Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to dcr400m's comment:

    [/QUOTE]
    No matter how you filth try - this will never be as bad as Bush and his failure team did in failing to protect the United States and letting Osama Bin Laden destroy the WTC and 3000 lives - then Iraq. 

    You can say every nasty thing about the president and politicize the 4 people's deaths in Benghazi and claim every thing under the sun, it will NEVER MATCH THAT COLOSSAL F-UP IN 2001

    [/QUOTE]

    psst Bush is gone and no one cares if he screwed up as well or worse. It changes nothing in regards to mistakes by this admin

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to tvoter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to dcr400m's comment:

    [/QUOTE]
    No matter how you filth try - this will never be as bad as Bush and his failure team did in failing to protect the United States and letting Osama Bin Laden destroy the WTC and 3000 lives - then Iraq. 

    You can say every nasty thing about the president and politicize the 4 people's deaths in Benghazi and claim every thing under the sun, it will NEVER MATCH THAT COLOSSAL F-UP IN 2001

    [/QUOTE]

    psst Bush is gone and no one cares if he screwed up as well or worse. It changes nothing in regards to mistakes by this admin

    [/QUOTE]

    Well, since the thread is referencing "impeachment" it should be perfectly reasonable to bring up a far worse situation of proven ineptitude that did not rise to that political level.  If Bush walked away from his proven negligence for things he initiated (and at a much higher cost) in Iraq, then it is foolishness to talk impeachment of Obama for this much different Benghazi scenario.  But you want to forget Bush and just hate on Obama.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    According to the official, Petraeus says the stream of intelligence from multiple sources, including video at the scene, indicated the group (Ansar Al Sharia) was behind the attack.

    But separate intelligence emerged at the same time indicating the violence at the consulate was inspired by protests in Egypt over an ostensibly anti-Islam film that was privately produced in the United States. The movie, "Innocence of Muslims," portrayed the Prophet Mohammed as a womanizing buffoon.

    There were 20 intelligence reports that indicated that anger about the film may be to blame, the official said.

    The CIA eventually disproved those reports, but not before Petraeus' initial briefing to Congress the day after the attack, where he discussed who might be behind the attack and what prompted it. During that briefing, he raised Ansar al Sharia's possible connection as well as outrage about the film, the official said.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    According to the official, Petraeus says the stream of intelligence from multiple sources, including video at the scene, indicated the group (Ansar Al Sharia) was behind the attack.

    But separate intelligence emerged at the same time indicating the violence at the consulate was inspired by protests in Egypt over an ostensibly anti-Islam film that was privately produced in the United States. The movie, "Innocence of Muslims," portrayed the Prophet Mohammed as a womanizing buffoon.

    There were 20 intelligence reports that indicated that anger about the film may be to blame, the official said.

    The CIA eventually disproved those reports, but not before Petraeus' initial briefing to Congress the day after the attack, where he discussed who might be behind the attack and what prompted it. During that briefing, he raised Ansar al Sharia's possible connection as well as outrage about the film, the official said.

    [/QUOTE]

    they continued to say it for 2 weeks!

    The truth will come out

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to dcr400m's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvoter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    This administration has either had enormous bad luck or they are way more crooked than Nixon ever was. Nixon was paranoid and likely dillusional but, with the Benghazi mess unfolding and Petreaus scandal going into meltdown; not only will it hinder the admins ability to govern it may cause it to fall if, the evidence leads to cabinet or higher level implications in the cover up!

    Sad for all of us.

    Prices are going up and every single working citizen of the USA will have less take home pay in January once the Bush tax cuts expire and we ALL pay 150.00 to thousands a month more in payroll tax.

    Its astonishing to me that people are so careful about charities and they demand to know how much of every dollar goes the needed areas. If, it is less than 75 cents on every dollar they do not think that is a good but, some want to give more to the governement where the ratio is much less!!

    just sayin!

    [/QUOTE]
    No matter how you filth try - this will never be as bad as Bush and his failure team did in failing to protect the United States and letting Osama Bin Laden destroy the WTC and 3000 lives - then Iraq. 

    You can say every nasty thing about the president and politicize the 4 people's deaths in Benghazi and claim every thing under the sun, it will NEVER MATCH THAT COLOSSAL F-UP IN 2001

    [/QUOTE]


    BUSH DID IT!!!

     

    GAWD, WILL YOU GIVE THE BUSH BLAMING GAME A REST?

     

    I don't recollect Bush sending half his staff out to lie for him on 9/11.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to skeeter20's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to dcr400m's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvoter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    This administration has either had enormous bad luck or they are way more crooked than Nixon ever was. Nixon was paranoid and likely dillusional but, with the Benghazi mess unfolding and Petreaus scandal going into meltdown; not only will it hinder the admins ability to govern it may cause it to fall if, the evidence leads to cabinet or higher level implications in the cover up!

