RadioBDC Logo
Riptide | Vance Joy Listen Live
 
 
< Back to front page Text size +

The Race For Senate And The Iraq War

Posted by Garrett Quinn, Less is More  March 20, 2013 09:03 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

IraqWar.jpgAs we reflect on the anniversary of the Iraq War we should take a look back at how one of the most controversial American foreign policy decision in history came about. Massachusetts had 10 congressmen, in addition to its two senators, on Captiol Hill at the time, all Democrats. Half of the delegation that voted on the authorization of the Iraq War is no longer present. Here's how they voted:

House

NAY D Olver, John MA 1st
NAY D Neal, Richard MA 2nd
NAY D McGovern, Jim MA 3rd
NAY D Frank, Barney MA 4th
YEA D Meehan, Marty MA 5th
NAY D Tierney, John MA 6th
YEA D Markey, Ed MA 7th
NAY D Capuano, Michael MA 8th
YEA D Lynch, Stephen MA 9th
NAY D Delahunt, Bill MA 10th

Senate

YEA D Kerry, John MA
NAY D Kennedy, Edward MA

Kerry and Meehan have departed the steps of Capitol Hill for greener pastures but Markey and Lynch are still around, currently jockeying to fill Kerry's old seat. Here's what Markey had to say on his vote:

"Ten years ago, the Bush administration perpetrated a fraud on Congress and the American people and launched an invasion into Iraq even though the administration knew that there were no nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction," Markey said. "As a result, we fought a conflict that cost thousands of lives, billions of dollars, and untold damage."

Here's Lynch:h

“Before they had one strongman, Saddam Hussein, who made all the decisions and through force and through oppression he pushed his agenda. They never had the responsibility of sitting down across the table and arguing out their issues,” Lynch told reporters.
...
“I think our error, which I do regret, is that we moved too quickly,” he said.

It's easy to say now, ten years later, that the war "moved too quickly" as Lynch said or a "fraud" as Markey said but where were they 4,486 American lives and $6 trillion ago?

The Republicans in the race leave much to be desired, too.

State Rep. Dan Winslow issued a statement saying we're all better off Hussein is gone.

‘‘They ended the reign of Saddam Hussein who was a destabilizing presence in the Middle East,’’ Winslow said in a statement. ‘‘There is no doubt that the world is a better and safer place with the end of this dangerous dictator who was an exporter of terrorism.’’

Sullivan had something similar to say in a statement on his website:

Mike Sullivan supported the goal of helping to build a free Iraq that would respect the human rights of its people and create a more peaceful and secure Middle East -- benefiting not only that region but the world.

Gomez, the only Republican in the race with military experience, was pretty vague about where he stood on the war when talking with the Springfield Republican. He issued a statement, too, where he talked about care for returning veterans.

“You can talk about it differently now, because obviously there’s been evidence that maybe he didn't have weapons of mass destruction,” Gomez said. “But leading up to that point, the right thing to do was to go into Afghanistan, go after al Qaida, its safe haven, and if you really thought there was weapons of mass destruction like a lot of people did…You've got 30 plus Democrats who voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq.”
This blog is not written or edited by Boston.com or the Boston Globe.
The author is solely responsible for the content.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

 

About the author

Garrett Quinn began writing for newspapers at age 17 with CNC in his native South Shore. He has been published in BlueMassGroup, RedMassGroup, Pioneer Investigates, and Wonkette. He is a More »

More community voices

Child in Mind

Corner Kicks

Dirty Old Boston

Mortal Matters

On Deck

TEDx Beacon Street

archives

Browse this blog

by category