit one ball that would’ve been out had Carlos Beltran not robbed him of a grand slam, then left nothing to chance by belting one over the bullpen. If the Cardinals’ plan was to use lefty reliever Kevin Siegrist to match up with Ortiz in this series, that bomb has to now have them doubting that idea at least a little bit. And don’t sleep on the hard single Ortiz slapped to left-center, either; that’s often an indication that he’s staying on the ball and locked in.
Mike Napoli, 1B 1-for-4, 3 RBI, 2B: Then with the Rangers, Napoli was a beast in the 2011 series against St. Louis -- as he reminded Cardinals fans with the frozen rope he sent to left-center in the first inning, which scooted to teh wall for a three-run double. It was his only hit of the night, but he did sting another shot to center in the seventh.
Jonny Gomes, LF 0-for-3: Lester made it a pretty stress-free night for the Red Sox outfield, but Gomes still managed to made everybody notice him. Completely leaving his feet, he made a diving catch to take a hit away from Matt Adams in the fifth. He then made everyone notice him again, when he fumbled the ball while retrieving a Matt Carpenter single -- but as is usually the case with Gomes, he didn’t hurt the team. As also usually seems to be the case, Daniel Nava got a hit when he got his turn, that coming when he pinch-hit for Gomes in the eighth.
Xander Bogaerts, 3B 0-for-3, RBI, SF, 2 K: He is human, after all. Bogaerts struck out twice and lined to short in his first three trips, but just when it looked like he might fail to make an impact on the game for the first time when given an opportunity this postseason, he crushed a liner to left that went as a sacrifice fly in the eighth.
Stephen Drew, SS 1-for-4, R, 2 K: Here’s what it said in the official game notes: “Stephen Drew singled in the second inning to snap a string of 11 consecutive at-bats without a hit. Dating back to Game 3 of the ALDS, Drew has gone 2-for-29.” The details of that single were conveniently omitted -- but when it’s going the way it’s been going for Drew, you take whatever you can get.
David Ross, C 1-for-4, R, 2 K: He had a hit, but that’s a bonus. Ross is in there for his ability to call a game and receive pitches -- both of which are why the Sox are 4-1 when he starts in these playoffs, and have yielded an average of just two runs per game in those five contests.
Pitchers
9 IP, ER, 7 H, BB, 10 K, HR
Jon Lester, SP 7.2 IP, 0 ER, 5 H, BB, 8 K: The lefty allowed less than four runs for the ninth time in 10 career postseason starts, and has now logged 13.1 World Series innings without yielding any runs. Thanks in no small part to a comebacker he induced from David Freese with one out and the bases loaded in the fourth, then turned into a 1-2-3 double play, his ERA in these playoffs is 1.67. And for his postseason career it’s now 2.22. By comparison, Curt Schilling’s was 2.23.
Junichi Tazawa, RP 0.1 IP, K: After Lester got the first two batters of the eighth, and pushed his pitch count to 112, Farrell summoned Tazawa to finish the inning. He did that quickly, striking out the only man he faced.
Ryan Dempster, RP IP, ER, 2 H, K, HR: It was a mop-up inning of little consequence to the outcome -- but, according to Gomes, it was hardly inconsequential for Dempster: “One of the really big things that happened tonight, you talk about a 15-year vet who’s wanted to play baseball since he was 4 years old. He gave up that homer (to Matt Holliday), gave up a hit after, but I don’t think anyone in here had the emotions and the grit and grind that he had. That was a pretty emotional moment when he was on that moment, and one of the coolest things I’ve seen in a long time.”

Sox turn usual first-inning problems into first-game problems for Cards' ace

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 24, 2013 12:56 AM

When Adam Wainwright settled in, and plowed through the entire Boston lineup with but one exception, the importance of what the Red Sox had done prior to that point became unmistakably clear.

When Wainwright surrendered just one hit over the third, fourth, and fifth innings, when he retired 10 of 11 over that span, and when he finally started to look like a perennial Cy Young candidate with an impressive postseason pedigree, it emphasized how critical it was in setting the tone and tenor of this World Series that the Sox capitalized on the opportunities they had to bury the Cardinals and their ace early on in a Game 1 they'd eventually win 8-1.

Those opportunities were afforded in part by some shoddy St. Louis defense, shortstop Pete Kozma completely missing a flip from second baseman Matt Carpenter to give away one out -- and maybe two -- then Kozma booting a bouncer in the hole, and Wainwright not exactly helping himself by miscommunicating with his catcher on a popup they let land safely between the plate and the mound.

It was uncharacteristic of a team that won 97 games during the regular season. And it couldn't come at a worse time in the game, according to the way Wainwright's starts tend to go.

His earned run average ranks third among all active pitchers, and he led the National League with 19 wins this season, so there's really not a good time to face him. But if there is a particular point in the game when the big right-hander is vulnerable, the numbers say it's early.

