This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

This post has been removed.

In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:

Yeah like Romney's fight with some kid 45 years ago or his income tax returns, or how he murdered one of his employees, or if his wife works.

Or Bain. Too funny.

The man in the market must have been in Denver recently where the air is thin so he couldn't be taken seriously.

 

Now that's fkn Hilarious! 

In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:

You don't think a business telling Obama that his business has been suffering since Obama took office is NOT an issue?

You are further gone than I thought.

In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:

You don't think a business telling Obama that his business has been suffering since Obama took office is NOT an issue?

You are further gone than I thought.

It sounds like the guy was hoping the Obama visit alone would bring people in to buy his meats.

Maybe he had horrible looking meat that day.

Maybe people were busy trying to shake hands with Obama and were too distracted to think about buying meat.

It's easy to blame others when your business isn't performing as well as you'd like. But most times when your business is suffering the owner should take most of the blame.

In response to ZILLAGOD's comment:

"It's easy to blame others"

BINGO!!!!

You just stumbled into Obama's big issue.  Nothing is his fault, ever.  Not the economy, not Libya, not this guys business.

So, the question is, if nothing is his problem, and he can't do anything about it, why do we need Obama?

In response to skeeter20's comment:

The flip side of that argument is that conservatives give Obama no credit for anything.  Unemployment is low but the stock market and private sector job growth is nearly as strong as during the height of the real estate bubble - an artificial economy.  Can you praise or fault one, while ignoring the other?

The attack in Benghazi is unfortunate, and maybe preventable, but speaking of Libya in general, we toppled a dictator by "leading from behind" which resulted in .1% the cost in American lives and dollars as Iraq.  Maybe that deserves some credit?

This guy's business is a failure, so it's Obama's fault.  But if it had been successful, "he built that" all by himself.

 

In response to slomag's comment:

Bengazi:  Bush had a containment strategy that worked.  It unravelled under Obama, now we have al queda in charge of Libya.  I call that a failure for U.S. interests.

Failure:  Obama claims he controls everything, from stopping the sea level from rising, to solving the employment problem of a breathless student ( "oh, thank you Obama for taking time out of your day to talk to us. Oh! precious God!", in this case, clearly the student thinks that Obama is God).  So, when it is convenient, Obama is responsible, when it is not, someone else is.

Somewhere in the last four years, all this, this big mess, ceased to be Bush's fault, and it became Obama's problem.  Tell me, when?  In your mind, never.

Stock market, other positive indicators:  these reflect future value, which includes the inflation that the government undereports constantly.  Real inflation, not the phony  basket that eliminates food and fuel, is near 10%.  This is a larger driver in the current valuations as a whole, than anything else.  Or, it is a bubble.  You pick.  There is no economic growth driving the current valuations, not at 1% GDP per year.

In response to ZILLAGOD's comment:

Good point, it is easy to blame others... like Bush

This post has been removed.

In response to msobstinate99's comment:

Good story

This post has been removed.