(Shannon Stapleton/REUTERS)
PERHAPS HILLARY Clinton's Pennsylvania win kept "her hopes alive" (Page A1, April 23), but it's hard to see why. Do the math: Barack Obama is about 125 delegates ahead. There are 408 delegates left to be chosen by elections. All indications are that they will split nearly evenly. That leaves about 300 superdelegates who have not endorsed either candidate. Clinton needs more than 70 percent of these superdelegates to vote for her. Why should such a thing happen? She's only got 52 percent of the superdelegates who have endorsed so far. Even if the Michigan and Florida delegates were seated, Obama would still be ahead.
Sure, let's have the rest of the votes, so the late-voting states can be a part of the process for once. But let's not pretend that Clinton has any realistic chance.
KEN OLUM
Sharon
SARAH JANE VAUGHANWatertown
Clinton now appears to be a more viable candidate than Barack Obama, not because of the superdelegates, but because of her ability to be able to capture the big states, such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, California, and New York, which are critical in order for the Democrats to win the presidency.
KENNETH L. ZIMMERMAN
Huntington Beach, Calif.
BARBARA KARLIN
Chestnut Hill![]()


