An inconvenient truth

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from WilliamTells. Show WilliamTells's posts

    An inconvenient truth

    So I guess taking hostages at the Discovery Channel was what Al Gore meant when he said last week to make things happen?

    Didn't see anything mentioned about Al Gore, His fake movie (the ice falling part is animated), and the hostage taker being tied together.

    If a Beck or Palin or Bush or Tea Party or Republican was taking hostages I think we'd see this mentioned don't you?

    The globe is so chicken about the commentary on this story it's not allowed.  How 'bout some fact reporting and some free speech?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from SnarkyTart. Show SnarkyTart's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    "global warming" is a high price tag just like "bridal makeup" and "low carb".  the earth is in constant flux.  move to mars if you dont like it here.  change is inevitable.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Goright. Show Goright's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    This is brilliant and absolutely true--another prog eats a bullet. The cult of man made global warming usually makes me laugh, but an incident like this is really unnerving.

    If there were any evidence of him leaning to the right, the media would be regurgitating this story for weeks to come. Since it’s clear he’s a whack job lefty/lib/prog this story will disappear soon enough. Just like that IRS plane crash pilot in Austin.

    Oh I almost forgot my favorite: remember the times square bomber? Bloomberg (big government, nanny state lib) was on the news almost immediately speculating the culprit was some home-grown loony toon who didn’t like the healthcare bill.

    Left-Right only separates socialist and non-socialist, that’s why fascists are rightly on the left side with, and just to the right of their fellow socialists, the commies. What on the left isn’t socialist?


     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]So I guess taking hostages at the Discovery Channel was what Al Gore meant when he said last week to make things happen? Didn't see anything mentioned about Al Gore, His fake movie (the ice falling part is animated), and the hostage taker being tied together. If a Beck or Palin or Bush or Tea Party or Republican was taking hostages I think we'd see this mentioned don't you? The globe is so chicken about the commentary on this story it's not allowed.  How 'bout some fact reporting and some free speech?
    Posted by WilliamTells[/QUOTE]

    Well,  I think part of the difference is that the conservatives tend to be relatively normal people who work and go to church, or at least are respectful of those who do.

    the left, particularly those who follow The Sacred Global Warming theology, are generally unhinged alarmists, hanging on Gore's every word.  It is only surprising that there are not more Global Warmists taking people out.  This is what happens when you whip up people who are generally unstable, as most progressives are.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]In Response to An inconvenient truth : Well,  I think part of the difference is that the conservatives tend to be relatively normal people who work and go to church, or at least are respectful of those who do. the left, particularly those who follow The Sacred Global Warming theology, are generally unhinged alarmists, hanging on Gore's every word.  It is only surprising that there are not more Global Warmists taking people out.  This is what happens when you whip up people who are generally unstable, as most progressives are.
    Posted by skeeter20[/QUOTE]

    Gee, 97% of surveyed climatologists indicate that climate change is real and man has a role in it.  Just a Lefty conspiracy of unhinged alarmist SCIENTISTS.  You are an ostrich man.  This is not about politics it is about science.  P.S. the world is not flat either.  And evolution is reality.  Gravity will get you too.

    http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-19/world/eco.globalwarmingsurvey_1_global-warming-climate-science-human-activity?_s=PM:WORLD

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS36547248620100624
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth : Gee, 97% of surveyed climatologists indicate that climate change is real and man has a role in it.  Just a Lefty conspiracy of unhinged alarmist SCIENTISTS.  You are an ostrich man.  This is not about politics it is about science.  P.S. the world is not flat either.  And evolution is reality.  Gravity will get you too. http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-19/world/eco.globalwarmingsurvey_1_global-warming-climate-science-human-activity?_s=PM:WORLD http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS36547248620100624
    Posted by Reubenhop[/QUOTE]

    Seeing we live on a four billion year old rock, I'm not planning my future based on 20 years of wacko liberal enviro-theology.  Afterall, when I was younger, it was the Global Winter scare.  The enviro wackos just bounce between the two.

    The bottom line of golbal warming theory is that it blames everything on us parasitic humans who should do what the Discovery Channel nut wants us to do, which is to off the human race so the planet "survives".

    Global warming is just more elitist leftist nonsense, not to be confused with really caring about the environment, whihc once again, comes back to the ONE THING the left doesn't want, personal repsponsibility to act properly.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from SnarkyTart. Show SnarkyTart's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    with  ya  skeeter  20.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from WilliamTells. Show WilliamTells's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    We should probably remember that those 97% of climate change "scientists" have their hands out to the government for funding.  When global cooling theories cooled "pun intended" in the 70's and the cooling funding went cold (another one) then suddenly global warming appeared.

    so we see the eaths cycles plainly evident and we see those who are making a buck off of them.  Good for Al Gore a capitalist pig wagging his finger at capitalists while he laughs all the way to the bank.  A few innocent lives lost for his capitalist cause - well too bad.

    Can I find a lawyers who will sue Al Gore for 828 billion dollars for this hoax?  The ice falling, the most famous shot - the trailer shot - the one that sells the movie - it's animated. It's fake.  The whole movement is fake. 

