Fidelity's inaction speaks volumes

Eighteen months after Investors Against Genocide first highlighted Fidelity's investments in companies that help to fund genocide, and after millions of Fidelity's shareholders voted for the genocide-free investing proposal preventing such investments, Fidelity now claims that it remains invested out of concern for the people of Sudan ("Fidelity won't relent on divestment," June 19).

The proposal received affirmative votes from as many as 31 percent of shareholders. Despite the large number of concerned shareholders, Fidelity has done nothing to leverage its large investments to engage with the companies that are underwriting this crime against humanity. Additionally, it has decided to halt the voting process for seven of its funds, before the final results are recorded and shareholders learn the results.

If Fidelity's intentions are sincere, the company should promptly and publicly arrange for a meeting with the president of PetroChina asking that it, along with its closely related parent, CNPC, immediately engage with the genocidal government of Sudan on behalf of the Darfuri people. If after three months PetroChina is unresponsive, Fidelity should divest its holdings with a public announcement regarding its reasons. Any lesser actions will demonstrate that Fidelity's stated reasons for holding these investments are disingenuous.

We look forward to Fidelity's public disclosure regarding its plans for a vigorous engagement effort with firm deadlines and meaningful consequences if PetroChina does not take action to help end the genocide.

Susan Morgan, director of communications, Investors Against Genocide

According to Brian Rosman of Health Care for All, the state was aware in late May that 16,000 notices (some dated as early as April 30) had not been sent, but did nothing to communicate the problem to anyone until the problem was discovered in the third week in June by contracted outreach workers ("Error puts 16,000 in dark about benefits," June 24). While the work of Rosman's group and the other 44 outreach nonprofits has been instrumental in getting state subsidized, commercial insurance for many thousands, the broader view shows that the inefficient, bureaucratic nonsystem that is "Massachusetts Health Reform" is a big, money wasting false promise.

Rosman cites this bungle as a reason to continue state $3.5 million funding of the 45 nonprofits. What any sensible citizen should see is that by awarding these grants, the state further abdicates its responsibility to internal efficiency and wise use of taxpayers' dollars. Extra layers of administration add to the already stunningly fragmented patchwork that is now the law of the land.

A common sense use of our healthcare dollars should remove all middlemen, including nonprofit agencies and insurance companies alike. A national single payer heath system is the only solution.

Nancy E. McAvenia,Whitman

HAVE AN OPINION? Letters intended for publication should include the writer's name, address, and daytime phone number. All letters are subject to editing. E-mail letters to business@globe.com; fax to 617-929-3183; or mail to Business Letters, The Boston Globe, P.O. Box 55819, Boston, MA 02205-5819.