Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    Newsflash spanky, if someone makes a 'promise' and then refuses to provide any details when asked, even with publically available data contradicting it, then it ain't just a promise anymore, it's intentional deception....it's a lie.

    --------------

     

    "If you make less than $250,000.00 your taxes will not go up one single dime".

     

    God this is easy.

    Yet not the issue.  The leader of the Senate lied about a presidential candidate he doesn't like, on the floor of the senate, for whom it is completely irrelevant, and illegal, lest you forgot about that little Seperation of Powers thing.

    Or if you have even heard of it.

     

    My money is on the later being a nay.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 12-Angry-Men. Show 12-Angry-Men's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    Newsflash spanky, if someone makes a 'promise' and then refuses to provide any details when asked, even with publically available data contradicting it, then it ain't just a promise anymore, it's intentional deception....it's a lie. "If you make less than $250,000.00 your taxes will not go up one single dime". God this is easy. Yet not the issue.  The leader of the Senate lied about a presidential candidate he doesn't like, on the floor of the senate, for whom it is completely irrelevant, and illegal, lest you forgot about that little Seperation of Powers thing. Or if you have even heard of it. My money is on the later being a nay.




    What the FVCK are you babbling on about?

     

    Wow, seperation of powers? Seriously?

    Politicians from both sides of the aisle take to the floor of their respective chambers and make political statements on either the sitting prez or candidates. The seperation idea has absolutely nothing to do with politicians voicing their opinions, either in the Congress or not.

    Does the "You lie." outburst ring a bell?

    Gawd, that is just ridiculous.

     

    So let me get this straight....

    Mittens says he won't raise taxes and you believe him. No need for pesky details or facts, you have 'faith'. Mittens refuses to provide even basic details when asked and you defend it.

    Numerous independent economists and fact checkers have shown it is impossible yet you keep your nose firmly stuck between Mittens cheeks.

     

    Reid makes a comment, similiarly without facts and you go beserk and call him a liar.

    Ya, nice to see the fallback, double standard position in action.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    Newsflash spanky, if someone makes a 'promise' and then refuses to provide any details when asked, even with publically available data contradicting it, then it ain't just a promise anymore, it's intentional deception....it's a lie. "If you make less than $250,000.00 your taxes will not go up one single dime". God this is easy. Yet not the issue.  The leader of the Senate lied about a presidential candidate he doesn't like, on the floor of the senate, for whom it is completely irrelevant, and illegal, lest you forgot about that little Seperation of Powers thing. Or if you have even heard of it. My money is on the later being a nay.




    What the FVCK are you babbling on about?

     

    Wow, seperation of powers? Seriously?

    Politicians from both sides of the aisle take to the floor of their respective chambers and make political statements on either the sitting prez or candidates. The seperation idea has absolutely nothing to do with politicians voicing their opinions, either in the Congress or not.

    Does the "You lie." outburst ring a bell?

    Gawd, that is just ridiculous.

     

    So let me get this straight....

    Mittens says he won't raise taxes and you believe him. No need for pesky details or facts, you have 'faith'. Mittens refuses to provide even basic details when asked and you defend it.

    Numerous independent economists and fact checkers have shown it is impossible yet you keep your nose firmly stuck between Mittens cheeks.

     

    Reid makes a comment, similiarly without facts and you go beserk and call him a liar.

    Ya, nice to see the fallback, double standard position in action.




    Night rambo

     



    R 49% O 47%

    University of Colorado: Updated election forecasting model still points to Romney win...

    PAPER: Why Obama's campaign is falling apart...

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    Newsflash spanky, if someone makes a 'promise' and then refuses to provide any details when asked, even with publically available data contradicting it, then it ain't just a promise anymore, it's intentional deception....it's a lie.

    --------------

     

    "If you make less than $250,000.00 your taxes will not go up one single dime".

     

    God this is easy.

    Yet not the issue.  The leader of the Senate lied about a presidential candidate he doesn't like, on the floor of the senate, for whom it is completely irrelevant, and illegal, lest you forgot about that little Seperation of Powers thing.

