Canadian Healthcare for individuals

  • Edit/rename discussion
  • Make sticky
  • Archive discussion
  • Move discussion
  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    The Canadian study concluded:

    o As many as 24,000 patients die each year due to "adverse events" (doctors code words for a medical mistake).

    o 87,500 patients admitted annually to Canadian acute care hospitals experience an adverse event.

    o 1 in 13 adult patients admitted to a Canadian hospital encounter an adverse event.

    o 1 in 19 adults will potentially be given the wrong medication or wrong medication dosage.

    o 37% of adverse events are "highly" preventable.

    o 24% of preventable adverse events are related to medication error.

    A report by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) indicated that nearly one quarter of Canadian adults (5.2 million people) reported that they, or a member of their family, had experienced a "preventable adverse event" (medical error).

    Are Canadian Medical Malpractice Claims Different Than in the U. S.?

    In a word; yes.

    Lot's of people have read about large jury awards for personal injury claims in the United States. Sometimes the American jury awards seem to be out of proportion to the injury.

    In Canada, court awards are much lower than awards for similar injuries from courts in the United States. Cases that might be successful in the U.S. are simply not economically feasible to pursue in Canada.

    For example, the province of Nova Scotia also has some of the most conservative (lowest) awards in Canada for compensation for personal injury claims.

    Role of the C.M.P.A.:

    In Canada, most doctors are defended by a single organization, the Canadian Medical Protection Association (the C.M.P.A.).

    According to a recent annual report, the C.M.P.A. has two point nine (2.9) BILLION DOLLARS in assets (money in the bank). The C.M.P.A. is able to use this money to hire the best experts and lawyers money can buy.

    Many victims of serious medical errors cannot work, or have huge expenses for ongoing rehabilitation or medical care.

    Against such overwhelming financial odds, Canadian victims of medical malpractice face an almost insurmountable challenge to obtain justice and fair compensation for their injuries.

    Remember the Canadian Medical Association Journal study that determined that over 87,000 patients in Canada suffer an adverse event and as many as 24,000 people die each year due to medical errors? That's more than 100,000 potential malpractice claims in Canada every year!

    But between 2002 and 2006 the C.M.P.A. reports only 5246 lawsuits were filed against doctors in Canada: only about a 1000 claims per year.

    In other words, out of 100,000 potential claims 99% of potential medical malpractice victims never even filed a claim!

    The C.M.P.A. reports it's success rate in defending claims brought against doctors. More than 3800 of the 5000 claims were dismissed or abandoned because the victim or his or her family quit or ran out of money, or died before trial.

    Some Frightening Statistics:

    o The C.M.P.A. settled only 229 claims out of court (usually after several years of litigation and just before trial).

    o Of the 577 cases that went to trial only 121 resulted in a verdict for the Plaintiff victim. In other words, only twenty percent (20%) of medical malpractice plaintiffs actually won their trial.

    o For the few victims who won at trial, the median damage award was only $95,500.00.

    o In 2006 the C.M.P.A. spent 72 million dollars on legal fees to defend doctors across Canada.

    o Of more than 5000 lawsuits filed against doctors, only two percent (2%) resulted in trial verdicts for the victim.

    In other words, 98% of Canadian medical malpractice victims never receive a penny in compensation!

    The odds against medical malpractice victims are almost overwhelming. If you think you or a family member has suffered an injury or loss as a result of medical malpractice it is critical to get proper advice. An experienced medical malpractice lawyer can tell you if you have a potential claim and can advise you what you need to prove to have the best chance of winning your case.

    John McKiggan is a medical malpractice lawyer from Halifax, Nova Scotia and a founding partner in the law firm Arnold Pizzo McKiggan. Mr. McKiggan has been representing victims of medical malpractice for 18 years.



    Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/1192041

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatDoYouWantNow. Show WhatDoYouWantNow's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    Do you know how many medical errors occur in American Hospitals? Something like 100,000/year.

    And people think med. mal. suits are "frivolous"...  

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    Do you know how many medical errors occur in American Hospitals? Something like 100,000/year.

    And people think med. mal. suits are "frivolous"...  



    Canada less than 35 million people

    USA more than 300 million people

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    Canada has a subpar govt run healthcare system. It doesnt mean our will be to with more govt involvement; it just means govt run HC can suck and may not be the savior that some act like it is!

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    Your post is meaningless unless you are prepared to post the same numbers with regards to the US.

    Either way..it's difficult to overcome the US' low ranking among industrialized nations. No doubt our quality and research is near the top...but without access it is meaningless.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    Canada has a subpar govt run healthcare system. 



    Both U.S. and Canadian systems are well above par.  That should not be mistaken.

    The question is which is superior, and a plurality of sources favor the latter in most categories.

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to MattyScornD's comment:

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    Canada has a subpar govt run healthcare system. 

