< Back to Front Page
Text size
–
+
Of soda, pop, and "coke"
An awesome map: "Generic Names for Soft Drinks by County."
Why, I wonder, is Boston a partial holdout from the near-universal New England preference for "soda"? Simple demographic diversity?
(I don't get the "coke" thing at all.)
(Via Matthew Yglesias)



The generic use of "coke" in the South (especially the Southeast) is a regional artifact caused by the dominance of Coca-Cola, based in Atlanta. So it's like Xerox, Dumpster, etc., identification of a dominant brand with the whole marketplace.
I wonder if Boston's lower score on the use of "soda" is not due to our diverse population but rather to the holdouts who still say "tonic." Being a native of the area, I grew up with "tonic" and thought I was switching to the American norm when I began saying "soda" instead. But according to the map, I was still being parochial. "Pop" is unthinkable to me, but it seems the most pop-ular nationwide.
In regard to the Boston question: maybe because of that great underdog, "tonic"? Without over thinking it, I'm pretty sure I and my (Boston-bred, South Shore-living) relatives use that term fairly often. I think...
I've frequently heard soda called "soder" in Italian American neighborhoods (where I'm from) in New England. Where does that come from?
We called them "soft drinks" where I grew up in the south, in a county that shows very strong for "Coke" in that map. Or as we pronounced it, "soft drank". Strange. I couldn't believe my ears when I went to New York for college and heard the term "soda"--to me that was what you called "soda water." "Tonic" is a charming local term that I almost never hear anymore in the Boston area.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
browse this blog
by categoryrelated links
INside Boston.com