During the regular season, Wainwright's ERA in the first inning was 6.09, and opponents batted .326 against him with an .876 on-base plus slugging. No other frame was close, and after that opening inning his numbers fall to a 2.43 ERA, a .233 average, and a .591 OPS. So, basically, Wainwright is below average in the fourth -- but then he suddenly becomes one of baseball's best.

Opponents better get to him early, then, and that's exactly what the Red Sox did. Jacoby Ellsbury laid off a couple of two-strike curveballs to draw the second leadoff walk Wainwright has issued this season, then Dustin Pedroia followed a loud out from Shane Victorino with a single to center.

The Sox nearly blew their chance at that point, when David Ortiz bounced into what might've been a double play, but Kozma mishandled the throw and that brought Mike Napoli to bat with the bases loaded, and with a chance to make sure the Sox didn't let Wainwright off the hook. He did exactly that by lacing a double that rolled up against the base of the wall in left-center, and with that the Sox had a 3-0 lead.

"You've got to take advantage of those opportunities you get in a game," said Boston's first baseman. "We've been able to do that all playoffs. And that's what it's about. A lot of things went right for us, but we've got to take advantage of those opportunities and we did."

Napoli's three-run knock came on the 23rd pitch of the game -- and with Wainwright more hittable from pitch 1-25 than he is during any other 25-pitch increment throughout a start, their 3-0 lead stood as proof that the Sox had taken advantage of the opportunities they needed to take advantage of. Kozma's second error and the Cardinal battery's gift to the curators of the baseball bloopers reel opened the door to two more Red Sox runs in the second, but from there Wainwright figured things out, like he usually does. After Ortiz's grand slam was turned into a sacrifice fly on a terrific catch by Carlos Beltran, Wainwright allowed just one more baserunner over his final three innings of work.

But by then, by not having let that first inning go to waste, the Sox were already in control of the game. And -- for the moment, at least -- the series.

"You've got to do those things to win 97 games in the regular season, and definitely to win in the postseason," said Sox outfielder Jonny Gomes. "To sum it up, we do a really good job of that, but on the flip side we do a really good job of picking each other up and hiding our mistakes, too."

5 keys for Game 1 of the World Series

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 23, 2013 11:30 AM

Nine years to the day since Woody Williams opposed Tim Wakefield, Manny Ramirez went sliding into a sprinkler head, the teams were tied at 9 entering the bottom of the eighth -- and the Red Sox opened a four-game World Series sweep of the Cardinals, the same two teams return to Fenway Park for a rematch featuring baseball's two best teams.

Here's a look at five keys for the Red Sox going into Game 1, with no expectation that the final score will wind up anywhere near 11-9...

1. Don't expand the strike zone for Adam Wainwright.
The Cardinals' ace is one of the best pitchers in all of baseball, regardless of whether you put that list together with thinking from the old school (he led the NL with 19 wins) or the new (his xFIP of 2.80 was fourth in the big leagues). His career earned run average of 3.11 is the third best among active pitchers who've thrown at least 1,000 innings, and once Mariano Rivera's exit becomes official he'll slide up to second.

He presents a heck of a challenge for the Red Sox in Game 1, especially considering he can -- and will -- throw three plus pitches at any time. That unpredictability gives him an advantage in every encounter, right or left, scrub or star, and with that upperhand Wainwright does a terrific job of getting hitters to chase. In fact, according to Fangraphs, opposing batters swung at 36.2 percent of the pitches the right-hander threw outside of the strike zone during the regular season, which was third highest in the majors.

So it'll be important Wednesday night that the Sox don't play into Wainwright's strength by straying off the plate and expanding the strike zone. That'll be easier said than done, of course, considering the statistics suggest he has the second-best cutter and second-best curveball in all of baseball -- and with those come a lot of ugly swings. But Boston's best chance against Wainwright is to be disciplined, and try to get themselves in positions to capitalize on his comparatively average fastball when he's forced to throw it over the plate.

"The key for us is if we get pitches on the plate, in the middle of the plate somewhere, " Sox Manager John Farrell said, "is not to miss them."

They'd also be well served not to miss any early chances that present themselves. Wainwright's first-inning ERA this season was 6.09, and he's most hittable in his first 25 pitches; conversely, opponents hit .216 with a .544 OPS after pitch No. 100, better than any segment before that.

2. Jon Lester needs to capitalize on Cards' vulnerability to lefties.
The Cardinals clinched their trip to Boston by beating up on sensational southpaw Clayton Kershaw in Game 6 of the NLCS -- but that appears to be the aberration. Against left-handed pitching the Cardinals batted just .238 during the regular season, ranking 27th of baseball's 30 teams. Their .672 OPS was fifth-worst, and neither of those numbers changes much whether matched with a starter or a reliever.

Lester personally held lefties to a .237 average and a .670 OPS this season, so he has an arsenal that should play well against those deficiencies of a St. Louis lineup in which leadoff man Matt Carpenter (.294) is the only left-handed swinger who bats better than .231 against pitchers throwing from the same side. The righties aren't great, either, with Matt Holiday hitting only one homer against a lefty this season, Allen Craig posting an OBP of .311, and switch-hitter Carlos Beltran batting just .252 against southpaws.

