<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Brainiac</title>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:48:31 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=1.53</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Click-bait headline of the week</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sphere.com/2009/11/06/woman-reveals-health-horror-my-vagina-fell-out/?icid=main|main|dl1|link7|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sphere.com%2F2009%2F11%2F06%2Fwoman-reveals-health-horror-my-vagina-fell-out%2F">Your <em>what</em> did <em>what</em>?</a>

Yes, that would qualify as a "health horror."

Via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/08/my-vagina-fell-out-woman-_n_349803.html">HuffPost</a>]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/clickbait_headl.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/clickbait_headl.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Synth Britannia (the music, anyway) hits Boston</title>
<description><![CDATA[Rik Eberhardt posted this comment under <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/jg_ballard.html">my recent item</a> on the British documentary "Synth Britannia," but it seems worthy of more publicity. (WMBR is the MIT radio station, available at 88.1 FM or, in streamed form, via the web address below.) Sounds like a superb show, including more discussion of the link between J.G. Ballard and synth-pop.

<blockquote>I still haven't had a chance to view the full doc yet, but I'll be playing bands featured in it on my radio show tonight on WMBR: Last Dance at the Death Disco. John Foxx, Ultravox, and Gary Numan, and The Normal of course, but also bands that were also influenced by the writer, but might not have been in the doc (again -- haven't seen it yet): Human League, Heaven 17, Cabaret Voltaire, The Associates, Comsat Angels and many more. 

Check out the website and listen to the live stream tonight at 10PM: 
<a href="http://deathdisco.fm">http://deathdisco.fm</a>
<a href="http://wmbr.org">http://wmbr.org</a> ]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/synth_britannia.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/synth_britannia.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:17:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Step away from the mirror, technophiles</title>
<description><![CDATA[Remember all those bloggers whose hands were clearly trembling with excitement as they typed posts heralding the extraordinary role Twitter was playing in the Iranian protests last summer? 

As Valleywag <a href="http://gawker.com/5400268/the-revolution-will-not-be-tweeted-because-only-0027-of-iranians-are-on-twitter">reports</a> today, a British writer and analyst, Charles Leadbeater, and a co-author and researcher, Annika Wong, decided to find out exactly how large that role was. The pair made use of data provided by a "media analytics" company called Sysomos. Leadbeater and Wong's conclusion? Twitter's role was negligible. It <i>had</i> to be negligible, in fact, given that a mere <em>.027 percent</em> of Iranians have registered to use the social-networking service.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/step_away_from.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/step_away_from.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:55:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Look who&apos;s got juice at the Times Book Review!</title>
<description><![CDATA[Every writer whose book is negatively reviewed would relish the chance to rebut the reviewer, in the very same publication, at the same length as the original review. But editors generally think that such letters are a waste of space. The complaining pieces, when they appear, are whittled down, the excess sour-grapes verbiage relegated to the author's therapy session.  

But not if you're Mark Danner! For some reason, the editors of the New York Times Book Review last week granted an extraordinary favor to Danner, allowing him a full 1,255 words to argue with George Packer, a writer for the New Yorker whose Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/books/review/Packer-t.html?sq=&st=cse&%2334;=&scp=2&%2334;mark%20danner=&pagewanted=all">review</a> of Danner's "Stripping Bare the Body: Politics Violence War" was respectful of Danner but highly critical of the book.

For context, that's 81 words longer than James Parker's <em>cover review</em> this week of the latest Stephen King novel. Danner's letter is fully four-fifth's the length of Packer's original review.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/look_whos_got_j.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/look_whos_got_j.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:19:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>J.G. Ballard and &quot;Synth Britannia&quot;</title>
<description>Would PBS ever greenlight something as interesting and non-Ken-Burns-y as &quot;Synth Britannia,&quot; to which BBC viewers were recently treated? The documentary is described on the BBC website as site as &quot;following a generation of post-punk musicians who took the synthesiser from the experimental fringes to the centre of the pop stage.&quot;

Were Pete Townsend and Brian Eno, who predate the musicians profiled, really &quot;the experimental fringes&quot;? In any case, the BBC says that the Beatles-on-Ed-Sullivan moment for synthesizer-driven music came in 1979, when Gary Numan appeared on the British show Top of the Pops.

