Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    In response to DamainAllen's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    It appears that two members of the house knew about the affair.  Eric Cantor was briefed on the situation by a whistleblower in October and he was clued into it by Rep Dave Reichert. 

    [/QUOTE]

    Only two and the President didn't know about it?  That's amazingly unlikely.  

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "Obama was trying to spin the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous attack rather than an act of terror because he felt that was the best narrative for him to win the election."


     

    Hahahahahaha. Give it up. You failed to sway the election with your stupid Benghazi lies.

     

    He's on tape calling it an "act of terror" on day one. Game over.

    [/QUOTE]

    Wrong.  He was caught on tape (60 Minutes) saying it wasn't.

    You can cling to that lie all you want. two weeks of denying it was a terrorit attack, blaming it on a video.  

    You probably still think the video was the cause of this spontaneous attack, don't you?

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from BilltheKat. Show BilltheKat's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    In response to skeeter20's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BilltheKat's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Just wingnuts searching for an impeachment wedge.

    Give it up already, you anti-american freaks.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    impeachment?  Who's talking about impeachment?

    Give it up, you Obama-worshiper.

    [/QUOTE]

    In response to Sistersledge's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     The x CIA chief should do the right thing. Put a .45 in his mouth and .............. !  

    [/QUOTE]


    Not until he TALKS.

    He is the link to Obama.

    Get the impeachment papers ready.

     

     

    Seems to me NOMO is. Duh!

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    We don't know all the facts yet, but right now it looks like the investigation was wrapping up without implicating Petraeus in breaking any law or agency rule, and without bringing his relationship public.  

    What smells fishy to me is why an FBI "whistleblower" goes directly to House Repbulicans two weeks before the election.  Either he/she was acting out of concern for the country (that the relationship compromised our national security) or he/she was trying to blackmail Petraeus.  If the former, and Eric Cantor's story about just passing the information to Directory Mueller is true, why would that satisfy the whistle-blower?  Shouldn't he/she just have gone to the press at that point?  

    I wouldn't be surprised if this story ends with Cantor behind bars.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from DamainAllen. Show DamainAllen's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    In response to skeeter20's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DamainAllen's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    It appears that two members of the house knew about the affair.  Eric Cantor was briefed on the situation by a whistleblower in October and he was clued into it by Rep Dave Reichert. 

    [/QUOTE]

    Only two and the President didn't know about it?  That's amazingly unlikely.  

    [/QUOTE]


    No it isn't "unlikely" and one of the reasons is because Cantor decided not to inform the House Intelligence committee nor anyone else for that matter upon finding out about the affair.  Cantor staffers said they didn't immediately tell the House Intelligence Committee or chamber leaders because they didn't know whether the tip was credible. 


     

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Just waiting for the FACTS my friend.

    Your messiah will sit on them as long as possible.

    WHY does Obama hide the Libya information 2 months after the TERROR ATTACK.. unless you subscribe to the "video" theory published by this administration. You can't possibly be THAT gullible but you may be that politically tilted.

     

    Geepers.. are you using public computers and taxpayer time to publish this dribble again?

     

    [/QUOTE]


    You are the nitwit calling for impeachment.  Now you are just "waiting on the facts".  You are a vapid little blowhard.  You got hate, but nothing else.

    And it is a holiday duckhead.  A holiday.  Do you have a job to know the difference?

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Did the Obama Administration comprimise its own CIA chief?

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Just waiting for the FACTS my friend.

    Your messiah will sit on them as long as possible.

    WHY does Obama hide the Libya information 2 months after the TERROR ATTACK.. unless you subscribe to the "video" theory published by this administration. You can't possibly be THAT gullible but you may be that politically tilted.

     

    Geepers.. are you using public computers and taxpayer time to publish this dribble again?

     

    [/QUOTE]


    You are the nitwit calling for impeachment.  Now you are just "waiting on the facts".  You are a vapid little blowhard.  You got hate, but nothing else.

    And it is a holiday duckhead.  A holiday.  Do you have a job to know the difference?

    [/QUOTE]

    A holiday for who?

    Taxpayers need to work.

    Taxtakers take a holiday.

     

Share