THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Ample evidence of pesticide ills

November 20, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

CONTRARY TO Judy Foreman's "Comparing apples to organic apples" (Health/Science, Nov. 10), which questions the relative benefits of organic as opposed to conventionally grown foods, there is a massive body of "hard-nosed" scientific evidence linking pesticide residues to a variety of illnesses, including cancer, birth defects, autism and other neurological problems, and infertility.

As we document in our book "Poisoned Profits: The Toxic Assault on Our Children," the young are especially vulnerable to these poisons because they have not built up their defenses. A 1993 report by the National Academy of Sciences, "Pesticides in the Diets of Children," described the dangers in detail and led to the passage of legislation requiring an extra margin of safety to protect kids from food contaminated by these poisons.

While the cost of buying organic foods may be higher than conventional foods, the costs of dealing with the illness caused by organophosphate pesticides can be prohibitive.

Interestingly, on the same day Foreman's article appeared in the Globe, the European Parliament's environment committee issued a report calling for a reduction in the use of "dangerous pesticides" on foods in order to protect human health.

Philip and Alice Shabecoff
Brookline

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.