< Back to front page Text size +

'Bloody' still banned in Britain

Posted by Jan Freeman November 30, 2008 07:15 PM
Bloody%20ad.jpg

While our media have to deploy the f-word to attract official attention, in England all it takes to offend is bloody -- even though nobody has ever connected the word conclusively to anything offensive.

Last week, the Guardian reported that

A cheeky ad by the Sun gloating about Britain winning more medals than Australia at the Beijing Olympics, using a twist on Australia "Where the bloody hell are you?" tourism, has been banned by the advertising regulator.
The ad featured as a giant billboard on a truck comparing Britain's 19 Beijing gold medals alongside Australia's 14 with the strapline "Where the bloody hell were you?"

Rupert Murdoch's News Group argued that the ad was a "light-hearted, tongue-in-cheek, and gentle ribbing" of Australia. But the British Advertising Standards Authority said bloody was a swearword, not to be blazoned on buses for children to read.

Bloody is far more acceptable in Australia, but even there, the original tourist ad catchphrase -- "Where the bloody hell are you?" -- was hard for some to swallow. Prime Minister John Howard defended its use, but wouldn't repeat it on the air: "I'm not somebody who uses that expression, certainly not on radio," he told an interviewer in 2006.

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Rules and realities of English usage from Boston Globe Ideas columnist Jan Freeman.
Jan Freeman, a former Boston Globe editor, has been writing the weekly column “The Word” since 1997. E-mail her at freeman@globe.com.
archives

browse this blog

by category