    Of course there is global climate change:  The earth warms and cools in cycles and that's called change - can I get my 250 million bucks now?
     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from drvinny. Show drvinny's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth : Seeing we live on a four billion year old rock, I'm not planning my future based on 20 years of wacko liberal enviro-theology.  Afterall, when I was younger, it was the Global Winter scare.  The enviro wackos just bounce between the two. The bottom line of golbal warming theory is that it blames everything on us parasitic humans who should do what the Discovery Channel nut wants us to do, which is to off the human race so the planet "survives". Global warming is just more elitist leftist nonsense, not to be confused with really caring about the environment, whihc once again, comes back to the ONE THING the left doesn't want, personal repsponsibility to act properly.
    Posted by skeeter20[/QUOTE]

    Don't forget that there are many more scare topics to pick from
    Swine Flu
    Avian Flu
    Acid Rain was a good one
    Record amount of hurricanes coming each year
    Bedbugs
    Te*party racism

    I posted a topic yesterday and it's gone. Did the Boston Globe delete it because it contained a link to a story about lefties protesting in favor of comprehensive immigration reform?

    http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/05/02/violent-left-wing-nuts-riot-burn-down-a-coffee-house-and-smash-windows-to-protest-in-favor-of-illegal-immigration-media-still-silent/
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]Tim McVeigh was a white Christian whackjob and ergo republican. The fact this guy was an left wing eco nut is irrelevant. Try to remember that. 
    Posted by GreginMeffa[/QUOTE]

    I'm trying, I'm trying.  But, I keep getting hung up on the "christian" part, seeing that by his own admission, he was a secular humanist:  I.e. a lefty when iut comes to religion.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from OscarBozachT00. Show OscarBozachT00's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth : Gee, 97% of surveyed climatologists indicate that climate change is real and man has a role in it.  Just a Lefty conspiracy of unhinged alarmist SCIENTISTS.  You are an ostrich man.  This is not about politics it is about science.  P.S. the world is not flat either.  And evolution is reality.  Gravity will get you too. http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-19/world/eco.globalwarmingsurvey_1_global-warming-climate-science-human-activity?_s=PM:WORLD http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS36547248620100624
    Posted by Reubenhop[/QUOTE]

    Reubenhop, are you paid to keep making the same silly claims on every man-made global warming post?  Are you related to Al Gore?

    You looked silly before... but now that you keep spewing this nonsense... you look like the DNC mascot.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from shumirules. Show shumirules's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In 1990 we had 10 years to save the world from global warming.
    In 1995 we had 10 years.
    In  2000 We only had 10 years to save the earth.
    IN 2004 we were down to 10 Years to save the earth.
    By the time Obama won in 2008 we had only 10 years to save the earth.
    I have a feeling in 2016 we will only have 10 years to save the World. 

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from topaz978. Show topaz978's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    Hmm,
    Just finished and interesting article in science. It is an analysis of sea levels in certain formations that are on the order of the last 50MY. That analysis showed no corellation with co2 and sealevel. These are in the most difficult range since the glaciers that everyone is freaked out about are transitory. 20MY is about the oldest. On a planet where 5-15MY ago primates started to look like humans this is important. The climate that is now is, never was a stable thing. For many millions of years. The changes recently in the last 250Y are not noteable in the last 20MY. Will sea level rise? Look we live on a planet where most arable land was created during a time millions of years ago that it was under water.
    Do we have to blame our energy use? Maybe. How much?
    New Orleans is sinking due to the corps of engineers and bad planing. Bangladesh was hopeless 40Y ago due to damming of the river silt and stupid notions that preventing floods that delivered soil to compensate for geologic sinking started a decline in the height of the delta. Vietnam and many productive river deltas will see the same problem. So how do you warm a planet and prove it, that has seen many instances of warming and crustal change in the millions of years prior to humans? Sea level is not neccesarily depending on glaciers but the movement of crustal magma.
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth : Reubenhop, are you paid to keep making the same silly claims on every man-made global warming post?  Are you related to Al Gore? You looked silly before... but now that you keep spewing this nonsense... you look like the DNC mascot.
    Posted by OscarBozachT00[/QUOTE]

    Scientists are smarter than you.  It is not about politics.  You live in a box of your own creation.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    In Response to Re: An inconvenient truth:
    [QUOTE]We should probably remember that those 97% of climate change "scientists" have their hands out to the government for funding.  When global cooling theories cooled "pun intended" in the 70's and the cooling funding went cold (another one) then suddenly global warming appeared. so we see the eaths cycles plainly evident and we see those who are making a buck off of them.  Good for Al Gore a capitalist pig wagging his finger at capitalists while he laughs all the way to the bank.  A few innocent lives lost for his capitalist cause - well too bad. Can I find a lawyers who will sue Al Gore for 828 billion dollars for this hoax?  The ice falling, the most famous shot - the trailer shot - the one that sells the movie - it's animated. It's fake.  The whole movement is fake.  Of course there is global climate change:  The earth warms and cools in cycles and that's called change - can I get my 250 million bucks now?
    Posted by WilliamTells[/QUOTE]

    97% of scientists sold their souls for the all mighty dollar.  Sure that makes a lot of sense.  Much more likely is that you don't know what you are talking about. 
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Mike473. Show Mike473's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth



    I will believe Al Gore on global warming just as soon as he produces evidence on how well NAFTA & GATT has worked for the American worker. As you may recal, fighting for NAFTA was his last gig.  
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from movingtarget2. Show movingtarget2's posts

    Re: An inconvenient truth

    Do you hate all things Mexican?  Is free trade so vile to you that you would kick Eva Longoria out of bed?  Or is Evan Longoria something you might take an interest in?
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share