Numan&apos;s best-known song in the United States is &quot;Cars,&quot; which brings us to one of the themes of the documentary: the link between synth-pop and the work of the English writer J.G. Ballard, known for his dystopian ruminations on modern life, most famously in the novel &quot;Crash.&quot;</description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/jg_ballard.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/jg_ballard.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:07:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on Harvard&apos;s &quot;New Literary History of America&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory, and Priscilla Wald, a professor of English and womens' studies at Duke, <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/Is-This-Literary-History-/48956/">debate</a> the new Harvard University Press reference work:

After warming up, Bauerlein comes to his main point:

<blockquote>The old Master Narratives and Concepts have no place either--American Adam, Symbolism, and American Literature, etc.--except for one. It resounds in the beginning, where the editors explain why entries proliferate after the Civil War: They note that "the story of the United States becomes a story of previously disenfranchised, despised, degraded, excluded, enslaved, brutalized, and even unspeakable Americans claiming their place as full citizens, demanding not only the right to speak but the right to be heard, remaking the country as surely as any before them, and, in novels, poems, paintings, speeches, and acts, judging it as it had never been judged before."

That angle, emotional and partisan as it is, calls for judgment. It seems to me a loaded approach, overemphasizing the victims, conceived in resentment, aggrandizing one kind of American experience and excluding others from the story. With two-thirds of the volume following the disenfranchised-franchised pattern, this isn't a literary history of America. It's a drama of multiculturalist emergence.</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/more_on_harvard.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/more_on_harvard.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:08:18 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Literary overstatement of the week</title>
<description><![CDATA[Ben Yagoda has a new book out, with the nice title "Memoir: A History." Covering it, the Philadelphia Inquirer <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/magazine/20091103_Celebrating_the_memoir_-_fiction_s_day_is_done_.html">states</a>:

<blockquote>The emphasis on memoir is so strong that autobiography, history and fiction may be endangered. And the reasons for memoir's popularity may rest in our very nature as Americans: In a land where the majority rules, individuality is exalted and memoir is more befitting the American ideal of resourcefulness.

"When it comes to proving points and making cases, fiction's day is done," Yagoda says.</blockquote>

I can't decide whether Yagoda or his profiler is the more egregious hyperbolist, but Yagoda has the excuse of flogging a book.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/literary_overst.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/literary_overst.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:21:01 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The sacrifice of the castrati</title>
<description><![CDATA[On her new album, "Sacrificium," the opera star Cecilia Bartoli sings music originally written for castrati, men who (to put the point gently) had been surgically altered as boy, so that their voices would never break. They sang in high registers associated today with women but had the powerful bodies and lung capacities of male singers, enabling distinct, and apparently sublime, artistic effects.

In interviews and on <a href="http://www.ceciliabartolionline.com/cms/sacrificium.html">her web site</a>, Bartoli has stressed the grim and tragic aspects of the castrati phenomenon. Some classical critics have challenged her claim that, during the Baroque period, Italy alone was castrating 3,000 to 4,000 boys a year for artistic purposes, but, regardless of the figure, many were mutilated and only a few became superstars. And being a castrated superstar was surely not a psychologically unfraught experience, either.

The photographs of Bartoli commissioned to accompany "Sacrificium" are as striking as the music on the CD.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/the_sacrifice_o.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/the_sacrifice_o.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:27:17 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sontag on Claude Levi-Strauss</title>
<description><![CDATA[Claude L&eacute;vi-Strauss, who died on Oct. 30, age 100, was an extraordinarily influential figure in France by the early 1960s, but "hardly known in this country," according to a young Susan Sontag. Sontag, therefore, took it upon herself to hail him in <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/13602">a 1963 essay</a>, published in the New York Review of Books, that helped to broaden his reputation. It later appeared, in expanded form, as "The Anthropologist as Hero," in her collection "Against Interpretation."

L&eacute;vi-Strauss, Sontag wrote, was prototypically modern in that he had responded to the alienating aspects of contemporary life--its accelerating speed, its homogeneity--by immersing himself its opposite: the exotic, the hyperlocal, the "primitive."  ]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/claude_levistra.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/claude_levistra.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:43:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoes of the glory days</title>
<description><![CDATA[On Friday, there was a fistfight in the Style section of the Washington Post. An older editor, Henry Allen, a literary lion/New Journalist in his day, called <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103003593_pf.html">a piece that two younger colleagues had just turned in</a> the second-worst piece of dreck he'd read in four-plus decades at the newspaper. One of the recipients of this insult, a young feature writer, took umbrage and his rebuttal included a vulgarity. Allen counter-rebutted with his fists. The paper's top editor, Marcus Brauchli, was among those who broke up the quite serious scrum.

Today, Gene Weingarten, the Post's humor columnist, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/10/01/DI2009100102668.html#1103">weighs in, writing: "Hooray."</a> In these days of fiscal worry and editorial overcautiousness, he writes, he's glad that some writers and editors, at least, still have passion for their work, and high standards.

