< Back to Front Page Text size +

What's this? A tax cut?

Posted by David Dahl, Regional Editor January 17, 2009 10:07 AM

Taxes seem to rise inexorably, but in Duxbury local officials are contemplating a cut in the property tax that helps fund community preservation.

A proposal to reduce the town's current 3 percent surcharge to 0.25 percent will be brought before voters at the annual Town Meeting in March, via a citizens' petition.

The Community Preservation Act uses the funds for open space purchases, historic preservation, and affordable housing. But taxpayers also bear the burden of other tax increases for building projects that are pending.

"Our taxes exceed 150 percent of what they were back in 2001 when we voted the Community Preservation Act," said resident James Sullivan, author of the proposed cut. "This is an avenue to lower taxes so we can put a new roof on a school. It's a way to pay for much-needed projects without increasing taxes."

In Duxbury, officials are considering construction of a police station and a fire station, replacing the roof at a school, and an extensive renovation of the municipal pool. Each of those projects would require a temporary tax increase, called a debt exclusion.

So, the CPA tax would drop, but other property taxes would go up, according to this story in Globe South.

Duxbury was one of the first communities to adopt a property-tax surcharge in 2001 under the state's Community Preservation Act. Now the town could become the first to scale back that levy.

"When I first brought this idea to the selectmen a couple months ago, I was looked at like I was a crazy man," Sullivan said of the petition. "The Community Preservation Fund is kind of a sacred cow to many, but I think it's time to revisit it."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
3 comments so far...
  1. the cpa tax will not be cut in this town.duxbury voted by a large margin against question # 1,how can you expect someone to vote to keep one tax and then vote to lower some other tax..

    Posted by john q public January 18, 09 07:25 AM
  1. Affordable housing is a bad term. All housing is affordable, as long as someone can afford it. So called 'affordable housing' should be called 'Subsidized Housing'. A concept where a tiny fraction of lottery winners get dirt cheap housing subsidized by everyone else, thus driving up the cost of living for everyone else.

    Posted by Clarence January 18, 09 10:14 AM
  1. Affordable housing!!!Communism at its best.

    Posted by Tim January 18, 09 09:02 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About override central Coverage of Prop 21/2 override campaigns in more than 30 communities in Greater Boston.
Christine Wallgren is a correspondent in the Globe South bureau.
David Dahl is the Globe's regional editor.
archives

browse this blog

by category