< Back to Front Page Text size +

Harvard's *new* Summers brouhaha

Posted by Christopher Shea July 24, 2008 09:44 AM

For seven years, John H. Summers taught students in Harvard's Social Studies program -- simultaneously getting a crash course in elite students' sense of entitlement, he says.

Now ensconced at Boston College as a visiting scholar, he's given vent to his ire in the (English) Times Higher Education Supplement, in a piece titled "All the privileged must have prizes." He would routinely ask his students what they valued in their teachers. "Invariably," he wrote, "they said good teachers made them 'feel comfortable.'"

HarvardYard400x315.jpg
Yeah, this place again

Nothing was permitted to disturb the cocoon-view that the students would move frictionlessly into the ruling class, unless stroking counts as friction. The "corruption" of grade inflation was part of this cosseting environment; no teacher dare give less than a B without risking "petty harassment." "I do not mean merely that the students are never so aggressive and articulate as when they hunt for grades," Summers, who had a series of one-year appointments, wrote. "I mean that they wage political reprisals against the B-minus grader and send gifts to high-placed academic directors." (Stephen Bradt, a Harvard spokesman, said he could not respond to the allegation about gifts unless Summers provided more specifics. In an email exchange, Summers said he wanted to stress that his charge was aimed at students, not administrators. If any gifts were received, as he says he had heard, he believes they were returned -- and that the staff of the Committee on Degrees in Social Studies were not swayed by them: "I have every reason to believe in the perfect integrity of the director of studies and of my colleagues." Anya Bernstein, the director of studies in the social-studies program, was on vacation and couldn't be immediately reached.)

Summers was forced, he says, to change one course title from "Anarchist cultural criticism in America" to the more anodyne "America and its critics." "Here was the same method of cultural hygiene that has transformed Harvard Square from a bohemian enclave into an outdoor mall."

For his prototypical Harvard student, Summers cited Jared Kushner, scion of a real-estate magnate, who was already making his own property deals while in college, and whom Summers taught: "Jared later purchased The New York Observer for $10 million … As publisher, one of his first moves was to reduce pay for the Observer's stable of book reviewers. I had been writing reviews for the Observer in an effort to pay my debts."

A perfect synechdoche! "[T]he sedulous banality of the rich," Summers concluded, "degrades teaching into a service-class preoccupation whose chief duty is preparing clients for monied careers."

However, Bob Sommer, president of the Observer Media Group, said that the Observer's budget and space allocation for books coverage have, in fact, increased during the Kushner regime, contrary to industrywide trends -- and that payments per review had not changed, either. Of John Summers, he added: "There was a deliberate editorial decision not to keep him on as a reviewer."

See the comments below the Summers piece for a lively debate among people with various connections to Harvard.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
8 comments so far...
  1. One can share Summer's cynicism without even fully reading his piece. I do not say lightly that I SURVIVED four years at an elitist institution as a social outcast, and punk among princes. My classmates called my incredibly rare gift of an academic scholarship absurd. I spent four years withdrawing as much knowledge, and experience as I could from both the institution and the world around it. Most of my classmates spent more time withdrawing cash from a bottomless ATM account. Professors should be able to teach, and more importantly be free to outright challenge a student to THINK, feel, and respond with intelligence. Academic legacies should not be a free ride through four years of education and a degree.

    Posted by Joseph Ohio July 24, 08 02:28 PM
  1. That Summers-Kushner-NYObserver bit is priceless. And I agree with Summers's assessment of the degradation of teaching. So long as trustees and university presidents are forced into grubbing for funds from the rich, the plight of U.S. higher education will get worse before it gets better. We don't want to risk annoying and bothering the white-gloved hands that feed us! - TL

    Posted by Tim Lacy July 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. What's ironic is that Harvard doesn't need to grub for money, at least not from its students. It's long past the point where its endowment is self-sustaining; Harvard could give every single undergraduate a free ride, financially. Instead, it offers a free ride, intellectually, by fostering an atmosphere of "achievement" for thin academic accomplishment.

    College is supposed to be more than, and better than, high-school. That's what set American higher education apart from much of the world-- a focus on thought, debate and development over academic bedpost notching, waiting for the next and better thing. Harvard has allowed itself to become yet less than the average high-school, where at least the possibility of flunking out exists.

    Posted by Wiss August 5, 08 10:13 PM
  1. among the thousands o harvard graduates, why did only two find this matter worthy of reply? pstp

    Posted by Paul St.Pierre August 5, 08 10:37 PM
  1. Paul:
    If you go to the Higher Education Supplement piece I link to, you'll find all sorts of Harvard grads and undergrads weighing in.

    Posted by Chris Shea August 6, 08 10:41 AM
  1. Interesting piece, interesting comments. There is nothing quite like a squabble in the academic world. All good fun for a reader in Europe where our university administrators gently chide their graduates for not being more like American students and their good folks who leave so much of their money to Harvard and Yale. But however much they chide, it seems to have little effect.
    J. P. Ward

    Posted by j.p. ward August 6, 08 12:11 PM
  1. "Professors should be able to teach, and more importantly be free to outright challenge a student to THINK, feel, and respond with intelligence. "
    Joseph if they do this they will quite simply annoy their paymasters or at least significant numbers of them, and the serfs of these masters-the administration will soon find a away to terminate such effrontery.
    Ask any Adjunct-but in private.

    Posted by Brian McCosh August 8, 08 03:44 AM
  1. I think all of the criticism aimed at Summers - and the nature of it - serves only to prove his point.

    Posted by Rob Anderson August 8, 08 09:03 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About brainiac What's happening in the world of ideas.
contributors
Christopher Shea covers intellectual affairs and is the former "Critical Faculties" columnist for the Ideas section.
archives

browse this blog

by category