1. You have chosen to ignore posts from undead. Show undead's posts

    Re: A message for women

     Last I checked, Mourdock doesn't represent the entire party. Nor does Obama represent his entire party. Don't write someone off because of the party they belong to. Write them off because of what they believe in.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: A message for women

    Reagan opposed abortion personally, and disagreed with Roe.  Reagan made THREE SCOTUS appointments (including the first woman ever) and elevated Rehnquist to Chief justice.

    Roe didn't move an inch.

    Bush 41 the same, leading us to a SCOTUS with SEVEN republican appointments.

    Roe didn't move an inch.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: A message for women

    In response to Kirk6's comment:

    The next president will appoint justices to the Supreme Court.

    Elect Romney and they will take away a women's right to choose.




    Just like Reagan did.

    We had 7 republican appointees on SCOTUS and Roe didn't change an inch.

    You look quite silly

     

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from AZPAT. Show AZPAT's posts

    Re: A message for women

    I wonder how many folks out there feel like i DO:

    I really don't care if a woman does/doesn't abort. My issues are simple:  1) NO federal $$ should be spent on it, even for "low income victims" of pregnancy (PROVEN rape and incest excepted; the fact it happened, having the perp arrested, charged, and indicted, NOT an actual conviction, post trial)     2) A safety net is put in place for the males/baby daddies to opt out of child support if the mother wants to carry full term (Why should the decision rest solely with the mother? After all, it's the male's wallet that has an interest too. Should we elaborate on the fact that it takes two to conceive? This provides full protection under the law. BOTH parties, in the majority of unwanted pregnancies could have, yet didn't act responsibly to prevent the pregnancy during their intimacy.)    3) There is sufficient information AND items out there that can 99.9% guarandamntee unwanted pregnancies. Failure to access them is an act of irresponsibility. No excuses, including but not limited to: embarrassment, didn't think it would happen to me, only the first time, etc, and other excuses. With so much stuff out ther, the only women that get pregnant WANT to get pregnant, or else they would have availed themselves of adequate protection. (Sorry, not going to even consider the excuse of the birth control failing. Failing products are off the market.)