STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from AlleyCatBruin. Show AlleyCatBruin's posts

    Re: STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

    I wonder why so many of the remaining Catholics are republicans?
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from 8101956. Show 8101956's posts

    Re: STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

    AlleyCatBruins we should ask Scott Brown that question. 
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Goright. Show Goright's posts

    Re: STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

    Common practice among the gayly clad community of San francisco. Nothing new here. These boys are referred to as "twinks" by the gay community in the progressive society of the bay area. In ancient Rome, male homosexuals called them catamites--this of course preceded the progressive renaming of such to twinks.
     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from topaz978. Show topaz978's posts

    Re: STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

    Yeah the dems tend to poke their opp sex interns. The religious repurves just poke what they got.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from topaz978. Show topaz978's posts

    Re: STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.

    In Response to STARK EXAMPLES of CHILD SEX ABUSE under our EXISTING CHUCH LEADERS.:
    [QUOTE]Direct from the recent Philadelphia Grand Jury Report:   "These are the kinds of things that Archdiocese priests did to children: ®      A girl, 11 years old, was raped by her priest and became pregnant. The Father took her in for an abortion. ®      A 5th-grader was molested by her priest inside the confessional booth. ®      A teenage girl was groped by her priest while she lay immobilized in traction ina hospital bed. The priest stopped only when the girl was able to ring for a nurse. ®      A boy was repeatedly molested in his own school auditorium, where his priest/teacher bent the boy over and rubbed his genitals against the boy until the priest ejaculated. ®      A priest, no longer satisfied with mere pederasty, regularly began forcing sex on two boys at once in his bed. ®      A boy woke up intoxicated in a priest’s bed to find the Father sucking on his (male member) while three other priests watched and masturbated themselves ®      A priest offered money to boys in exchange for sadomasochism – directing them to place him in bondage, to “break” him, to make him their “slave,” and to defecate so that he could lick excrement from them. ®      A 12-year-old, who was raped and sodomized by his priest, tried to commit suicide, and remains institutionalized in a mental hospital as an adult. ®      A priest told a 12-year-old boy that his mother knew of and had agreed to the priest’s repeated rape of her son ®      A boy who told his father about the abuse his younger brother was suffering was beaten to the point of unconsciousness. “Priests don’t do that,” said the father as he punished his son for what he thought was a vicious lie against the clergy."   SOURCE:   www.philadelphiadistrictattorney.com/images/Grand_Jury_Report.pdf " /> www.philadelphiadistrictattorney.com/images/Grand_Jury_Report.pdf
    Posted by Bopanopawitz[/QUOTE]

    This is opinion and testimony. Not fact. These can only be used in a balanced and cross examined court as true testimony. The grand jury takes statements and issues no proof of evidence. You can lie to a grand jury or present an untrue sequence of events and be found to have only represented your view. In trial court you are held to a higher standard. When anyone uses this level of evidence to malign and accuse in the public media they are practicing a level of false statement. The person stating the grand jury ruling must always state that these actions were alledged and that the persons involved are not shown to be guilty. A grand jury does not alledge guilt. In fact if one presents a grand jury finding as guilt of a crime they are presenting false statements.
     

Share