NRA=GOP

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from ComingLiberalCrackup. Show ComingLiberalCrackup's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    AlleyCat=despicable moron

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    Not Now Folks !

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Firewind. Show Firewind's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    The NRA's role here may be about to be reduced to kibitzing, at least for a time, eclipsed as the spotlight shifts to the scenario at the very broken Lanza home.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    If you need a license to get married, drive a car or catch a fish...

    ...then you should need a license to own or carry a gun.

    "Gun control" is a misnomer.  The goal should be "gun identification".

    The 'right' to own guns should not trump the interests of public safety.  It's not the NRA's fault that they are more effective at framing the debate on their terms. 

    The rest of us are to blame for not challenging them more forthrightly on their arguments in public.

    Disclosure: I own guns, but I refuse to join the NRA.

     

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    Disclosure: I own guns, but I refuse to join the NRA.

     

    Of course you do. The left always thinks that everyone else needs to be controlled and that they're the only ones qualified to do the controlling.

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    Serious question for conservatives - how would you feel about addressing this issue through ammunition restrictions?  Maybe make rubber bullets and shock rounds readily available, but lethal ammo very difficult or expensive?  Maybe make an exception for hunting rifles?

    Guns would still be effective for hunting, sport & self-defense, but you minimize the risk of accidental fatalities.  

    Thoughts?

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

    Disclosure: I own guns, but I refuse to join the NRA.

     

     

    Of course you do. The left always thinks that everyone else needs to be controlled and that they're the only ones qualified to do the controlling.

     



    Like on abortion rights... oops. 

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    Like on abortion rights... oops.

    Bad analogy Reubin. As far as I know the strong anti-abortion people would never consider abortion as an option for themselves. Also, I know it's liberal dogma that the anti-abortion crowd wants to "control womens bodies" but I know for a fact they most of them could care less about that, they just want to prevent killing babies. No matter how you want to spin it that's how they look at it. That's a long way from the usual liberal attitide of "we know what's best for you."

     

     

     

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    In response to 12-Angry-Men's comment:

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

    Bad analogy Reubin. As far as I know the strong anti-abortion people would never consider abortion as an option for themselves. Also, I know it's liberal dogma that the anti-abortion crowd wants to "control womens bodies" but I know for a fact they most of them could care less about that, they just want to prevent killing babies. No matter how you want to spin it that's how they look at it. That's a long way from the usual liberal attitide of "we know what's best for you." 




    Are you freakin serious?

     

    So that pro-life whacko wingnut doctor who ran for a US representative position from Tennesee (?) who pushed his mistress to have an abortion in Georgia because the laws were less restrictive- the same laws, mind you, that this fvcking piece of shiite helped pass in his own state as a state rep....That was excusable to you freakin idiots.

     

    My gawd, how much of a sanctimonious pieceofshit does someone have to be, in the wingnut party, to be callled out on it?

     

    Just like your bullshiite "Sunday links"; you're a fvcking ignorant ideaologue who spouts the latest echo chamber baloney. And you do it with 'chocolate' on your nose-to-rectum face.

     

    Just shut the freak up already.

    The only thing you do is, every Sunday you regurgitate that wingnut diarhea and when confronted with the obvious bullshiite factor you run like a fvcking coward!!!!

     

    Shut up!!!!




    Angry:  I've noticed a significant uptick in your anger as expressed through the written word through all posts . It is not healthy for you, nor conducive to discussion/debate.  Why don't you take a time out?

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from StalkingButler. Show StalkingButler's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    Angry:  I've noticed a significant uptick in your anger as expressed through the written word through all posts . It is not healthy for you, nor conducive to discussion/debate.  Why don't you take a time out?

     

    It's funny that you should mention that. Anecdotally, I've noticed an sharp uptick in the anger level amongst liberals in general on my twitter feed. Assuming it's true, I wonder if it's in reaction to the events at Sandy Hook or if there's something else going on. Curious.

     

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from FaolanofEssex. Show FaolanofEssex's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    Angry:  I've noticed a significant uptick in your anger as expressed through the written word through all posts . It is not healthy for you, nor conducive to discussion/debate.  Why don't you take a time out?

     

     

    It's funny that you should mention that. Anecdotally, I've noticed an sharp uptick in the anger level amongst liberals in general on my twitter feed. Assuming it's true, I wonder if it's in reaction to the events at Sandy Hook or if there's something else going on. Curious.

     



    People should be angry. They should be very angry. Angry and disgusted. If your not angry then your not clued in.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    In response to FaolanofEssex's comment:

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    Angry:  I've noticed a significant uptick in your anger as expressed through the written word through all posts . It is not healthy for you, nor conducive to discussion/debate.  Why don't you take a time out?

     

     

    It's funny that you should mention that. Anecdotally, I've noticed an sharp uptick in the anger level amongst liberals in general on my twitter feed. Assuming it's true, I wonder if it's in reaction to the events at Sandy Hook or if there's something else going on. Curious.

     



    People should be angry. They should be very angry. Angry and disgusted. If your not angry then your not clued in.



    Angry's anger is not a righteous anger.  It is a sick anger.  He needs a time out.

    Liberals in general are angry and violent, particularly when confronted with the failures of their policies and thought process.  Sorry, but that it the truth.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: NRA=GOP

    In response to StalkingButler's comment:

     

    Disclosure: I own guns, but I refuse to join the NRA.

     

     

    Of course you do. The left always thinks that everyone else needs to be controlled and that they're the only ones qualified to do the controlling.

     




    I didn't say that.  You did.

    But if we can't control the guns due to our 2nd Amt., then we must control the circumstances which may allow something like this to occur.

    As for myself, I have no criminal record or history of mental illness (though some on the right would point to my perceived liberalism as such).  My guns are licensed and registered with my local police dept.

    So, what's your point?

     

     
Sections
Shortcuts