< Back to Front Page Text size +

Wellesley okays $86.6-mil for high school

Posted by David Dahl, Regional Editor December 10, 2008 01:06 PM

Wellesley voters Tuesday overwhelmingly approved an $86.6 million debt exclusion to fund a $130 million new high school, the largest capital project in the town's history.

The tally was 5,026 to 2,869, according to unofficial returns available from the town clerk. Selectman Owen Dugan, in announcing the results, called the vote a "resounding mandate."

Supporters of a new high school had argued that the existing building - which includes a 1938 main building, a 1956 wing, and several later additions - does not meet current enrollment or educational needs and could jeopardize the school's accreditation. But opponents had urged voters to renovate and add to the existing building.

Tuesday night, Suzy Littlefield, School Committee chairwoman, congratulated Selectman Katherine L. Babson, who headed up the campaign for the new building, adding that she was pleased to see the town's commitment to education, especially in difficult economic times.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
18 comments so far...
  1. Big Mistake!!

    Here is what will happen--it will cost 30 - 40% more than anticipated, fights will break out over how the work is being done--and when finished late and over budget--you will find that enrollment has declined. Too bad for the citizens--they have been duped again

    Posted by mike gibbs December 10, 08 02:06 PM
  1. New school buildings have been proven to 1) attract the best teachers, 2) improve morale and teacher collaboration, 3) re-focus students on excellence and make them feel important and 4) improve real-estate values. A school makes a statement about how a community values education of its children. Bravo to the town !

    Posted by Kenneth J Weinstein December 11, 08 07:38 AM
  1. This is great for Wayland. Now that Wellesley's tax dollars are tied up in a building, Wayland can become much more academically competitive with the rest of the world (which is where the real competition lies) drawing education-focused parents to our town. Wayland can refuse to buckle to outdated thinking about what makes education valuable, and begin the drive to better schools. Don't be fooled by the paid-for TIMSS results yesterday - our shorter school days and years, our teacher-union-driven priorities, and our overemphasis on peripherals leave the best schools in MA in deep trouble when the competition from overseas is so much stronger.

    Posted by Dawn Davies December 11, 08 09:39 AM
  1. It is ironic that the high school is on warning for academics and the proponents of the new high school say having a new school and hopefully good academics increases the value of real estate. What happened to the academics? I have lived through too many of these building projects in town - the dump, the police station, Sprague school, the library and now the ugly high school building. Where and when does it stop?

    Posted by S.H. Poulton December 11, 08 11:38 AM
  1. Poor Wellesley, if its the cost of the schools,
    then everyone is moving to NEWTON.
    All the "w" towns, Weston, Wayland, Wellesley, heads up.

    Posted by Name Required December 11, 08 05:28 PM
  1. The Massachusetts way! Sure glad I moved out of that state when I had the chance. Pay up, poor citizens

    Posted by ChinaBoy December 17, 08 07:57 AM
  1. UH, this is Wellesley...they can MORE than afford it, even with 30-40% cost increases.
    Only the creme de la creme for that town!

    Posted by N the Bostonian December 17, 08 11:09 AM
  1. with the exception of Kenneth J Weinstein, good comments - uh ken..... you're wrong on 3 out of 4 comments. I am a teacher. Wellesley can't even maintain what they have (the grounds at sprague school are a mess)

    Posted by ted December 18, 08 09:20 AM
  1. Thank God for trade unions....our town in SC just built a HS...state of the art....for under 30 million....go Massachusetts. go Wellesley.

    Posted by snyde December 20, 08 10:41 AM
  1. Is this the answer to the academic failings of the Wellesley school system? Does "throwing money at a problem" necessarily work? How about putting some of the responsibility on the STUDENTS and the PARENTS of those students?

    That $130 million cost will increase to $180+ million by the time the buildings are completed. But new buildings with fancy furnishings do NOT improve student performance - only the students can motivate themselves.

    Perhaps the

    Posted by JH Hill December 22, 08 11:31 AM
  1. Hi JH Hill,
    No, Schooling system can improve, Not only throwing the money but First your administration should be strong and educated.Most of student can never accept the responsibility but thees responsibility can put to their parents.Ya you are right just new building can not improve student performance.
    Thanks

    Posted by quranreading December 25, 08 11:27 PM
  1. Can't wait for all these yups to get their pink slips and face reality! 86 mil during a recession, gimme a break! MORE MONEY THAN BRAINS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by Stupid Wellesleyites yupyup December 29, 08 06:32 PM
  1. I feel sorry for the seniors who have spent their entire lives building up the town just to see it come crumbling down on them. Who on a retirement income can afford to pay for this crap? It's absurd! Glad I don't live there!

    Posted by Disgusting December 29, 08 06:35 PM
  1. Hey snyde, what town on SC built a HS for $30 million. We need those plans!!!!

    Posted by John Dowling January 1, 09 08:03 PM
  1. I am an architect and boy, do I love towns like this. I'd get my ego out and let it run around a bit, but it would take up the whole page. Here's a dirty little secret: if you really want your kids to do better in school -try setting a better example. Try shutting off the TV . Try, I dare you, to live with out the TV or Interent or DVD player, or Gameboy, or Xbox ,or any of the latest distracting junk. Open a book that isn't a romance novel, or the male equivalent, a get-rich-quick-how-to-book. All that money, $86M, is a pimple on the butt of the money spent on this mind-numbing crap....

    Posted by not published January 2, 09 06:02 PM
  1. First time the roof leaks they'll want to tear it down and build a new school.

    Posted by angryjournalist January 3, 09 07:27 AM
  1. The town has changed so much..so sad. They just tore down Wellesey country club. All the new money has changed the town and ruined it. I grew up here and loved it. It was truly a great school system, middle class families where most had morals...they are pushing out old Wellesley and alot of snobby, new money types...

    Posted by Too bad.... January 3, 09 05:05 PM
  1. Didn't Abe Lincoln go to school in a 3 wall hovel? Didn't seem to hurt his ability to learn.

    I run a road race that uses Andover HS as it's starting point. I'm always surprised how trashed the bathrooms are. Stall doors missing. No mirrors. No hot water.

    Not nice.

    Posted by pc January 5, 09 10:49 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About override central Coverage of Prop 21/2 override campaigns in more than 30 communities in Greater Boston.
Christine Wallgren is a correspondent in the Globe South bureau.
David Dahl is the Globe's regional editor.
archives

browse this blog

by category