Lester's biggest obstacle could be Yadier Molina, the catcher with an .883 OPS against lefties in 2013.

3. Keep Carpenter off the bases.
The Cards' second baseman scored 126 runs during the regular season, which was 17 more than any other player. For perspective on how important that was for St. Louis, consider that they went 32-41 when he didn't score a run -- compared to 65-24 when he did cross the plate.

He gave himself so many chances to score by accumulating a .392 OBP in the regular season, though in the NL Division Series the Pirates did a good job keeping him off the bases, and Carpenter scored only once. As a result, the Cardinals fell behind in that series and twice had to fend off elimination.

If Boston can duplicate what Pittsburgh did, it'll go a long way toward negating some of the boost St. Louis will get from the return of Allen Craig.

4. Put pressure on the defense.
If they didn't do it against a hobbling Miguel Cabrera, it's hard to envision the Red Sox often trying to bunt for hits in this series, or any other. And against baseball's active leader in caught stealing percentage for a catcher, Molina at 44.5 percent, it's hard to envision the Red Sox trying to swipe many bags.

But Boston can help itself by finding a way to keep pressure on the Cardinal defense. Baseball Info Solutions rated them as the second-worst defense in the National League according to its defensive runs saved metric, with particular weaknesses at third base and across the outfield, with David Freese, Matt Holliday, Carlos Beltran and Jon Jay all well below average.

St. Louis doesn't make a lot of errors, typically. If the Sox hit it at the Cardinals, generally the Cards will make the play. And they turned more double plays this season than all but one team. Yet if Boston can get them moving, and keep them challenged, it could create some additional opportunities for itself.

5. Keep doing what they've done to get here.
The Red Sox didn't hit much against Detroit -- but they came through when it counted, seized opportunities, pitched pretty well, and played good defense. That multidimensional ability is a big reason they won 97 games during the regular season, and if the players just continue to focus on doing their jobs and playing solid baseball for just one more round, Boston should like its chances.

"A lot of things that work in the regular season still work in the postseason," General Manager Ben Cherington said after his team won the ALCS. "The numbers may not look the same, but if you can have a quality at-bat in a tough situation, then you can have a quality at-bat in a tough situation. If you can make a defensive play when you need it, you can make a defensive play when you need it. If you can execute a pitch, you can execute a pitch.

"We've seen a lot of that in (the ALCS) in different spots. Even though some guys' numbers in the series were better than others, we've had contributions from just about everyone. We won games in different ways."

Wrapping up the ALCS, when contributions came in various forms for Sox

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 21, 2013 01:32 PM

To encapsulate the degree to which the Red Sox offense was limited by the Tigers' terrific pitching, consider that Boston's on-base percentage in the American League Championship Series was the same as its batting average during the regular season. Both were .277.

Likewise, the Sox scored two fewer runs per game in the ALCS than they did throughout the course of the year -- yet here they are, headed to the World Series for the third time in 10 seasons, and with a chance to become baseball's first three-time champion of this century. And to hear their general manager explain it, just because the numbers don't reflect it doesn't mean the recipe necessarily changed in the playoffs.

"A lot of things that work in the regular season still work in the postseason," Ben Cherington said. "The numbers may not look the same, but if you can have a quality at-bat in a tough situation, then you can have a quality at-bat in a tough situation. If you can make a defensive play when you need it, you can make a defensive play when you need it. If you can execute a pitch, you can execute a pitch.

"We've seen a lot of that in this series in different spots, even though some guys' numbers in the series were better than others, we've had contributions from just about everyone. We won games in different ways."

They won games with starting pitching, with timely hitting, with good work out of the bullpen, and with generally excellent defense. They did a little bit of a lot of things that help a team win when one area of strength may not be working -- and that bodes well moving forward against a Cardinal team that matched them for the most wins in the majors this season.

"The staff and the players have made sure we're balanced. They've made sure that we're good in the areas that are controllable," Cherington said. "You can control how good you are on the bases, and we've done that. To some extent, you can control how good you are defensively, and we've done that. There are some elements that are out of our control, but we've done a very good job of controlling the things we can control."