Which brings us to that question lingering in the air: what was the <em>worst</em> story  Allen ever read? ]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/echoes_of_the_g.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/echoes_of_the_g.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Breaking news from the Weekly Standard: Bob Dylan&apos;s a fraud</title>
<description><![CDATA[Haven't heard the much-discussed Christmas album, but I think that Bob Dylan's previous two albums were overpraised. Sure, he and the band did a fine job of summoning up all sorts of rootsy, bluesy sounds and song forms, but there's not enough Dylan there, or the Dylan I like. In 1997's "Time Out of Mind," in contrast, the songwriter makes use of the olde-timey material rather than being mastered by it.

My thoughts, unfortunately, do not comport with Andrew Ferguson's witty <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/017/144saagx.asp">"Dylan roots theory,"</a> which he calls "famous, to me at least":

<blockquote>Whenever Dylan did something artistically egregious, in poor taste, inept, schlocky, or otherwise incompatible with his reputation for genius, the reviewers would explain that he was a kind of musicologist, plumbing the roots of Americana, absorbing within himself the variegated traditions of our native music and transmuting them into art uniquely his own.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/havent_heard_th.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/havent_heard_th.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:57:37 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Louis Menand on the perversities of academia</title>
<description><![CDATA[For a tidy summary of the rough straits that higher education finds itself in -- or, at least, that Ph.D. candidates in the humanities find themselves in; college presidents <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2009/11/02/with_college_costs_increasing_presidents_compensation_rises/">seem to be doing okay</a>--you could do worse than read Louis Menand's <a href="http://harvardmagazine.com/2009/11/professionalization-in-academy">piece</a> in the latest issue of Harvard Magazine. It's adapted from his forthcoming book, "The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University" (Norton).

Menand notes that the post-war growth in Ph.D. programs created, by 1975, an oversupply of humanities professors. Yet the problems are worse, or at least weirder, than a mere mismatch of supply and demand would suggest.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/louis_menand_on.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/louis_menand_on.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:06:48 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colson Whitehead on &quot;realist&quot; fiction</title>
<description><![CDATA[Colson Whitehead <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/books/review/Whitehead-t.html?_r=1&ref=books">runs through some genre possibilities</a> for his next book, with a capsule summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative: magical realism, the thriller, the book that "holds a mirror up to our society," and so on. Some of these entries just might get other writers <a href="http://maudnewton.com/blog/?p=2638">spitting mad</a>:
]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/colson_whitehea.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/11/colson_whitehea.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:48:33 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Print publications and customer service</title>
<description><![CDATA[I present three incidents totally unrelated to the current business woes of print publications:

1. I renew my longstanding subscription to the New Republic. Two months after the subscription lapses and the check has been cashed, I'm still magazineless. I call customer service and am informed that I should expect a 10 week lag between the processing of a check and the start of a subscription. A 10-week lag. I'm trying to imagine the system that could result in such a delay. (I may be dealing with one of those shady intermediary companies, but still. Why do <em>those</em> still exist?)  ...]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/10/print_publicati.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/10/print_publicati.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:02:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nukes you can use</title>
<description><![CDATA[Remember the days when the concept of limited nuclear war was out of favor? As one noted military strategist (Kennan?) put it: "Like Judas of old / You lie and deceive / A world war can be won / You want me to believe."

Escalation would be inevitable, went the argument, so it was better to think in terms of deterrence and mutually assured destruction, aka M.A.D.

In the November/December 2009 issue of Foreign Affairs, however, Keir A. Lieber, of Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, and Daryl G. Press, a professor of government at Dartmouth, <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65481/keir-a-lieber-and-daryl-g-press/the-nukes-we-need">make the case for retaining and maintaining small-yield nuclear weapons</a> that could be deployed in scenarios falling well short of Armageddon. If Iran, for example, used nuclear weapons to destroy a U.S. carrier fleet or other essentially military target (an Army base far from civilian centers, say), and the U.S. had in its arsenal only high-yield bombs, the two scholars write, it would find its hands tied. The world would see the destruction of Tehran as a disproportionate response. And a president might, not unreasonably, be unwilling to sanction the wholesale slaughter of civilians.

Small-to-medium-size atomic weapons that could take out foreign militaries and weapons systems while keeping civilian slaughter to a minimum (or "minimum") are therefore essential to a credible defense, Lieber and Press argue.]]></description>
<link>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/10/nukes_you_can_u.html</link>
<guid>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/10/nukes_you_can_u.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:58:08 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>