Some states cut property taxes
As town by town fights over Prop 2 1/2 continue in Massachusetts, some states are cutting taxes or resorting to strategies that cut some taxes but raise others, the Wall Street Journal reports.
According to this story, New York Gov. David Paterson last week launched a bid to make New York the latest state to roll back property taxes. Already this year, statehouses in Indiana and Florida have passed new property-tax curbs.
The Journal continues:
But many of these property-tax initiatives, while politically popular, mask a hidden truth: They are likely to lead to increases in other kinds of taxes.
So-called "swaps," under which property taxes are cut and made up for by levies elsewhere, have been popular in statehouses. Idaho, South Carolina and Texas passed their own versions in 2006. But even when states don't make such deals outright, they may in the long run resort to tax increases to plug revenue holes.
The national movement against property taxes dates to the 1970s. But the most recent real-estate bubble has given it more potency in certain regions of the country, like the New York City suburbs. Median property taxes paid in New York's Westchester, Nassau, and Rockland counties all ranked in the top 10 nationally for 2006, according to the nonprofit Tax Foundation.
This March, Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels signed legislation to cut property taxes by an average of 30% and, starting in 2010, to cap the taxes at 1% of assessed value. The state will assume some program costs formerly borne by localities and pay for them by boosting its sales tax to 7% from 6%.
But growth in state sales-tax revenue has slowed to a virtual standstill as consumers adjust to the pain of the housing and credit crunch, according to Nicholas Johnson, director of the State Fiscal Project at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. That could lead states to look to tax increases elsewhere to pick up the slack -- for instance, by broadening the sales-tax base to tax services like health-club memberships or spa services, he said.
That is exactly what critics of new property-tax curbs in Florida are afraid of. Politicians "did not fully appreciate the $11 billion bill left to state governments, which is going to require unprecedented tax increases or cuts in services," says Dominic M. Calabro, president and CEO of Florida TaxWatch, a nonprofit taxpayer group representing businesses and individual taxpayers.
Comment
Permalink
Email
Bridgewater MA will have an over-ride vote this Saturday, also. Just thought you'd want to add this to your blog scorecard.
Opponents of California's Prop 13 and Massachusetts Prop 2 1/2 also used the argument that property tax cuts would lead to increases in other taxes. Yet recent polls show that, 30 and 28 years later, respectively, both these measures would pass again.
Generally, politicians do not read a popular vote to cut property taxes as a request from voters to raise other taxes. To the contrary, the message given by voters is that they are fed up with promises, threats, higher taxes in general. Prop 2 1/2 did get the state to share more state revenues, and this didn't keep voters from supporting repeal of the income tax surcharge a few years later. It took almost twenty years for a major state tax increase to pass in Massachusetts. Note: most states with high property taxes already have high state taxes; lack of support for a property tax cut would be interpreted by politicians as a sign of tolerance for more taxes.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.