Let's look at where those contributions came from:

BEYOND THE ALCS BOX SCORE
Red Sox 4, Tigers 2
Hitters
39-for-193 (.202), 18 BB, 73 K, 11 2B, 3B, 4 HR, 5 SB
Jacoby Ellsbury, CF 7-for-22 (.318), .878 OPS, 3 R, 3 RBI, 2B, 3B, 4 BB, 6 K, 2 SB: Nobody will ever know how history might’ve been different had Jose Iglesias started a difficult -- though hardly impossible -- double play on the ground ball Ellsbury hit up the middle immediately before Victorino launched his game-winning grand slam. But that’s irrelevant now. What matters is that this was another good series for the center fielder, highlighted by a four hits in Game 4, a .423 OBP, and a go-ahead single early in Game 6. He’s now a .312 hitter in 122 career postseason plate appearances.
Shane Victorino,RF 3-for-24 (.125), .484 OPS, 2 R, 5 RBI, 2B, HR, 9 K, SB: Victorino has yet to draw a walk in the postseason, though he was hit by two more pitches in this series. Those now account for six of the 15 times he’s reached base in 45 plate appearances. But like J.D. Drew before him, all anyone will remember about the Red Sox right fielder’s ALCS run is one mighty swing in Game 6.
Dustin Pedroia, 2B 6-for-22 (.273), .703 OPS, R, RBI, 2B, 4 BB, 6 K, SB: His glove uncharacteristically let the Sox down in Game 4, when his failure to start a twin killing breathed life into a Tiger rally that became a big inning, and the Sox never recovered. However, as far as offense goes, the series ended encouragingly for Pedroia, who reached base twice in each of its final three games and had a hit in each.
David Ortiz, DH 2-for-22 (.091), .427 OPS, R, 4 RBI, HR, 3 BB, 4 K : If Jhonny Peralta was a capable left fielder, and took away Ortiz’s bloop hit in Detroit, the epic Game 2 grand slam would’ve been his only hit of the series. As it is, it led to his only run, only RBIs, only real contribution in a performance that signified the fourth time in his last five series that the “Greatest Clutch Hitter” in Red Sox history has batted .235 or worse, and failed to crack .700 with his OPS.
Mike Napoli, 1B 6-for-20 (.300), 1.033 OPS, 4 R, 2 RBI, 2 2B, 2 HR, BB, 11 K: If Uehara had stumbled at any point, Napoli probably would’ve been the ALCS MVP. Take away the bookends -- where he was 0-for-7 with six strikeouts -- and he had six hits in 13 trips, and four of them went for extra bases. As usual, it wasn’t the most consistent performance for the first baseman, though in the end the productivity was there.
Daniel Nava, LF 2-for-65 (.333), .762 OPS, BB, 3 K: By the end of the series Nava had lost the starting left fielder’s role to Jonny Gomes, with Farrell citing Gomes’s intangible contributions as a primary factor. But we wonder if the way Detroit pitched Nava in Game 4 had something to do with it. Nava’s greatest strength as a hitter is his ability to be patient, drive up a pitch count, and grind out at-bats. But after using 22 pitches to get through him in his first start, the Tigers threw him only strikes in his second appearance. They attacked him, and forced Nava to swing the bat. He’s capable in that spot, having posted the AL’s eighth-best average this season, but Gomes has a better chance of changing the game with one swing.
Jonny Gomes, LF 3-for-16 (.188), .438 OPS, 3 R, 2B, 7 K: His bigger contributions actually came defensively, as he made two nice catches and gunned down Miguel Cabrera at home plate early in Game 5, but he sure made his three hits count. The first was an infield safety that preceded him scoring the walkoff winner in Game 2, then he came within a couple inches of tying Game 6 himself in the seventh inning. Instead his shot to left hit just below the lip of the left-field wall, and he came in to score on Victorino’s salami. If nothing else, his flair for the spotlight should play well on baseball’s biggest stage.
Jarrod Saltalamacchia, C 3-for-16 (.188), .375 OPS, 2 RBI, 8 K: It has not been a good postseason for him offensively, as he’s now struck out in 15 of 27 plate appearances, and doesn’t have an extra-base hit since the opener against Tampa Bay. However, like the Tigers, the Cardinals have an all-righty starting rotation in the next round -- so it would be a huge boost for Boston if Saltalamacchia is a presence on the left side. Otherwise, David Ross might see an increased workload.
Stephen Drew, SS 1-for-20 (.050), .145 OPS, BB, 10 K: He looks completely ineffective at the plate, swinging right through hittable pitches -- but his contributions can’t be understated on the defensive side. The double play was a huge weapon for Sox pitchers in this series, and Drew is important there, and, frankly, he outplayed the wizard-like Iglesias defensively in this series. That was never more apparent than in the seventh inning of Game 6, when Drew ended the top half with a rangy diving play to prevent a run, then Iglesias booted the fairly routine Ellsbury chance that prolonged a decisive rally.
Will Middlebrooks, 3B 1-for-10 (.100), .300 OPS, R, 2B, 5 K: Just as he did during the regular season, he fell into a funk and it cost him his starting role. Xander Bogaerts had a lot to do with that, obviously, but Middlebrooks didn’t make much of a case for himself by being one of five Sox who struck out in at least half of their at-bats in the series. Keep an eye on him in the World Series, though: Particularly under National League rules, he may get chances to hit. And he has a knack for turning a perceived slight into power. The prediction here is that he homers against the Cardinals.