    Or if you have even heard of it.

     

    My money is on the later being a nay.




    Smart money

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from newman09. Show newman09's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    I think most know my vote around here, but if Obama does get re-elected they need to remove Reid and Pelosi from their positions, they are the worst of the Democratic Party. Even a lot of Dems don't like working with them.

    I find them both to be the MOST partisan politicians I can think of. If things are ever going change in Washington, you need to get rid of these two baffoons.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    Pelosi lost her position and Reid will next month.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from newman09. Show newman09's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    Pelosi lost her position and Reid will next month.




    Still the minority leader...can't be fast enough!

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    Minority is the magic word.  Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.  No gavel.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from 12-Angry-Men. Show 12-Angry-Men's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    "If you make less than $250,000.00 your taxes will not go up one single dime". God this is easy.Yet not the issue.  The leader of the Senate lied about a presidential candidate he doesn't like, on the floor of the senate, for whom it is completely irrelevant, and illegal, lest you forgot about that little Seperation of Powers thing.Or if you have even heard of it.My money is on the later being a nay.




     

    Oh gawd you're an idiot.

     

    Hey numbnuts, how the freak can this be a 'seperation' issue when Mittens ain't even got a job, much less a job in the Executive Branch.

     

    Seriously dude, just shut up.

    You're making ridiculously stupid rants and just wasting pixels.

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    Hey numbnuts, how the freak can this be a 'seperation' issue when Mittens ain't even got a job, much less a job in the Executive Branch.

    --------------------------------------------

    Yes, a presdential election has nothing to do with the executive branch, despite that pesky Aricle II of that pesky constitution thingy.

    You've pegged the Dunce-O-Meter yet again.  Gotta be a record.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from 12-Angry-Men. Show 12-Angry-Men's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

    Hey numbnuts, how the freak can this be a 'seperation' issue when Mittens ain't even got a job, much less a job in the Executive Branch. Yes, a presdential election has nothing to do with the executive branch, despite that pesky Aricle II of that pesky constitution thingy. You've pegged the Dunce-O-Meter yet again.  Gotta be a record.



    Gawd, just shut the FVCK up already.

    Newsflash numbnuts, just because you want the seperation interpretation to apply to private citizens doesn't make it so. No matter how loud your temper tantrum.

     

    Geez, this one is right up there with your black Anglo-Saxon bullshiat.

     

    It would be entertaining if it wasn't so dang pathetic.

     

    Geez, grow a fvcking spine and at least try to deal with reality.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    Romney is going to give a tax cut to the wealthy and the rest of us will have tax increase. By the way, that's known as a redistribution of income from the middle class to the wealthy.

    --------------------------------------------

    Thats what Obama says a noted Princeton economist said.

    Problem is, he said the polar opposite.  I'll go with him over you.  No offence

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreginMeffa. Show GreginMeffa's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

     

    Gawd, just shut the FVCK up already.

     

    No.

     

    You're too much fun to rile.

     

    "Private citizen".  Hilarious

     

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from 12-Angry-Men. Show 12-Angry-Men's posts

    Re: Dear liberal, admit Harry Reid lied through the wrong cheeks

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:

      Gawd, just shut the FVCK up already. No. You're too much fun to rile. "Private citizen".  Hilarious 




    So that's your motivation for the crap you post? Try and annoy me...

     

     

    Wow, you really are a sad pathetic individual.

     

    And now you're going to jump the shark and say Mittens isn't a private citizen?

     

    Wow.

     

    Yep, you're right. You're complete and utter ignorance is annoying, just as trying to reason with a three year old throwing a temper tantrum.

    Congrats, you have reached your aspiration...of a three year old. Your parents must be soooo proud.

     

    Hey numbnuts, can ya forward along a link to the oath of office Mittens took during the campaign?

    Last time I checked the office that Mittens is running for mandates an oath of office only if you win the election. But I'm sure you'll throw a hissy fit and dispute that as well.

    And no, the Grover 'No Tax' pledge doesn't count.

    Or is that too difficult?

     
Sections
Shortcuts