< Back to Front Page Text size +

Walpole approves property tax increase for library

Posted by David Dahl, Regional Editor June 8, 2009 12:18 PM

The margin was about as tight as it could get last Saturday, but Walpole's voters approved a $6.2 million temporary tax increase, called a debt exclusion, so a new public library can be built.

The vote was 2,774 in favor of the override and 2,764 opposed. The total cost of the project is $11.2 million. Debt exclusion funding will be supplemented by a $4 million state grant from the Mass. Board of Library Commissioners and $1 million raised in local donations. According to library trustee Paul Cesary, the new facility should be ready to open in about 27 months.

A $7 million debt exclusion proposal for the library was defeated last November. Since then, library trustees worked to bring the cost down. By May's town meeting, they had lowered the requested amount of the tax increase to $6.2 million. " Between some tweaking and the continuing bad economy, the cost of the project dropped," Cesary said. That will add about $70 to the annual tax bill of an average priced home of $442,000.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
11 comments so far...
  1. I say let's go for 2 out of 3. The first time it was defeated, second time it passed. We are all square - we need one more round to really decide what the town wants. Just like any sport we need to make it fair. Let's play one more time.

    Come on folks - really a library? We already have one - paint it, take down some shelves, buy some new furniture. We don't need to spend money on building a new library - let's get real.

    Posted by Myles June 8, 09 03:47 PM
  1. What a stupid waste of tax dollars, especially in the middle of a recession. Libraries are obsolete; I cannot believe my mortgage will be going up to finance a building that promises to be devoid of human life throughout its existence.

    Posted by The library sucks June 9, 09 10:01 AM
  1. This is a joke. The increase was voted down seven months ago. Leaders then put it on the ballot again in a low turn-out election. This should be against the law.
    My property taxes increased 4 percent this year (the town can decide who has to pay more than 2 1/2 %) and now they'll go up again because of a library. In these tough economic times where there's talk of laying off teachers, police, and firefighters, why are we building a new library for 11.2 million dollars? Can't we just renovate the existing one? With the internet and technology , libraries aren't as necessary as in times past.

    Posted by Pete Anderson June 9, 09 12:23 PM
  1. when something is turned down on a ballot...there should be a 8 year stay before going back on the ballot again..

    Posted by ritchie June 14, 09 08:05 AM
  1. Libraries are obsolete? this is true, the foot traffic alone into libraries has dropped
    68% in the last ten years. I would look to fire the ones involved in pushing this though.
    What we should have done was propose a 16% pay cut for firemen and police?

    This should be done on the state level and also include state police?

    Posted by Cannaan June 14, 09 02:21 PM
  1. "With the internet and technology , libraries aren't as necessary as in times past. "

    The purpose of the public library is to make such technology available to EVERYONE, not simply those who are fortunate enough to have the means to have that technology at home.
    When you speak of "these tough economic times", you have to realize that leaving a large part of the population totally without the means to participate in the electronic democracy and world is small-minded and short-sighted.
    The library is not just books anymore, or did you not realize that because you yourself have not visited it since... foreve??

    Posted by A library fan June 15, 09 08:36 AM
  1. What becomes of the old library building? Do we have money in the budjet to properly staff the new Library? Or are we going to build something we can't afford to operate based on funding cuts?

    Posted by peter banks June 15, 09 10:06 AM
  1. I live in Walpole and dont see the need for a new library. If someone needs research or books let them go to High School up the street. 3 firefighters were laid off so Walpole can get a new library?

    Posted by Rebel June 15, 09 09:21 PM
  1. It's known as Progress.

    Posted by rose June 16, 09 01:08 AM
  1. I have loved libraries since I was a kid and still do. In most suburban towns , however, people do not walk to the library; they drive or get a ride. I can't see why two or three towns can't share the same library. As attendance at these libraries has been on the decline for years, it makes sense to me. Additionally, the one library would have more resources to make book purchases, etc. I've noticed in the last few years that most of the books I ask for in the library have to be ordered from another town as our library does not have a copy. I waited two months for one book and by that time I'd actually forgotten why I wanted to read it in the first place.

    Posted by Joanne June 16, 09 10:10 AM
  1. What happens if (or should I say WHEN) the state tells us they don't have the four million, like for the prison?

    Posted by Walpole Townie June 18, 09 03:22 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About override central Coverage of Prop 21/2 override campaigns in more than 30 communities in Greater Boston.
Christine Wallgren is a correspondent in the Globe South bureau.
David Dahl is the Globe's regional editor.
archives

browse this blog

by category