Game over / The show cannot go on without them: Who is truly irreplaceable?
posted at 7/19/2012 12:24 PM EDT
There seems to be a dividing line between fans who will say that "the band is dead to me" when a key member leaves, for any reason (and certainly in the unfortunate cases of an untimely death) and those that seem to roll with the "musical chairs" of members coming and going, that many long-standing, bands have to accept as a way of life. It's the music industry, afterall.
Who, what member, in your estimation, regarding active bands, is absolutely, irrefutably irreplaceable? No ifs, ands of buts, it's game over if this person were to leave for any reason (might be the front man, might be the guitarist ...), but there is simply no way, no how, that this person could ever be replaced. Even if *all* other members of the band are key, this person's absence would put the band in the tank.
What do you think? ETA: Then again, Queen survived, not that everyone has been satisfied with the replacement(s).
I would name Eddie Vedder, for starters; No Vedder, no Pearl Jam. Seems that way to me, but you may think there's a replacement out there in the blue.