Organic movement, genetic engineering do not mix
PAMELA RONALD'S article "The new organic" (Ideas, March 16) argues that the organic agriculture movement should embrace genetic engineering as another tool in our collective pursuit to feed a growing world population. But Ronald's optimism in the unquestioned virtues of genetic engineering will not likely find a following within the organic movement. She fails to acknowledge one of the organic movement's key principles: reverence for the productive complexity of the natural world. Genetic engineers, on the other hand, aim to find solutions to problems through practices that are highly experimental and have myriad unintended consequences.
Nature is complex and unpredictable, and while we cannot predict the specific consequences of genetic engineering, we can confidently predict that effects will ripple in unanticipated ways. For example, we are already seeing insects evolving in such a way that gives them resistance to genetically engineered crops with built-in pesticides. Organic farming incorporates good stewardship methods, working with natural processes and allowing for complexity and natural balance. Genetic engineering cannot be reconciled with these key values.
CHARLOTTE VALLAEYS
Food and farm policy analyst
The Cornucopia Institute
Cornucopia, Wis. 