Re: In one year alone, 2011....
posted at 12/20/2012 8:49 AM EST
In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:
In response to NO MO O's comment:
Please try to stop generalize all this or that. WE (just as YOU) don't ALL share the same opinion. Make training the teachers option and offer a pay differencial for "packing" the heat. Submit all around awareness is the best defense. State or local control works for me.
Now that's fvcking rich.
All you whacko wingnuts keep blabbering, over and over again is more guns, more guns all without one shred of evidence that it would do anything but exacerbate the situation.
I'll stop generalizing when you fvcking idiots actually apply a modicum of logic and a scintilla of evidence to all your ideological ignorance.
In the 18 yrs before Australia passed an assault weapons ban there were 13 mass murders and 102 deaths, almost one such incident a year.
In the fifeteen yrs since the new gun laws... NOT ONE INCIDENT IN THAT CATEGORY.
So if you can't provide the same compelling evidence then just shut the fcuk up.
All you idiots do is regurgitate the same diarhea based on nothing more than your ideological ignorance. You freakin morons are so fvcking dense that even when shown the most relevent and compelling evidence to date, you stick your fvcking heads further up your rectums and just keep parroting the same echo chamber bullshiite.
So no, yours it not an opinion worth anything more than derision and scorn.
If the best argument you have is to ignore the facts, parrot wingnut memes and stick your noses between the cheeks of the lemming in front of you, then you have no cause to complain about being ridiculed.
It's mind-numbingly annoying when there is case after case, study after study which shows direct evidence that banning assualt weapons and tightening gun laws reduces these mass killings and the best bullshiite response from the wingnuts is to stamp their feet, plug their ears and regurgitate echo chamber tripe. You can't dispute the evidence and you have, at best fleeting, tangental studies about general crime, and even those are outdated and don't even apply to mass murders yet you refuse to believe hard evidence only because it's conflicts with your ideology. You have no facts, no evidence, just some fvcking cockamamie idea that by putting more of the same weapons that were used in this heinous act into circulation it would reduce the types of murders those weapons were designed for.
IT"S ABSOLUTELY FVCKING LUDICROUS!!!
You're ideological imbeciles and insist, inspite of all the relevent facts to the contrary, on arguing your 'point' like obstinate three year olds who still believe in the Tooth Fairy.
Do you have a source for the Austrailia study and the paramaters of their assault weapon legislation?