Xander Bogaerts, SS/3B 3-for-6 (.500), 1.667 OPS, 4 R, 3 2B, 3 BB, K: In 11 plate appearances this postseason, the 21-year-old rookie now has three doubles, five walks, and has scored seven runs. Not a bad way to splash onto the scene. And when you look at the strike zone plots of the two free passes he drew from Scherzer in Game 6, you’ll see that in both battles he took a pitch that was in the strike zone but called a ball -- including the 3-2 offering in the seventh. But looking at the whole game, you’ll also see that the home plate umpire was inconsistent in that down-and-away corner all night, and generally narrow. That could either be a sign that Bogaerts was aware of that night’s zone, or it’s a sign that the kid has already earned enough respect that even up against the presumptive Cy Young winner he already gets the benefit of the doubt. Either way, it’s darn impressive.
David Ross, C 2-for-4 (.500), .600 OPS, 2B, RBI, BB, K: Through three starts and four games, Ross is hitting .333 with a couple of doubles and a .956 OPS in 11 plate appearances. That’s good enough to merit his place in the lineup if Saltalamacchia continues to struggle at the plate and the Sox prefer to err on the side of defense behind it. Controlling the running game is more important against St. Louis than it was against Detroit, so the better thrower might be a better option, especially late in games.
Mike Carp, 1B/PH 0-for-5 (.000), 2 K: He got the start at first base in Game 2, but did nothing of substance with that opportunity. With Ortiz joining the mix at that position when the Sox play under NL rules, Carp isn’t likely to start again, but he could make a difference as a pinch-hitter.
Quintin Berry, PR 0-for-0, SB: The resident runner did his job -- again -- appearing in one game, and stealing a base. He’s 2-for-2 in that category this postseason, and 4-for-4 in his playoff career.
Pitchers
53 IP, 18 ER, 50 H, 18 BB, 42 K, 9 2B, 2 HR
Jon Lester, SP 11.2 IP, 13 H, 3 ER, 4 BB, 7 K: Lester made it eight times in nine career playoff starts that he’s yielded fewer than four earned runs, though the Tigers tested him. He averaged 1.46 walks and hits per inning, but pitched out of trouble well enough to keep the Sox in Game 1, and to win Game 5. Farrell would love to get more length out of Lester in the World Series, though he’d take a replication of these results, too.
Clay Buchholz, SP 10.2 IP, 12 H, 7 ER, 2 BB, 10 K: His 5.91 ERA was more than three times what his ERA was during the regular season -- though it appears to mostly be a fatigue issue. Only one of the runs Buchholz allowed in the series came during the first five frames, but in the sixth he faced a total of nine batters over two appearances, allowing six hits, a walk, and six runs. Farrell should have the hook in hand by that point in his next outing.
John Lackey, SP 6.2 IP, 4 H, 8 K: Going up against Justin Verlander with the series tied at a game apiece, he delivered his signature moment as a Red Sox. It’s as simple as that.
Jake Peavy, SP 3 IP, 5 H, 7 ER, 3 BB, K: It might’ve been different had Pedroia started the aforementioned double play in the second inning. But a veteran like Peavy has to find a way to pitch around predicaments like that, so he’s hardly absolved from blame. He did little to limit the damage, and Detroit made him pay for it.
Ryan Dempster, SP IP, H: He worked a scoreless inning in Game 4, and he’s now thrown just 18 pitches since the end of the regular season. That considered, if he was asked to come in for long relieve, you wonder how long he’d be able to go.
Brandon Workman, RP 4.2 IP, 3 H, 2 BB, 3 K: The righty was good in the series, making three appearances: he held the deficit in check during a scoreless inning in Game 2; he threw two innings after Peavy bombed in Game 4; then he got five outs, starting by stranding two inherited runners, in Game 6. Each time he was in by the sixth, so the Sox may not trust him later, but in big spots in the earlier middle innings, he is likely to be called upon.
Craig Breslow, RP 3.1 IP, H, 4 BB, 2 K: He allowed only one hit over four appearances, but his four free passes are a little bit concerning. He also walked five over 12 innings in September, and with Morales and Doubront the other options the Sox could really use at least one of their lefties to be reliable as a strikethrower.
Junichi Tazawa, RP 2.2 IP, ER, 4 H, K: The impression of Tazawa in the series is more positive than his numbers -- including a 1.5 WHIP -- because of the work he did in helping to handle Miguel Cabrera. The Sox felt they needed a power righty who can locate to handle the triple crown winner, and Tazawa was exactly that.
Franklin Morales, RP 1 IP, 2 H, BB: Get this: Morales’s ERA for the series was 0.00. That’s right. He may have walked Prince Fielder on four pitches after replacing Buchholz in Game 6, then surrendered a missile of a single to Victor Martinez before getting yanked, but Workman cleaned up the mess (thanks to some bad Tiger baserunning) and so Morales’ shutout inning in Game 4 is the only thing that really shows up on his personal stat line.
Koji Uehara, RP 6 IP, 4 H, 9 K: Winning one game and saving three others, Koji was just as expected. That a 0.00 ERA, a 0.67 WHIP, a 14.5 rate of strikeouts per nine innings, and an infinite strikeout-to-walk ratio has become the expectation tells you how good he has been this year. And why he was the ALCS MVP.