    Both U.S. and Canadian systems are well above par.  That should not be mistaken.

    The question is which is superior, and a plurality of sources favor the latter in most categories. 



    Im not comparing with any one else. Im saying if, you have this high level of malpractice issues you have a subpar system!

    The real point is to have private industry or govt run it.

    With private industry at least you have someone to hold accountible and other options when they f-up.

    Govt run HC may be cheaper by the avg individual cost but, at what level sacrifice to service and health?

     

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    In response to MattyScornD's comment:

     

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    Canada has a subpar govt run healthcare system. 

    Both U.S. and Canadian systems are well above par.  That should not be mistaken.

    The question is which is superior, and a plurality of sources favor the latter in most categories. 

     



    Im not comparing with any one else. Im saying if, you have this high level of malpractice issues you have a subpar system!


    You're comparing to "par".  As in, an average of what other countries are doing.  BY that average, Canada's is well above par.  This is well established.

     

     

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatDoYouWantNow. Show WhatDoYouWantNow's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    Too many Fox graphics have destroyed his ability to conduct proper analysis.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to WhichOnesPink2's comment:

    How many don't have access to health care in this country?


    i.e., how many people can afford it.

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatDoYouWantNow. Show WhatDoYouWantNow's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to tvoter's comment:

     




     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    In response to miscricket's comment:

     

    Your post is meaningless unless you are prepared to post the same numbers with regards to the US.

    Either way..it's difficult to overcome the US' low ranking among industrialized nations. No doubt our quality and research is near the top...but without access it is meaningless.

     



    If you rank healthcare systems by criteria they have no control over, then yes the US ranks pretty low. But why would you rank a healthcare system by criteria they have no control over like deaths by accidents, murders, suicides, drug overdoses, obeisity, etc? You would if you have an agenda.

     




    Access is a valid criteria. You can have the best healthcare in the world in terms of quality...but if a significant amount of your citizens can't access it because of lack of affordability..then it is essentially meaningless. You may have great health care...but a healthcare system..not so much.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from WhatDoYouWantNow. Show WhatDoYouWantNow's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to miscricket's comment:

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    In response to miscricket's comment:

    Your post is meaningless unless you are prepared to post the same numbers with regards to the US.

    Either way..it's difficult to overcome the US' low ranking among industrialized nations. No doubt our quality and research is near the top...but without access it is meaningless.

    If you rank healthcare systems by criteria they have no control over, then yes the US ranks pretty low. But why would you rank a healthcare system by criteria they have no control over like deaths by accidents, murders, suicides, drug overdoses, obeisity, etc? You would if you have an agenda.


    Access is a valid criteria. You can have the best healthcare in the world in terms of quality...but if a significant amount of your citizens can't access it because of lack of affordability..then it is essentially meaningless. You may have great health care...but a healthcare system..not so much.




    Ah, but perhaps you mistake the conservative mindset on this one:They can afford the care, so they want it to be the best possible. If that means that a large percentage of the country cannot afford care, well, it's not their job to worry about those people.

     

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Canadian Healthcare for individuals

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    In response to miscricket's comment:

     

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    In response to miscricket's comment:

    Your post is meaningless unless you are prepared to post the same numbers with regards to the US.

    Either way..it's difficult to overcome the US' low ranking among industrialized nations. No doubt our quality and research is near the top...but without access it is meaningless.

    If you rank healthcare systems by criteria they have no control over, then yes the US ranks pretty low. But why would you rank a healthcare system by criteria they have no control over like deaths by accidents, murders, suicides, drug overdoses, obeisity, etc? You would if you have an agenda.


    Access is a valid criteria. You can have the best healthcare in the world in terms of quality...but if a significant amount of your citizens can't access it because of lack of affordability..then it is essentially meaningless. You may have great health care...but a healthcare system..not so much.

     




     

    Ah, but perhaps you mistake the conservative mindset on this one:They can afford the care, so they want it to be the best possible. If that means that a large percentage of the country cannot afford care, well, it's not their job to worry about those people.

     




    Ha...good point. There is definitely a "head in the sand" mentality whenever it is mentioned that many people can't afford health care in this country. 

    Another play in the book is where they like to say that people flock to the US for healthcare. Not true. Wealthy people may come here for elective surgeries...and the very poor who come here through grants..but they also go to other countries as well. I doubt you'd see anyone from Canada flocking to US pharmacies to fill prescriptions...or people from Germany flocking to the US for elective surgery.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     

LOG IN TO COMMENT

Already registered? Just log in:
E-mail:
Password:

Forgot your password?

Please note, if you've previously registered with Facebook on Boston.com, for security reasons, you will be required to create a Boston.com password to access the area of the site. Please click here to create your password.
Not registered? Signing up is easy:
Please take a minute to register. After you register and pick a screen name, you can publish your comments everywhere on the site. Posting Policy .