THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Fed's Lacker says inflation is a problem

Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Alister Bull
April 17, 2008

CHARLOTTE, North Carolina (Reuters) - The U.S. economy is going through a contraction but inflation is too high and may not abate as hoped, a top Federal Reserve policy-maker said on Thursday.

"Inflation is a problem now. It is too high and personally I would be uncomfortable in waiting for economic slack to bring it down," Richmond Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Lacker told reporters on the sidelines of a conference here.

"I am particularly concerned about movements in measures of expected inflation," he said.

Lacker is not a voting member of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee this year. He is seen as one of the most hawkish Fed policy-makers and voted repeatedly for higher interest rates in 2006, when the Fed stopped raising its benchmark overnight funds rate.

Falling U.S. house prices and the collapse of the subprime mortgage market have chilled growth and Lacker acknowledged the economy had faltered. But he ducked the question of whether the economy was now in a recession.

"It is important not to get wrapped up in dancing on the head of a semantic pin," he said.

"I am expecting a contraction in economic activity in the first half of this year. And whether the NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) decides it is a recession ... I am willing to wait," he said, referring to the country's official arbiter of the business cycle.

The Fed has slash rates 3 percentage points to 2.25 percent since mid-September to shield the economy from the housing crisis and resulting market strains. Lacker said the economy was not yet out of the woods and the healing process would take time.

"It is not over yet. I don't think it is going to end all at once," he said.

"I think the crucial variable is stability in the retail housing market, in a broad enough number of geographies that we can have some confidence about where housing prices are going.

"The other major source of uncertainty that I think is consequential is nonresidential construction spending, and we'll just have to see how that plays out," he said.

Lacker declined to say if he would have dissented at the last meeting, when the U.S. central bank lowered its benchmark overnight funds rate 75 basis points to 2.25 percent, but made plain that he was not at ease with current price pressures.

"I am uncertain about the extent it will moderate," he said, when asked about the Fed's forecast that inflation will be kept in check by the slackening U.S. economy.

"Looking at our record over the last 4 years of inflation that has fluctuated between just below 2 percent and (above) 3-1/2 percent, the danger in that pattern persisting is that people might become accustomed to it, and come to expect inflation to continue at rates greater than we would like to see," he said.

Soaring energy and food prices pushed the U.S. March consumer price index up 0.3 percent from the previous month, and up 4 percent versus a year ago. Core consumer prices, which strip out volatile energy and food costs, rose 0.2 percent on the month and are up 2.4 percent from a year ago.

"A deterioration of inflation psychology is a major concern because it is very difficult to unwind," he said.

Lacker said recent emergency Fed steps to stop the financial system from seizing up, which include a $29 billion package to encourage JPMorgan Chase to rescue investment bank Bear Stearns, may have boosted prices in some asset markets. But he warned they could have serious consequences.

"No matter what the short-term benefits of that action were, or the other credit market interventions that we have undertaken, there is undoubtedly a risk of adverse incentive effects down the road and perhaps even in the near term as well," he said.

(Editing by Neil Stempleman)

(Reporting by Alister Bull; editing by Neil Stempleman)

more stories like this

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.