The Tea Party Terrorists

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Your Exhibit "A" is far more applicable to the right than it is to the left.  Incindiary language that demonizes the opposition?  That's how you all are defending against the progressive conspiracy you invented.  Don't retreat reload!
    Posted by Reubenhop


    I have had it with the wild accusations.  Proof.  Show me proof.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to The Tea Party Terrorists:
    Who were the ones carrying guns at rallies? And wasn't it Crosshairs Palin who urged her followers to re-load? It was a republican candidate for office who suggested a "2nd Amendment Remedy". 
    Posted by AlleyCatBruin

    Who were the ones carrying guns at rallies?  - YES and no one got shot!
    And wasn't it Crosshairs Palin who urged her followers to re-load? - Right again. She stole it from the DLC and their bulls-eye map of red states (including Arizona BTW) with the "Behind enemy lines" tag.
    It was a republican candidate for office who suggested a "2nd Amendment Remedy".  - Right again! But is was the Democrat POTUS who said "if they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun".
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : I've seen far worse images of Obama at the Tea Party Gun Nut rallies. You don't comdemn those, but you are upset by a harlmess graphic of BunnyPants Bush? If you want real anger and hate, just listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch FOX News. Better yet, attend a Tea Party rally.
    Posted by AlleyCatBruin

    Right Alley, harmless images of Bush... HYPOCRITE!



     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    It's kind of like the weapons of mass destruction -- I know it's there but I just can't find it. PS -- here's another of your homeboys at work: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/137601-gops-gohmert-plans-to-introduce-bill-to-allow-firearms-on-house-floor
    Posted by Ergoetal

    Here are your home boys at work...

    http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Your Exhibit "A" is far more applicable to the right than it is to the left.  Incindiary language that demonizes the opposition?  That's how you all are defending against the progressive conspiracy you invented.  Don't retreat reload!
    Posted by Reubenhop

    Come on Reuben! Anyone against illegal immigration is racist. Anyone against gay marriage is a homophobe. Anyone against race quotas is racist. That is the Democrat playbook for the last 40+ years!

    Who wrote this... And more importantly, WHO FOLLOWS THIS?!

    Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Palin is inciting violence.  Her irresponsible rhetoric has caused her to be targeted by death threats.  If you poison the well you should not complain that the water tastes bad. Thinking people condemn the threats.  They also condemn the violent imagery that she so gleefully played with.
    Posted by Reubenhop


    What irresponsible rhetoric?  You need to cite examples that are clear and convincing.  I'll make it easy.  Look for comments like "I want you to get in their face".

    But, you won't find it, because your charges are baseless.  Your attack is unwarranted and irresponsible. 

    Why don't you step back from the rhetoric, and consider your approach.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from EVASION. Show EVASION's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    Feel stupid now that it has come to light that this unhinged psychopath who shot up tuscon had no political identity?

    You punks are lower than worms. 

    So now you want to ban symbols?  And now in reubenshop's America-  it is ok for threaten with free speech with physical violence?

    Punk.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from EVASION. Show EVASION's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    Come on.  Cough up your proof for TEA party terrorist or Palin inciting violence.  come on.  do it."

    OK.  Palin using the term "blood libel" as a defense.

    What's your answer?

    There is no evidence.  They are cowards.  Paper tigers.  Punks.  Undergraduate bumper-sticker losers. 

    You are hearing the death throes of the progressive movement Laughing

    Music to my ears
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BobinVa. Show BobinVa's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    Michelle Malkin:
    Instapundit/law professor Glenn Reynolds assailed the politics of “blood libel” in the Wall Street Journal.

    Then www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=487510653434">Sarah Palin issued her own poignant, but fierce rejoinder against the vicious smears of Tucson massacre opportunists and drew on “America’s enduring strength” to pay tribute to the victims.

    They criticized her for not saying anything. (MSNBC put up a scroll at the bottom of their screen: Palin: ON THE LAM)

    Now, they’ll criticizing her for saying something.

    The blamestream media is already up in arms — can we still say that? — over the use of the phrase “blood libel.” Ben Smith at Politico has an exchange with Glenn Reynolds about the term www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0111/The_origins_of_blood_libel.html?showall">here. Jim Geraghty notes that www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/145640.php">leftists have had no problem applying the phrase to the GOP.

