THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Why shrink from notion of putting our names in lights?

July 7, 2010

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

COLUMNIST STEVEN Syre pokes fun at a Cambridge proposal to allow businesses to put prominent signs on their buildings (“Behold vanity’s glare?’’ Business, July 2).

What would the Prudential Building be without the word “Prudential’’ on top? Didn’t Bostonians seek to make the Citgo sign a landmark?

The fact is, we need the signs. Boston Consulting Group says Kendall Square in Cambridge is the densest hub of innovation in the world — four times more than Palo Alto, Calif. Yet, while a drive down US Highway 101 past Palo Alto tells the story of a global capital of technology, a drive through Kendall Square says nothing. We need to do a better job presenting ourselves as a place to build global businesses.

Susan Hockfield, president of MIT, said recently that we need to turn our buildings inside out. After Google finally got a tiny street-level sign, the Globe’s Scott Kirsner poked fun a different way in a March column: “Why did it have to be a secret that this unassuming brick office building is home to the Cambridge offices of Google, a search engine you might have heard of?’’

In true Puritan style, we hide our best assets. Does this make sense?

Timothy Rowe
CEO
Cambridge Innovation Center
Cambridge

More opinions

Find the latest columns from: