< Back to front page Text size +

Ethicists who don't call their mothers

Posted by Christopher Shea  September 14, 2010 04:44 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Are professional ethicists any more likely to keep in touch with their mothers than non-ethicist philosophers--or than non-philosophers, for that matter? Not according to a survey conducted by Eric Schwitzgebel, of the University of California at Riverside, and Josh Rust, of Crafton Hills College Stetson University, who posted their results on the blog Experimental Philosophy.

All three groups agreed that it was morally wrong for an adult to fail to touch base with his or her mother, face-to-face or by telephone, at least once a month. Seventy-three percent of ethicists believed this, as did 74 percent of non-ethicist philosophers, and 71 percent of non-philosophers. The differences in responses were not statistically significant.

The two scholars followed up the question about abstract ethics with one about behavior: How often did the respondents call their mothers? There were four possible responses, with the least engaged answer being "once (or less) every 2-3 months" (well short of the once-a-month standard). Eleven percent of ethicists fell into that category, as compared with 12 percent of non-ethicists philosophers--and, strikingly, a mere 5 percent of non-philosophers.

While that difference in behavior was was not robust--after subjecting it to further analysis, the authors called it "statistically marginal"--but Schwitzgebel and Rust wrote that even the weak version of their conclusion should give readers pause: Pondering moral issues professionally does not lead you to be any more likely to pick up the phone and call Mom, despite a societal consensus that that's the right thing to do.

This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

 
About brainiac Brainiac is the daily blog of the Globe's Sunday Ideas section, covering news and delights from the worlds of art, science, literature, history, design, and more. You can follow us on Twitter @GlobeIdeas.
contributors
Brainiac blogger Kevin Hartnett is a writer in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached here.

Leon Neyfakh is the staff writer for Ideas. Amanda Katz is the deputy Ideas editor. Stephen Heuser is the Ideas editor.

Guest blogger Simon Waxman is Managing Editor of Boston Review and has written for WBUR, Alternet, McSweeney's, Jacobin, and others.

Guest blogger Elizabeth Manus is a writer living in New York City. She has been a book review editor at the Boston Phoenix, and a columnist for The New York Observer and Metro.

Guest blogger Sarah Laskow is a freelance writer and editor in New York City. She edits Smithsonian's SmartNews blog and has contributed to Salon, Good, The American Prospect, Bloomberg News, and other publications.

Guest blogger Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, publisher, and freelance semiotician. He was the original Brainiac blogger, and is currently editor of the blog HiLobrow, publisher of a series of Radium Age science fiction novels, and co-author/co-editor of several books, including the story collection "Significant Objects" and the kids' field guide to life "Unbored."

Guest blogger Ruth Graham is a freelance journalist in New Hampshire, and a frequent Ideas contributor. She is a former features editor for the New York Sun, and has written for publications including Slate and the Wall Street Journal.

Joshua Rothman is a graduate student and Teaching Fellow in the Harvard English department, and an Instructor in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. He teaches novels and political writing.

archives

Browse this blog

by category