Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    This administration has either had enormous bad luck or they are way more crooked than Nixon ever was. Nixon was paranoid and likely dillusional but, with the Benghazi mess unfolding and Petreaus scandal going into meltdown; not only will it hinder the admins ability to govern it may cause it to fall if, the evidence leads to cabinet or higher level implications in the cover up!

    Sad for all of us.

    Prices are going up and every single working citizen of the USA will have less take home pay in January once the Bush tax cuts expire and we ALL pay 150.00 to thousands a month more in payroll tax.

    Its astonishing to me that people are so careful about charities and they demand to know how much of every dollar goes the needed areas. If, it is less than 75 cents on every dollar they do not think that is a good but, some want to give more to the governement where the ratio is much less!!

    just sayin!

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from DamainAllen. Show DamainAllen's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    Um, Nixon was impeached for the crime which was willfully committed and then willfully covered up.  There is not a single shred of evidence that anything that happened in Benghazi was the result of a criminal action. 

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to DamainAllen's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Um, Nixon was impeached for the crime which was willfully committed and then willfully covered up. 

    He didnt commit the crime although knew of it. It was the cover up he was impeached for.

    There is not a single shred of evidence that anything that happened in Benghazi was the result of a criminal action.

    Yet, it's not looking good.

    btw: I do not want the President to be impeached. It's bad for the USA domestically and abroad!

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    There's this thing called "obstruction of justice".  It's when a person tries to cover up a crime.  Obstruction of justice is itself a crime.  Nixon was not involved in the Watergate Break in.  But he did architect the coverup of the crime, meaning HE COMMITTED A CRIME.

    Nixon wasn't impeached.  The Judicial committee voted to impeach, but Nixon resigned before the House voted for Impeachment.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:

    There's this thing called "obstruction of justice".  It's when a person tries to cover up a crime.  Obstruction of justice is itself a crime.  Nixon was not involved in the Watergate Break in.  But he did architect the coverup of the crime, meaning HE COMMITTED A CRIME.

    Nixon wasn't impeached.  The Judicial committee voted to impeach, but Nixon resigned before the House voted for Impeachment.

    Technically true. Thanks!

    I'm afraid this mess is just beginning. Hillary cannot dodge forever.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    Insurgents attack the consulate, killing the Ambassador and another staff member with either a rocket or mortar and somehow you think it was caused by Hillary Clinton breaking the law.

    Aren't you starting the "smear hillary so she won't get elected President" campaign a little early?

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:

    Insurgents attack the consulate, killing the Ambassador and another staff member with either a rocket or mortar and somehow you think it was caused by Hillary Clinton breaking the law.

    Aren't you starting the "smear hillary so she won't get elected President" campaign a little early?




    Terrorist attacked the consulate. I dont know what Hillary knows but, it appears she doesnt want to say on the record either to protect herself or someone else. I would bet the latter; she is too smart and experienced to screw up that bad.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to NO MO O's comment:

    [/QUOTE]
    . No worries.. he has 4 more years to apologize.




    Maybe, maybe not! Lot of bad stuff brewing through the Benghazi and Petreaus debacles!

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    [/QUOTE]



    Terrorist attacked the consulate. I dont know what Hillary knows but, it appears she doesnt want to say on the record either to protect herself or someone else. I would bet the latter; she is too smart and experienced to screw up that bad.

    [/QUOTE]


    Shhhh !! Obama doesn't like to use the "T" word in public. It might 'offend' his Muslim friends....

    They are victems and America is at fault. No worries.. he has 4 more years to apologize.

    [/QUOTE]

    He used the term "terrorism" in first public response.  The rest of what you say is baseless right wing ranting.  Do you even believe the nonsense you spew?

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:

    He used the term "terrorism" in first public response.  The rest of what you say is baseless right wing ranting.  Do you even believe the nonsense you spew?

    [/QUOTE]

    Its way past that lie too.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    What exactly is the coverup?  That Benghazi was not a spontaneous reaction to a video, but a terrorist attack?  Forget about politics - you have this transcript on record the next day ...

    No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.

    But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers.  These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity.  They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

    Fox news might buy your "he was talking in a general sense about acts of terror - he wasn't talking about Benghazi" spin, but a court of law never would - never mind 2/3 of a Senate with a 55-45 Dem majority.

     

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to slomag's comment:

    What exactly is the coverup? 



    Who knows right now.

    Could be a refusal to help the 4 killed. Could be they knew it was a coordinated terrorist attack while they were telling everyone including the UN it was over an American video.

    Could be they knew Patreaus was compromnised for weeks but, did nothing because of an election.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    Sorry conservatives - you're grasping at straws.  

    1) The rose garden speech should be the end of your youtube coverup angle.  Even if you don't want to believe it, you'll never convince a majority after looking at that transcript that Obama was trying to spin Benghazi as anything other than a terrorist attack.

    2) What possible motive could there be for refusing to help the US personnel in Benghazi?  The CIA timeline states help was on the way within 25 minutes of the first report.

    3) The FBI decided months ago that there was no action to take against Petraeus.  The fact that this story came up 10 days before the election, and was brought to House Republicans - it implicates Republicans, not the white house.  Don't be surprised if Eric Cantor is the one on the hot seat in the coming weeks.

    4) I don't know where you're getting the 7-hour firefight narrative, but remember that Stevens was brought to a local hospital by Libyan civilians, who apparently did not know who he was, 3 hours after the first attack began.

    Obama is clean as a whistle on this one. It's Eric Cantor who is looking dirtier by the second.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    Do the righties really believe that something sinister concerning Benghazi occurred within the administration or is this just a result of election withdrawals?  Maybe add in some code someplace to let us know if you are being serious or just a pain in the behind.

    Not that it matters to you guys, but I'd kind of like to know if you're petty, bored, or genuinely crazy.  I figure Skeeter is all three.  I'm pretty sure Oh No is petty and bored, but not crazy. 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to tvoter's comment:

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:

    He used the term "terrorism" in first public response.  The rest of what you say is baseless right wing ranting.  Do you even believe the nonsense you spew?



    Its way past that lie too.



    Lie?  Read the transcript Romney.  

 
  • You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    [/QUOTE]

    While you're at it, DON't respond to Obamas to cover this up.. due to obvious political vested interests. He couldn't spell "America First", no doubt a philosophy you don't hold.

    He used the term "terrorism" in first public response.  The rest of what you say is baseless right wing ranting.  Do you even believe the nonsense you spew?

    [/QUOTE]

    GREAT response !!!

    Care to continue ignoring and NOT comment on the above rather than cherry pick ?

    On the same day.. 2 faced Obama mentioned the video.

    He had his lackeys (Rice and Hillary) SPEWING the video LIE.. for WEEKS.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Cherrypicking?  No just showing what a unthinking liar you are about Obama.  The video motivation issue is not a "lie".  You cannot prove it was not a motivator to the attackers at Benghazi and you certainly cannot prove the administration knew it was not a motivator let alone before the investigation is complete.  You know this.  You just like to spew lies about Obama.  It is what you do.  Predictable.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • Sections
    Shortcuts

    Share