    Sad for all of us.

    Prices are going up and every single working citizen of the USA will have less take home pay in January once the Bush tax cuts expire and we ALL pay 150.00 to thousands a month more in payroll tax.

    Its astonishing to me that people are so careful about charities and they demand to know how much of every dollar goes the needed areas. If, it is less than 75 cents on every dollar they do not think that is a good but, some want to give more to the governement where the ratio is much less!!

    just sayin!

    [/QUOTE]
    No matter how you filth try - this will never be as bad as Bush and his failure team did in failing to protect the United States and letting Osama Bin Laden destroy the WTC and 3000 lives - then Iraq. 

    You can say every nasty thing about the president and politicize the 4 people's deaths in Benghazi and claim every thing under the sun, it will NEVER MATCH THAT COLOSSAL F-UP IN 2001

    [/QUOTE]


    BUSH DID IT!!!

     

    GAWD, WILL YOU GIVE THE BUSH BLAMING GAME A REST?

     

    I don't recollect Bush sending half his staff out to lie for him on 9/11.

    [/QUOTE]

    No lies here.  No proof that anyone KNEW the truth and purposely said the reverse.  Saying otherwise would be a lie.  You know there is no truth in what you are saying and yet you say the reverse.  You are lying.  In fact, you lie a lot Mr. Skeeter.  I guess to you, liberals deserve it.  Situational ethics...

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:

    [/QUOTE]

    No lies here.  No proof that anyone KNEW the truth and purposely said the reverse.  Saying otherwise would be a lie.  You know there is no truth in what you are saying and yet you say the reverse.  You are lying.  In fact, you lie a lot Mr. Skeeter.  I guess to you, liberals deserve it.  Situational ethics...

    When the facts come out; who will you blame then? will it be; anyone but, Obama?


     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to skeeter20's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to dcr400m's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvoter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    This administration has either had enormous bad luck or they are way more crooked than Nixon ever was. Nixon was paranoid and likely dillusional but, with the Benghazi mess unfolding and Petreaus scandal going into meltdown; not only will it hinder the admins ability to govern it may cause it to fall if, the evidence leads to cabinet or higher level implications in the cover up!

    Sad for all of us.

    Prices are going up and every single working citizen of the USA will have less take home pay in January once the Bush tax cuts expire and we ALL pay 150.00 to thousands a month more in payroll tax.

    Its astonishing to me that people are so careful about charities and they demand to know how much of every dollar goes the needed areas. If, it is less than 75 cents on every dollar they do not think that is a good but, some want to give more to the governement where the ratio is much less!!

    just sayin!

    [/QUOTE]
    No matter how you filth try - this will never be as bad as Bush and his failure team did in failing to protect the United States and letting Osama Bin Laden destroy the WTC and 3000 lives - then Iraq. 

    You can say every nasty thing about the president and politicize the 4 people's deaths in Benghazi and claim every thing under the sun, it will NEVER MATCH THAT COLOSSAL F-UP IN 2001

    [/QUOTE]


    BUSH DID IT!!!

     

    GAWD, WILL YOU GIVE THE BUSH BLAMING GAME A REST?

     

    I don't recollect Bush sending half his staff out to lie for him on 9/11.

    [/QUOTE]

    No lies here.  No proof that anyone KNEW the truth and purposely said the reverse.  Saying otherwise would be a lie.  You know there is no truth in what you are saying and yet you say the reverse.  You are lying.  In fact, you lie a lot Mr. Skeeter.  I guess to you, liberals deserve it.  Situational ethics...

    [/QUOTE]

    Lied about what?

    Are you seriously going to lay down the charge I am lying and not back it up?

    You racist idiot.

    And, are you saying what Rice said was the truth?  It was already known to not be the truth.  Incompetence or lying.  Two choices.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!


    Really?  McCain was born in the Canal Zone and that raised hardly an eyebrow.  Were his school records challenged?  Bush was born in the country and I don't recall anybody suggesting he didn't attend the schools he went to.  You think a few cranks (if that) can be compared to the all out assault on Obama on these issues? 

    [/QUOTE]


    Yes really.  McCain's was more than an eyebrow.  It was just stupid.

    And if you missed the questioning of Bush's grades in Yale and that daddy got him into Harvard, I just don't what to say!

    There was a whole, Bush was a C student rant, but it died when the cupcakes learned he had a higher GPA than Kerry.  Just as the whole Skull and Bones thing did, when the same frostingless ones found out Kerry was in it too.

    [/QUOTE]

    Dont forget the whole Bush never atrended his required days in the Air National Guard complete with Dan Rathers forgery!