    The more moronic of Palin-bashers will simply gnash their teeth because she said “blood.” Idiocracy: The new normal.
    Some have reasonably criticized the use of the term. Notably , Alan Dershowitz had no problem with it; the Anti Defamation league leader Foxman didnt like the use of the term (HEADLINE) ,  but agreed with Palin's larger  point that she was attacked unfairly by the Ghoul Left (NOT HEADLINED).
    WSJ piece this morning by a rabbi definding the use of the term. 
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703583404576079823067585318.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion
     
    What is undisputed is , just like in other instances, Palin is eviscerated for THE EXACT SAME WORDS used on leftist network MSNBC, by liberals such as Eugene Robinson and many others.  
    Howling moonbat Ed Schultz accuses Palin of using “rhetorical dog whistles” in the term “Blood Libel,” and Abracadabra! A 650-word piece appears examining the theory that Palin used a term most familiar to Jewish historians who focus on European anti-Semitism to send some sort of coded signal to evangelical Christians....
    The Left is totally unhinged.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BobinVa. Show BobinVa's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    Palin used the same term that was in the Wall Street Journal 2 days previous, and had been used by many commentators. 
    It is reasonable to say she shouldnt have used the term;  
    It is rational to say she need not have responded in this manner to the Ghoul left's vile attacks on her (that is my belief );
    however, it is irrational to claim she was using a hidden code to fire up Christian  conservatives...Of course,  you think it was a hidden code to Christian conservatives....
    It is tough to have rational discourse with irrational deranged leftists.
    You despise Palin, so anything she may say (or not say) is subjected to irrational vituperation.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    " Come on.  Cough up your proof for TEA party terrorist or Palin inciting violence.  come on.  do it." OK.  Palin using the term "blood libel" as a defense. What's your answer?

    Posted by Ergoetal


    That is inciting violence how?  Read Alan Derhsiwitz on this.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Come on Reuben! Anyone against illegal immigration is racist. Anyone against gay marriage is a homophobe. Anyone against race quotas is racist. That is the Democrat playbook for the last 40+ years! Who wrote this... And more importantly, WHO FOLLOWS THIS?! Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
    Posted by brat13


    Your "Democratic playbook" is invented by yourself to foster your own black and white view of politics.  Besides a few random zealots, no Democrat says "all" people in opposition are any of these things. 

    I am not sure who said your quote. But it does not appear to advocate violence: no one has died from personalized criticism and ridicule.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : What irresponsible rhetoric?  You need to cite examples that are clear and convincing.  I'll make it easy.  Look for comments like "I want you to get in their face". But, you won't find it, because your charges are baseless.  Your attack is unwarranted and irresponsible.  Why don't you step back from the rhetoric, and consider your approach.
    Posted by skeeter20


    My rhetoric is fine since it does not include any violent imagery.  Why are you against civility?
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    So...your point is that it's OK for Palin to say it because others have, too? Aren't you a little curious why she used that term?
    Posted by Ergoetal


    Seems like her use of that term fits.  she is being blamed erroneously for something she did not do.  Maybe I don't understand the term?
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : My rhetoric is fine since it does not include any violent imagery.  Why are you against civility?
    Posted by Reubenhop



    A few Points:

    Your rhetoric is ill founded and bad intentioned, not violent.  I am still looking for you to back up your claim that Palin is using violent imagery irrespponsibly in a way that caused the Arizona attack.

    The left has trumped up this new standard in political discourse -violent imagery.  what's next?  You can't use all caps?  how about no reference at all to the military, because they carry guns?  What's next?

    the left has been caught in a lie and deception here of trying to frame the right for murder.  You and other lefties continue to shift, claiming umbrage in new and increasingly confusing ways.  Face it, you and Mathews, Olberman, the Sheriff, are all wrong and mean spirited.  Hey, wasn't mean-spirited a charge during the election?  that the right are all mean-spirited? 

    Give it up.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : A few Points: Your rhetoric is ill founded and bad intentioned, not violent.  I am still looking for you to back up your claim that Palin is using violent imagery irrespponsibly in a way that caused the Arizona attack. The left has trumped up this new standard in political discourse -violent imagery.  what's next?  You can't use all caps?  how about no reference at all to the military, because they carry guns?  What's next? the left has been caught in a lie and deception here of trying to frame the right for murder.  You and other lefties continue to shift, claiming umbrage in new and increasingly confusing ways.  Face it, you and Mathews, Olberman, the Sheriff, are all wrong and mean spirited.  Hey, wasn't mean-spirited a charge during the election?  that the right are all mean-spirited?  Give it up.
    Posted by skeeter20


    You are not big on understanding nuance.  I will clarify.  There is no direct correlation between Palin's ill advised use of violent imagery and the attack in Arizona.  However, she has actively contributed to an increasingly toxic political atmosphere that could shape violent actions of deranged individuals and certainly has no benefit in understanding our very real national issues.  Is it so wrong to demand moral behavior from our political leaders?  Is that a "blood libel"?  And how is a demand for basic civility in any way being "mean-spirited"?  It is quite the reverse actually.
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from shumirules. Show shumirules's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    I have to love how with still zero proof that this guy ever listened to anything on talk radio or anything Palin said, the far left wingnuts still believe it must be so.

