Re: Benghazi; 60 minutes gets more answers!
posted at 10/29/2013 11:57 AM EDT
THE lead bad guy SAYS the attack WAS because of the video.
ALQEIDA bad guy said "yea, it wasnt us it was a video" Of course you believe that.
How is "Of course you believe that" a response? You're just shooting the messenger because you cannot explain why the Al Queda bad guy would say "yes, I did it, because of the video" if the video wasn't reason.
Can you please prove you have even the tiniest shred of honor and actually respond to THAT?
Why would he lie? Terrorists love to claim responsibility and give their reasons. It's their MO, for chrissake. What is so hard about that for you? That it defeats your anti-Obama narrative?
all ground intelligence then and since, and the President of Libya at the time said it was a orchestrated attack by alqeida and had nothing to do with a video! Of course You dismiss that.
I don't dismiss it. Stop lying.
What I I did was point to (1) intelligence that an attack told a bystander that it was because of the video, and (2) the lead orchestator said it was because of the video?
Is your position that it "attack by Al Queda" and "attack because of video" are mutually exclusive? It literally cannot be both?
Is your position that the it is impossible that the lead orchestrator did it because of the video, but other al queda tag-alongs did it because they just plain hate us?
Why can you not face the facts?
Obama DID call it an "act of terror" the day after.
Then for 5 days after that ^^^^ he and his staff ran the "it was a protest gone wrong over a video" into the ground including an embarassing display of cowardise in front of the UN!
Why do you dismiss the fact that the guy who orchestrated the attack said it WAS because of the video?
Why do you think it is unreasonable to blame the video if there were 19 large protests in other places because of the video?
You CANNOT show that the line of blame traces all the way back to Obama.
You wouldnt accept it if, he admitted it himself.
Again, you shoot them messenger because you cannot respond to the fact that "You CANNOT show that the line of blame traces all the way back to Obama."
Thank you for proving yet again that you are a hyperpartisan idealogue. All you can do is repeat things your conservative propoganda tells you. When someone responds with real points of their own, you have no answer. Instead of admitting you were wrong or saying you don't know, you just shoot the messenger.
Now THAT is what a "tool" looks like.