THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Still a Mini, though not as small

The Clubman is by no means as workable as a four-door, but it's better than climbing into the backseat of a two-door. The Clubman is by no means as workable as a four-door, but it's better than climbing into the backseat of a two-door. (BMW AG)
Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Joe Wiesenfelder
Cars.com / May 31, 2008

The Mini Cooper Clubman is a stretched Mini Cooper, and with that comes the advantages and disadvantages of larger size. Also along with it come the advantages that make the regular Cooper such a hit. Unfortunately, though, some of that car's disadvantages also carry over, and they've gotten no less troublesome since this generation's 2007 debut.

I reviewed the regular Cooper S for 2007, and it's unchanged for 2008. Most of those impressions hold true for the Cooper S Clubman, so I'll concentrate here on how this new body style differs from the smaller one.

The Cooper Clubman is almost 10 inches longer from bumper to bumper than the regular model, which makes it look different enough to draw stares from passersby. I don't think they knew why they were staring, but they could tell something was going on. Mini doesn't spell it out for you in the form of a badge; the only place my car said "CLUBMAN" was on the floormats.

Though the car's pretty much the same from the B-pillar forward, a couple of other characteristics stand out: There's an additional access door on one side, and a pair of opposing swing doors in back replace the liftgate.

The extra length translates to more interior space, which is basically the point of the Clubman. The biggest difference is in the cargo volume behind the backseat, which is up 61 percent in the Clubman. In the regular model, you have little space to work with if the folding backseat is occupied. When the Clubman's backseat is folded flat, the total cargo volume is 37 percent greater than the Cooper's. It doesn't sound as impressive when stated in cubic feet, but the extra length makes a difference when you're loading cargo.

It makes a difference in the passenger compartment, too, with 2.4 inches of additional backseat legroom. That may not seem like much either, but inches really count when it comes to interior dimensions. (Competing vehicles are often within an inch or two of each other in this regard.) If you've never been in a Cooper, you may not know that the headroom is actually quite good; the challenge has always been for front occupants to give backseat passengers enough room without crowding themselves. It's still an issue, but at least there's more room to work with.

The access door might be more attractive to shoppers than the extra legroom because it makes it easier to climb in. The Clubman is by no means as workable as a four-door, but it's better than climbing into the backseat of a two-door - or even the driver's side of a Clubman. It's good to have this extra door on the curb side rather than the street side, for safety's sake. Technically, the Mini brand is from Great Britain, where cars are steered from the "wrong" side of the car on the "wrong" side of the road, so we're lucky the door does not open into traffic. Perhaps it's because Mini is owned by BMW, of Germany, where steering wheels are on the correct side and they generally do things right.

Though the Clubman is like the regular model in many ways, its length affects performance. The main difference I felt was in the car's handling, which is probably the result of its longer wheelbase and additional weight behind the driver. The regular Cooper's short wheelbase is key to its darty, go-kart feel. The Clubman's rear wheels are only 3.2 inches farther back, but in terms of a car's geometry, that's significant. I took to a skid pad in regular and Clubman versions of the Cooper S, back-to-back, and found the Clubman to be less darty. The steering ratio is the same, so the response isn't quite as sharp when combined with a longer wheelbase. To me, this makes the driving experience less involving. The Clubman has very good dynamics, and is more fun to drive than many - I might even say most - cars you can buy, but it doesn't quite match its smaller brother.

Theoretically, a longer wheelbase should provide a smoother ride, but I can't confirm or refute that for the Clubman because my test car had not only the S trim level's firmer suspension, but also an additional Sport Package option that includes 17-inch wheels and extra-firm suspension tuning. To put it indelicately, my test car's ride quality was miserable.

Fortunately, we also got a regular Clubman in for review, and it was dramatically more livable. I can't draw any direct conclusions, but you certainly shouldn't give up on the S trim level. With the base suspension and/or better roads, you might be perfectly happy.

As for acceleration and braking, the character is pretty much the same as in the Cooper, but the S Clubman's additional curb weight - almost 200 pounds more than the regular Cooper - cuts its 0-60 mph time by a few tenths of a second. According to Mini, the manual Clubman S does it in 7.0 seconds and the automatic takes 7.2 seconds. There's no gas mileage penalty for the Clubman body style. How is this possible in a heavier car? It could be because aerodynamics tend to improve as a car's length increases. Unfortunately, premium gas is recommended for all Minis, but they can run on regular with slightly diminished power and efficiency.

The interior has no great drawbacks compared to the regular Cooper. The view to the rear is pretty good; the C-pillar is similar in size, but it's farther away than in the regular model, so it seems to obscure less of your view. The Dutch doors result in a center post, though, which blocks the rear view somewhat. It's not too bad when looking over your shoulder, but it takes up a significant chunk of what is already a small rearview mirror.

Most of the Clubman's drawbacks are also found in the regular Cooper. Sometimes we adjust to problems over time, but these have become more annoying. The dual-pane panoramic moonroof is great, but the mesh sun shades fail utterly at their main task, which, to my way of thinking, is to provide shade from the sun. They don't isolate you from noise or temperature extremes, either.

The center-of-dash speedometer is still a problem. I don't mind its location, but when I look at it I see a dominant glowing gas gauge and lots of dots and lines. What I don't see easily enough are the numbers that tell me how fast I'm going. The controls are scattered and the silver plastic is cheesy in an otherwise well-executed interior. On the upside, the car now has both an analog audio input and a USB port. The latter lets you connect any cheapo flash drive full of music and have the stereo itself serve as the MP3 player, complete with menus. Mini's isn't the best I've seen, but it's a nice alternative to buying an expensive MP3 player.

Since Mini brought out the Cooper convertible, I've been wondering what it would do next. It had to broaden its product line at least somewhat - but would a Mini SUV still be a Mini? Probably not. The Clubman seems the right move, addressing the major drawbacks of the original. I don't know if it goes far enough in that regard, but greater growth would risk changing the character of the model, if not the brand. Now that fuel prices are high and likely to stay that way, small and efficient is a good way to go, and for its turbocharged acceleration, the S trim level is relatively efficient. As a whole, the Cooper model is not the cheapest small car, but I think it's well-priced, and Mini is way ahead of the curve in offering individual, a la carte options so you can pick and choose what you want - especially cosmetic features - without making you pay for things you don't.

more stories like this

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.