Six factors that could decide Game 6

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 19, 2013 10:15 AM

With the St. Louis Cardinals having made the Dodgers look rather Mickey Mouse-ish en route to a 9-0 annihilation of Los Angeles and ace Clayton Kershaw on Friday night, the National League's World Series representative has been established. And Red Sox fans are hoping the American League will follow suit quickly by also deciding its pennant in six games. 

Boston has a chance to arrange for a rematch of the 2004 World Series -- ceremonial first pitch from MVP Manny Ramirez, anyone? -- by beating Detroit tonight at Fenway Park, entering the contest with three one-run wins to their credit, and looking to avoid a winner-take-all against Justin Verlander by taking down this season's presumptive Cy Young winner, Max Scherzer, before it gets that far. 

Scherzer will obviously be an important piece of how things play out Saturday. But he's not alone. Here's a look at six factors that figure to play prominently in deciding Game 6:

1. Will Scherzer adjust? Or will Sox adjust to him?
As he prepared to face the Red Sox for the second time this series, and the third time at Fenway in the past seven weeks, the Tiger righty said it will be necessary for him to adapt his approach Saturday night because by now Boston has an idea of what to expect.

"They're familiar with what I did," he said. "Obviously they're going to be looking through the film and watching what I did, the sequences, patterns, when I threw off‑speed pitches, when I didn't.  Obviously I've got to be ahead of the curve. Obviously I don't know exactly what I'm going to do.  But there will be things I do differently."

In holding the Sox to one run in seven innings, Scherzer's best weapon was his slider. He threw it 17 times, and not once did Boston's hitters put it in play. They swung and missed nine times (53 percent), and he registered six strikeouts with the pitch that opponents hit .132 against this season.

He used it 45 percent of the time he had two strikes on a right-handed hitter -- but that usage was hardly different than the way he employed the pitch during the regular season, when he used it in 43 percent of those situations. Overall, he threw the slider on 15.7 percent of his pitches in Game 2, compared to 14.7 percent prior to that point.

Given how successful Scherzer's season was, and how effective he's been in his last two starts against Boston, it wouldn't be surprising if Scherzer was bluffing in his comments and he sticks with his tried-and-true game plan until the Sox force him to adapt by proving they've adjusted. Those hitters haven't had a lot of success against elite sliders throughout the year, so if Scherzer were to voluntarily alter his approach, it would actually play into Boston's batting-gloved hands.

2. Buchholz needs to control the situation.
As Eric Wilbur accurately pointed out Friday, fan confidence in Buchholz is probably at a season low after he surrendered eight hits and five runs over 5.2 innings in Game 2, and ran his ERA to 6.17 this postseason. And based on what John Farrell said Thursday, the Sox had better hope Buchholz isn't experiencing those same doubts about himself at the end of a season that was spoiled by three months on the disabled list.

When Buchholz is right, he has shined through his ability to make a pitch when it matters, to avoid bad mistakes, and to limit damage. Lately, though, he's made too many mistakes to sluggers and paid the price with home runs, and last Sunday he let the sixth inning blow up on him entirely.

His fading at the end of that start prompted questions about the right-hander's arm strength, though his manager indicated it had more to do with misplaced pitches and poor game management than anything else. The Tigers should have a sense of urgency Saturday night, so it'll be important that Buchholz do a better job in both of those regards, and not allow Detroit to turn a couple of baserunners into a rally.

"I don't think it's just a matter of fatigue," Farrell said. "Consistency to execution against these types of lineups is never more important.  And when you mislocate, you're going to pay the price.  And he has in that four‑run inning the other night, where in the matter of 11 pitches it was four runs on the board.

"Recognizing that the momentum, particularly the momentum inside an inning, is what's got to be kept under check a little bit more, and particularly in Clay's situation."

3. The Sox are better when Shane Victorino is a factor.
Unfortunately, at this point he's not. The right fielder is 2-for-21 in the series, without a walk, and he was particularly brutal in Game 5 -- when he went 0-for-5, struck out twice, returned to hitting left-handed, abandoned that idea partway through the contest, and came up with a chance to pad the Sox' lead in the ninth, but failed wildly at four straight pitches off the plate to eventually get himself out.

Farrell said they'd thought about bumping Victorino out of the No. 2 spot in the lineup, though as of Friday they hadn't yet made the decision to do so. If it doesn't happen in Game 6 it's a more distinct possibility if there's a Game 7. Although if Victorino can figure out a way to turn things around Saturday, he's impactful enough himself to see that that game never happens.

4. Will Alex Avila play?
Avila was having a really good series, looking more like the AL MVP candidate of 2011 than the .227 hitter of this season, before he was crunched by David Ross in a collision at home plate and twisted his knee. Jim Leyland said Friday that he wasn't sure about his catcher's availability for Game 6 -- but it could have a significant impact on the contest.

