Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from massmoderateJoe. Show massmoderateJoe's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    all Republicans become atheists in retaliation.

     

     

    ________________________________________________________________

     

     

    We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries — we must claim its promise. That is how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure — our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That's what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.



    No more like throwing up in their mouth.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    I have always agreed with creating more green energy as long as it's done intelligently and not just cherry picked donors given taxpayer hand outs for bad business plans!

    We MUST keep expanding oil production and using coal for energy until a viable clean energy source is feasible as a national source of energy!

    To do otherwise is just irresponsible!

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    Judgement of science?

     

    In the 70's, the science was global cooling.

    In the 90's the science became global warming.

     In the 2000's, when scientists couldn't figure it out whether the planet was cooling OR warming, it became climate change, covering all bets.

    I tell you what.  When the science becomes settled, I'll sign on.

    Until then, I'll continue to act on God's expectation of man's stewardship of the planet for the benefit of people, ie. use the resources wisely for the benefit of man.

     

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from tvoter. Show tvoter's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    The Lord God commands it!

    [/QUOTE]


    That's what ya'll call Obama now? scarey!!

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from miscricket. Show miscricket's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

    all Republicans become atheists in retaliation.

     

     

    ________________________________________________________________

     

     

    We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries — we must claim its promise. That is how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure — our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That's what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.

     

    GodLovesUganda



    +1

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from skeeter20. Show skeeter20's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:

     

    In response to Newtster's comment:

    The earth has been warmer with jungles at the poles and colder with ice covering a large portion of the earth. Trying to control global warming (or whatever it is supposed to be called nowadays) by controlling man-made C02 emissions is a JOKE. It is for the power hungry nanny-state control freaks. It won't work. It will kill the economy.




     

    The Lord God commands it!

     



    More poooop throwing. Do you have a reasoned argument? F no because you operate on faith when it comes to this topic.

     




    No, he doesn't.

     

    the "science" seems to be re-settled every six months or so, so let's just wait him out.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from ComingLiberalCrackup. Show ComingLiberalCrackup's posts

    Re: Obama finds winning argument against Republicans,

    "Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms"

    Demagogue much? .Deaths globally in 2012 from natural disasters were 90% below the longterm average.

    The online, eco-leftist TAZ from Berlin has an article about reinsurer Munich Re’s Natural Catastrophe Statistics 2012 report on weather and natural disasters, released yesterday. 2012 was a year of few deaths and relatively little damage from natural disasters worldwide.2012′s “total damages of $160 billion was below the long-term average. And foremost ‘only’ 9500 people died in 2012 from storms, floods and earthquakes - far less than the 106,000 in an average year.” That’s a huge drop of 90%! So all the dramatic stories about deadly weather extremes we’ve been hearing for months was mostly hype.

    The Munich Re report said it was a “low-damage year”, with most of the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy and drought in the USA. Good news came from developing countries, where, according to the TAZ, “there were few catastrophes”.

     

Share