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to tvoter's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:

    [/QUOTE]

    No lies here.  No proof that anyone KNEW the truth and purposely said the reverse.  Saying otherwise would be a lie.  You know there is no truth in what you are saying and yet you say the reverse.  You are lying.  In fact, you lie a lot Mr. Skeeter.  I guess to you, liberals deserve it.  Situational ethics...

    When the facts come out; who will you blame then? will it be; anyone but, Obama?


    [/QUOTE]

    You act like you have the "facts" already.  I prefer not to deal in rumor and conjecture particularly from sources with a political ax to grind.  But you like that ax so you make allowances.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    [/QUOTE]


    No lies here.  No proof that anyone KNEW the truth and purposely said the reverse.  Saying otherwise would be a lie.  You know there is no truth in what you are saying and yet you say the reverse.  You are lying.  In fact, you lie a lot Mr. Skeeter.  I guess to you, liberals deserve it.  Situational ethics...

    [/QUOTE]

    Lied about what?

    Are you seriously going to lay down the charge I am lying and not back it up?

    You racist idiot.

    And, are you saying what Rice said was the truth?  It was already known to not be the truth.  Incompetence or lying.  Two choices.

    [/QUOTE]

    Just throw the racism charge on every post and see if you can get people to believe the lie.  You are quite the amoral character.  Keep on lying Skeets.  But such actions wont get you into Heaven.  God has standards.  Be prepared for the hot place below.  

    And did you note now you are saying "incompetence" as a possible answer to Rice's action.  Even your tilted view allows for it not to be a LIE.  So you were in fact lying when you said she was a liar on the issue.  It could have been something else.... Your really should pay attention to what you say.  Of course it will only confuse you...

    Now run along, you are a boring little duckhead.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Yes really.  McCain's was more than an eyebrow.  It was just stupid.

    And if you missed the questioning of Bush's grades in Yale and that daddy got him into Harvard, I just don't what to say!

    There was a whole, Bush was a C student rant, but it died when the cupcakes learned he had a higher GPA than Kerry.  Just as the whole Skull and Bones thing did, when the same frostingless ones found out Kerry was in it too.

    [/QUOTE]

    Not even close as a comparison.  How many lawsuits were brought on McCain's legal status?  How many idiots believed he was unqualified as a foreigner to be president?  Same as the issue of Obama's grades.  Anyone offer $5 million to prove he earned his credentials?  Not even close.  Face it: conservatives have more crazies.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    Is that Senator McCain ?

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to GreginMeffa's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    How many lawsuits were brought on McCain's legal status?   - 2

    How many idiots believed he was unqualified as a foreigner to be president? - Lots (700,000 hits)

    Same as the issue of Obama's grades. Anyone offer $5 million to prove he earned his credentials? -  Try Larry Flynt on tax returns and his "affadavits" on Bush having paid for an abortion.

    Nothing beats the number one news agency in the world using OBVIOUS forgeries 2 weeks before an election, and standing by it even after the original was, uhm, burned (happens all the time, I'm sure) and the legions of drooling vegetables who believe its true to this day.

    And I apologize to vegetables everywhere for the insult.

    [/QUOTE]

    Your hope to prove equivalency on this matter is in fact quite hopeless.  Two McCain lawsuits vs. dozens against Obama?  700,000 hits (whatever that is) on McCain's status vs. about 50% of the G.O.P. are birthers.  And tax returns are not the same as school records. One is a legitimate ground of inquiry, the other is just plain idiocy. 

    And as we see here every day, Fox News has more than its share of 'drooling vegetables".

    The facts are you got a lot more crazies.  You just want to pretend it is all equal. But the numbers say different.  I guess you have to fool yourself to get by...

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Nixon was impeached, not for a crime but, for the cover up!

    In response to Reubenhop's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    Oh, you need BOTH to pass your filter.  sigh.  Do they need to be left handed as well? 

    Mcains birth was challenged.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103224.html

    Do I really need to go google how Bush was called dumb during the Bush/Kerry election, but turns out he recieved better grades than Kerry?  Naw, you go google it.

     

    Oh, and while we are at it, let's drift back to the thread:  Nixon was never impeached.

    [/QUOTE]

    The few people who discussed McCain's status does not compare with the depth and scope of the idiot birther movement.  And no one challenged whether Bush actually attended his schools.  No one offered him $5 million dollars to prove that he earned his degrees.  You can pretend there is an equivalency in this issue between the parties, but you would be wrong.  There are many more kooks on the right who are seeking to "prove" he is not American enough and not entitled to his professional credentials.  The Black guy can't possibly be where he is at without some cheating involved...

    And I never said Nixon was impeached.  That was somebody else.

    [/QUOTE]

    I nevber said they were equivalent, but you denied there was ever concern on anyone's part.  You are deaf, dumb and blind to everything other than blaming Bush for everything.

     

Share