Avila had a homer and three RBI against Buchholz in Game 2, and is a .455 hitter against him lifetime, so his left-handed bat would be a substantial loss for the middle of the Tigers' lineup. Then in the bottom of the inning it could force Detroit to scramble defensively. Brayan Pena came in and played well Thursday, but Leyland admitted that he and his coaches would at least consider moving designated hitter Victor Martinez behind he plate if Avila can't go.

Martinez is a career catcher, but coming off knee reconstruction surgery he caught just three games this season (two in August, one in September). He's a veteran, and a pro, so he'd probably be okay. But it would still take the Tigers into a scenario they'd prefer not to have to go.

"That has been thought about, yes," Leyland said. "But I don't want to ‑‑ particularly this time of year with the significance of everything and then so much media, once you mention something like that, it's all over the wires that Martinez might catch.  That's not true.  I hope nobody starts writing that, because it's not true.  But it would be an option, let me put it that way.  It would be an option." 

5. Double plays.
The Red Sox pitching staff has been excellent, without question. But part of the reason they've done so well to limit runs and squelch Tiger rallies is their incredible knack for inducing double plays in this series.

Through five games the Sox have turned eight twin killings, including three in Game 5 alone. Some of that has to do with Detroit's plodding hitters, but a lot of it has to do with the execution of the Sox' infield defense, and if there's one number that quantifies why Stephen Drew remains John Farrell's choice at shortstop,that's probably it.
Junichi Tazawa prompted two double plays all season, then got a pair on Thursday night, including one while facing Miguel Cabrera with runners at the corners, nobody out, and the Sox clinging to a two-run lead. That was arguably the biggest play in the latter half of that game. And, conversely, Boston's inability to roll a pair punished them in Game 4, when Dustin Pedroia booted an opportunity to start the sequence, and Detroit turned that opening into a game-turning rally.

Can the Sox continue to count on bailing themselves out, two outs at a time? That could be a critical question.

6. Does Prince Fielder wake up?
The Tiger first baseman has been a nonfactor in the series, going 4-for-19 with one extra-base hit, a .286 OBP, and a .549 OPS. Leyland stuck by his first baseman Friday, saying "he's had some good at‑bats.  He's had some quick at‑bats, as well, where he puts the ball in play and hasn't quite centered it where he wants to.  He's just trying to hit the ball hard.  When he gets it hard and in the air obviously you do some damage with it.  But he just hasn't been able to do that a lot yet, although he's hit some balls pretty good."

With Martinez swinging the bat well, and Johnny Peralta posing a threat behind him, the Tiger manager has to be thinking about whether he might be better off dropping Fielder in the order, and giving Cabrera some better protection.

That might seem rash treatment of a $24 million star, but Sox fans should remember what happened with Jason Giambi back in 2003. Through six games of that ALCS, the Yankee was 4-for-21 with one RBI. For Game 7, Joe Torre dropped Giambi from third to seventh in the New York lineup -- and Giambi's two homers kept the game close enough for Grady Little to ultimately give it away..

Keep that in mind if Leyland's lineup creates a reason to compare the situations.

A suggested Sox lineup for Game 5

Posted by David D'Onofrio October 17, 2013 11:00 AM

There's a fine line between allegiance and alarm when it comes to assembling a lineup. A manager must be careful not to overreact amid the ebbs and flows inherent to baseball's natural rhythm, but he can't be so blindly loyal that he's stubborn, either. It's a tricky balance.

Of course, there's an even finer line between winning and losing when it comes to the playoffs -- which is part of the reason why Jim Leyland decided he couldn't wait another day before tweaking his batting order. Austin Jackson was the Tigers' leadoff hitter in 102 of the team's previous 106 games, but he batted eighth in Game 4 of the American League Championship Series. Torii Hunter moved to the top of the lineup for the first time since 1999. And Miguel Cabrera moved up the No. 2 slot for the first time in nine years, after exclusively batting third since 2011.

The decisions paid off for Detroit, as those three players combined to drive in six of the seven runs that accounted for a 7-3 win.

And with the ALCS now knotted at two games apiece, it appears time for the Red Sox to respond.

Boston doubled its hit total for the series on Wednesday (going from 12 to 24), but the 10 men stranded on base were left behind as signals that there are still too many holes in the order, too many players scuffling -- and so before it's too late, John Farrell needs to consider making some changes. Then he needs to make them.

Whether or not he'll act remains to be seen. "One thing that we've maintained is a constant approach with the lineup and not creating further uncertainty, and I think our guys have responded well to that," he said after Wednesday's loss, which he left lamenting the lack of two-out knocks and timely extra-base hits, but largely satisfied with his team's offensive approach.

