Newtster posts about police officers having to shoot a man dead because he took a gun from one of them and started shooting.
SB references a single event in which an off duty police officer, trained to use a gun tos top crime, uses a gun to stop crime.
From this we are to conclude....what exactly....?
That more guns is necessarily better?
That AR-15s - a gun not involved in either event - should be available to citizenry despite being completely unnecessary for self defense?
Or are we just throwing up single data points and hoping someone else draws a conclusion?