New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

    NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf" target="_blank">Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

    Do not question the science!


     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BobinVa. Show BobinVa's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    Moonbat response pending :
    "....But, besides a scientific journal,  it was also reported on Fox News, so you cant believe it!"
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from RevWright. Show RevWright's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    Al Gores total net worth just dropped tens of millions but don't worry.. Obama will ramrod through tree hugging initiatives.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from massmoderateJoe. Show massmoderateJoe's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    This contrarian thought must emanate from some Tea party psuedo-scientist as it most likely could be real true because it violates the Democratic conventional wisdom model of global climate change.

    There's an awful lot we don't understand about the earth's ecosystem and its way to adapt, which is why we should use a lot of caution before heading down a path cap and tax on carbon releases. 
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    I don't know what the Earth thinks it's doing.  doesn't it know the science is settled?
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    This contrarian thought must emanate from some Tea party psuedo-scientist as it most likely could be real true because it violates the Democratic conventional wisdom model of global climate change.

    He's clearly a heretic and should be burned at the stake at the first opportunity.


     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from RevWright. Show RevWright's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    Rueben?... jump in anytime and refure please.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from RevWright. Show RevWright's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    The underlying theories of how warming works have not been disproven...

    OR PROVEN.
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    "alarmist" = writerly bias

    CO2 isn't the only man-induced pollutant affecting the climate, hence the plural: greenhouse gasses.

    Atmospheric heat loss (much less within only ten years) is but a single data point out of many applicable to climate science.

    Anyone who uses a single study or model to make their case knows less than nothing about the scientific method.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    In Response to Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism:
    Having fun with the shadowboxing party, righties? You sound like Beavis & Butthead snickering about how math is stupid. This is an example of science. Data shows problems with models. Change models. You aren't suggesting that for a science to be trusted, all predictions must always be 100% accurate, are you? Again, this gets to how much and at what rate man's actions cause warming. The underlying theories of how warming works have not been disproven. Even if you section off 1998-2008 and note that those particular years did not show the warming trend of a larger number years around them.
    Posted by WhatDoYouWantNow


    Faking the data to make the model appear to work is the Democratic way!
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    In Response to Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism:
    "alarmist" = writerly bias CO2 isn't the only man-induced pollutant affecting the climate, hence the plural: greenhouse gas ses. Atmospheric heat loss (much less within only ten years) is but a single data point out of many applicable to climate science. Anyone who uses a single study or model to make their case knows less than nothing about the scientific method.
    Posted by MattyScornD



    This counts as thre highly touted global warming models to fall victim to"selective data".
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from DamainAllen. Show DamainAllen's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    Comforting, that we aren't rapidly hurtling towards oblivion, even moreso that this information was vetted and provided by NASA. 
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    In Response to Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism:
    In Response to Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism : This counts as thre highly touted global warming models to fall victim to"selective data".
    Posted by skeeter20


    and likely won't be the last either.

    It works both ways, y'know.
     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from whatnow4. Show whatnow4's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    It is as if we learned nothing from the Ozone layer fiasco.

    We were supposed to be living underground by now with skin cancers in the 60-70%'s.

    Why do people latch on to something and refuse to give it up?  On both sides.

    And I am still waiting for someone to prove that MAN MADE global warming exists.

    Has anyone noticed that the left has abandoned that approach?  Now it is just that global warming exists.  It is the same tactic used with immigration.  The debate isn't about illegal immigration, just immigration.

    Now we are just talking about global warming, not man made global warming.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from whatnow4. Show whatnow4's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    Matty-

    greenhouse gases. . . .do you know what is the biggest offender?. . . .water vapor.

    Maybe we should reduce that as well.  You know to save the planet and all.  Maybe we should tax it as well. 
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    This is an example of science. Data shows problems with models. Change models. 

    We agree and that's what we've been saying all along. What these alleged scientists have been doing is altering the data to fit the model instead of tossing the model and coming up with a new theory. If it were only a question of doing good science what they've done would be bad enough. The problem is that governmant and super-government agencies have based truly bad public policy on what amounts to scientific fraud.


    The underlying theories of how warming works have not been disproven.

    That's obviously not the point. The point is that the underlying theories have yet to be proven and it's looking more and more that they will never be. The point is not to base massive wealth transfer schemes on unproven science.


    "alarmist" = writerly bias

    Right, and I'll just bet that you've been pointing out the "writerly bias" every time that the word "denier" was used to describe a skeptic.


    CO2 isn't the only man-induced pollutant affecting the climate, hence the plural: greenhouse gasses

    No but it's proven useful as a wedge for organizations like the EPA to insert themselves via regulation into the economy.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from lawboy. Show lawboy's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    the Earth is flat
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    In Response to Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism:
    the Earth is flat
    Posted by lawboy


    The earth is round, it's your head that's flat.


     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    I was out in the sun today, and it was hot.  Am I a victim of global warming?
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from whatnow4. Show whatnow4's posts

    Re: New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

    ahhh, see they can't argue the point so they say strawman bs like the "earth is flat". 

    As if saying that man made global warming doesn't exist is akin to the earth being flat.

    Dooo sh
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share