But at this juncture there's no time to wait for guys to bust out of their funk, or to hope things starts coming together the way they did during the regular season, when the Sox had the most productive bats in baseball. Boston's season is down to a best-of-three for the American League pennant. They're not desperate yet, but there is undeniable urgency ingrained in every decision at this point.

And the Sox' Game 5 lineup should reflect that. It should be bold. It should be designed with only Thursday in mind. It should look something like this:

1. Jacoby Ellsbury, CF
After a 4-for-5 night in Game 4, his average in this series is up to .333, with a .412 on-base percentage, and so there's no question he should remain in the leadoff spot. He's been the Sox' best offensive player in the postseason -- at .424 overall -- and if Wednesday is a precursor of a hot streak, he could be the catalyst that gets the offensive engine firing again.


2. Daniel Nava, LF
He has a hit in each of his starts in this series, reaching base in three of seven plate appearances. In Game 1 he coaxed 22 pitches out of his four trips, so in Game 4 the Tigers attacked him with strikes -- they were seven for seven -- and forced him to swing the bat, though Nava still managed to register a single in one at-bat, and get a runner to third base with a grounder to the right side in another. He's one of the few Sox that seems to be executing his plan at this point, and he can handle whatever the situation requires out of the No. 2 hitter. Plus, if the Tigers go to a lefty in order to turn around the switch hitter, the Sox can easily sub in Jonny Gomes.

3. David Ortiz, DH
His lone hit in the series was the game-tying grand slam in Game 2 -- and even then he admitted he felt funny at the plate that night. But he's 3-for-6 against Detroit starter Anibal Sanchez in his career, with a double and two homers. Even when he's struggling, the Sox want him at the plate as often as possible.


4. Dustin Pedroia, 2B
The second baseman has more strikeouts (eight) than hits (seven) this postseason, and his average is down to .214 in this series against the Tigers. Other than the latter half of Game 2, he's looked uncomfortable at the plate, swinging at a lot of bad balls and hitting a lot of harmless ground balls. Maybe moving him down a spot allows him to relax a bit, and hitting in front of a heating Napoli might also give him some better pitches to hit.

5. Mike Napoli, 1B
He followed up his game-winning homer by going 2-for-4 with a double. He went 0-for-2 with a walk against Sanchez in the series opener, though all three plate appearances were of good quality. When he was going well he carried the Sox at times this season, and he did the same thing with the Rangers a couple of postseasons ago, when Rays' manager Joe Maddon declared it the "Year of Napoli." He fits in the middle of the order, and the case could even be made he deserves to be in the cleanup spot of this order.

6. Jarrod Saltalamacchia, C
It's tempting to go with David Ross behind the plate after he and Jon Lester worked so well together against Tampa, but there are several reasons why Saltalamacchia is the better option: he was 2-for-4 in Game 3, and offense is at a premium right now; Ross is 2-for-12 against Sanchez lifetime; if Ross plays, the Sox will have five righties in the lineup against Sanchez (who held righties to a .207 average this season), possibly six if Farrell goes with Gomes over Nava, and possibly seven if he also goes with Bogaerts/Middlebrooks over Stephen Drew; Saltalamacchia is better when swinging from the left side; Saltalamacchia and Lester worked together just fine in Game 1 against Tampa Bay. Oh, and he hits here to avoid giving Leyland the chance to use one reliever for four straight righties later on.

7. Xander Bogaerts, 3B
Farrell was asked directly after Wednesday's game if he would consider giving Bogaerts his first postseason start. He said he would. And the manager should quickly see that it's the right move. Will Middlebrooks is 1-for-10 with five strikeouts in the series, while Bogaerts doubled Wednesday, and has proven in each of his at-bats during these playoffs that the stage isn't too big for him. He belongs. And he belongs on the field.

8. Shane Victorino, RF
It looks as though the Tigers have developed an effective plan for attacking Victorino from the right side of the plate, and thus he's 2-for-16 in the series, with no walks and seven strikeouts. He's broken his bat more often than he's made good contact, and it should be his defense -- more than his playoff experience or his everyday status -- that keeps him somewhere in the lineup.


9. Stephen Drew, SS
If Bogaerts is in the lineup, it's either Drew or Middlebrooks who sits. Drew is a mess at the plate right now, as 1-for-13 and a .220 OPS both scream. But Middlebrooks has not been better enough than Drew to mitigate the value Drew brings defensively at shortstop. He's so far been a part of five double plays, he made a dazzling catch in medium center field that in many ways gave the Sox a chance in Game 1, and -- even with an error on his ledger -- he's steady. Lester got 10 ground balls out of the Tigers in Game 1. Farrell would be more comfortable with Drew at an important position on the infield.

About the author

Dave D'Onofrio is a sports journalist who focuses on the Red Sox and Patriots, and also writes Boston.com's "Off The Field" blog about what Boston's sportsmen do away from the More »

More community voices

Child in Mind

Corner Kicks

Dirty Old Boston

Mortal Matters

On Deck

TEDx Beacon Street

archives

Browse this blog

by category