RadioBDC Logo
Forever | HAIM Listen Live
 
 
< Back to front page Text size +

Poll: What do you think of Boston's Institute of Contemporary Art?

Posted by Rob Anderson  March 8, 2011 02:02 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

icaex.JPGHow is Boston’s Institute of Contemporary Art doing four years after moving to its new home on the South Boston waterfront? Well, it depends on whom you ask.

Boston magazine editor Rachel Levitt Slade, for example, isn't that impressed. In an article published last month, Slade criticized the ICA for exhibiting a “disappointing string of shallow, blingtastic displays”:

Rather than create shows with the power to lure provocative art-world heavies to our brainy city, the museum has become a kind of Rue La La of contemporary art: It peddles brand names we could find almost anywhere. … And whether we blame the business-minded board; the curators who have gone after attention-grabbing but lightweight shows; or Boston’s inclination to settle for safe art, the result is painfully clear: The ICA has not done nearly enough to push new concepts onto our intellectual map.

On the other hand, Globe art critic Sebastian Smee writes it'd be "crazy to say [the ICA] hasn't been a success." He took his argument to Slade herself in a debate on WBUR's Radio Boston. You can listen to that debate below:



In his blog post and on air, Smee challenges Slade's assertion that the ICA has only delivered lightweight shows, pointing to exhibits of the works of Anish Kapoor, Tara Donovan, Charles LeDray and Mark Bradford as counterexamples. (Don't worry if you haven't heard of these artists, although that may prove Smee's point — if these artists don't have a following in Boston, isn't good that a museum is bringing their works to the city?)

The Globe's editorial board jumped into the fray over the weekend, aruging, like Smee, that Slade's attacks were unjustified:

The museum has struck an impressive balance between featuring up-and-coming artists and mid-career retrospectives. And by earning positive nods from curators and publications around the world, the museum is growing into its role of ambassador for the city’s art scene.

Have you been to the new ICA? What did you think? Leave you thoughts in the comment section and vote in the poll below.

Globe file photo: An exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art last February.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

ABOUT THE ANGLE Online commentary and news analysis from the Boston Globe. The Angle is produced by Rob Anderson and Alan Wirzbicki. You can follow Rob on Twitter at @rcand.

Editors' Picks

Tickets for T seat hogs?Tickets for T seat hogs?
Why the MBTA should punish riders who needlessly claim more than one seat.
T-shirts and democracyT-shirts and democracy
What souvenir sales teach us about reform in Myanmar
Lessons from Kony 2012Lessons from Kony 2012
Why Invisible Children films are the new textbook of civic engagement.
The Angle's comments policy
archives