    The left is funny remember how evil GITMO and the Patriot Act used to be?

    Funny how little the left cares about either now.

    Remember how great Obama was in 06 for voting against raising the debt ceiling?  Now if a GOPer votes to not raise it they are trying to ruin America, strange.

    Remember threats to kill Bush were fine on the left, but now just disagreeing with the president is at the very least racist

    Bush face painted to look like the Joker to the left funny, Obama painted to look like the Joker?  You guessed it racist.

    The Daily Kos and the DNC put targets and bullseye's over distracts, not a problem.  Palin does it, she is telling people to kill!
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    I have to love how with still zero proof that this guy ever listened to anything on talk radio or anything Palin said, the far left wingnuts still believe it must be so. The left is funny remember how evil GITMO and the Patriot Act used to be? Funny how little the left cares about either now. Remember how great Obama was in 06 for voting against raising the debt ceiling?  Now if a GOPer votes to not raise it they are trying to ruin America, strange. Remember threats to kill Bush were fine on the left, but now just disagreeing with the president is at the very least racist Bush face painted to look like the Joker to the left funny, Obama painted to look like the Joker?  You guessed it racist. The Daily Kos and the DNC put targets and bullseye's over distracts, not a problem.  Palin does it, she is telling people to kill!
    Posted by shumirules


    You overgeneralize. 
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    "Seems like her use of that term fits.  she is being blamed erroneously for something she did not do.  Maybe I don't understand the term?" Yeah, it fits perfectly.  She's chosen an elegant way to absolve herself from responsibility.  I'd expect nothing less.  To hell with a few million Jews.
    Posted by Ergoetal


    Well, I 'm going to drop the blood libel discussion because you aregrasping at it in error, I think.   However, I am in curious exactly what you think Palin is responsible for.  The shooting?
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Your "Democratic playbook" is invented by yourself to foster your own black and white view of politics.  Besides a few random zealots, no Democrat says "all" people in opposition are any of these things.  I am not sure who said your quote. But it does not appear to advocate violence: no one has died from personalized criticism and ridicule.
    Posted by Reubenhop

    Don't confuse it with the "no one said all" BS. That has ALWAYS been implied! Look at Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton etc. If you are against their racist BS you MUST be a racist and that has been the Dem. playbook for most of my life!

    It was Matty's and Rham Emanuel's favorite Saul Alinsky. He was the origin of Rahm's favorite saying "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    I have to love how with still zero proof that this guy ever listened to anything on talk radio or anything Palin said, the far left wingnuts still believe it must be so. The left is funny remember how evil GITMO and the Patriot Act used to be? Funny how little the left cares about either now. Remember how great Obama was in 06 for voting against raising the debt ceiling?  Now if a GOPer votes to not raise it they are trying to ruin America, strange. Remember threats to kill Bush were fine on the left, but now just disagreeing with the president is at the very least racist Bush face painted to look like the Joker to the left funny, Obama painted to look like the Joker?  You guessed it racist. The Daily Kos and the DNC put targets and bullseye's over distracts, not a problem.  Palin does it, she is telling people to kill!
    Posted by shumirules

    Most STILL believe she said she could see Russia from her front porch! Carville was right... Repeat a lie enough and it becomes fact!
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists : Um, you've gone from the Tea Party Terrorists to Gitmo and the Patriot Act. And when did anyone on the left ever threaten President Bunnypants Bush? LOL. Face it, Crosshairs Sarah is bringing down the GOP. Deal with it.
    Posted by AlleyCatBruin

    Alley pull your head out of the sand! The left called for Bush's death (hanging, beheading etc.) for 8 years!
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatIsItNow. Show WhatIsItNow's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists


    A few Points:

    Your rhetoric is ill founded and bad intentioned, not violent.
    Posted by skeeter20


    Good argument. Compelling.  You are definitely not projecting. 

    [sarcasm]
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatIsItNow. Show WhatIsItNow's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists


    The left called for Bush's death (hanging, beheading etc.) for 8 years!
    Posted by brat13


    "The left"?  You mean a few stoned college kids?

    Frankly, I think most people were merely hoping he'd eat more pretzels.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from brat13. Show brat13's posts

    Re: The Tea Party Terrorists

    In Response to Re: The Tea Party Terrorists:
    "The left"?  You mean a few stoned college kids? Frankly, I think most people were merely hoping he'd eat more pretzels.
    Posted by WhatIsItNow

    Right only kids...

    Maher: You could have went to New Hampshire and killed two birds with one stone.

    Kerry: Or, I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.

     


     
Sections
Shortcuts