Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    "Let me guess: the delay to this point is a conspiracy to distract America from whatever the most recent bad thing that happened on the planet Earth was."

     

    Be careful....someone might accuse you of trolling : )

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to FortySixAndTwo's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Be careful....someone might accuse you of trolling : )

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Well what can you do? People say all sorts of stupid BS here.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Couldn't agree more.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ComingLiberalCrackup. Show ComingLiberalCrackup's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    "President Obama vowed swift action to bring the perpetrators to justice." 


    Hey, the obscure idiot who created a YouTube video went right to jail....


    And even though they waited over a year for Obama to approve this, they acted quickly now because ...they were afraid someone was going to kill the suspect?


    But the President deserves great credit, as usual, after waiting for 2 1/2 years...why? Because there are conspiracy theorists out there...and that explains that...

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "President Obama vowed swift action to bring the perpetrators to justice." 

    Hey, the obscure idiot who created a YouTube video went right to jail....

    And even though they waited over a year, they acted quickly now because ...they were afraid someone was going to kill the suspect?

    But the President deserves great credit, as usual, after waiting for 2 1/2 years...why? Because there are conspiracy theorists out there...and that explains that...

    [/QUOTE]

    Had W still been in Office, we would have invaded Algeria and his talking heads would be on TV explaning how capturing the mastermind behind the Bengahzi attack wasn't important.

    The best way to protect Americans from Terrorist attacks is to actually get the guys involved in the attacks.  Not to use the attacks as an excuse to invade some country with oil - oil that won't even get to the US and only benefits the Americans drilling for the oil.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    There's that crystal ball again.....

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from babytut. Show babytut's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "President Obama vowed swift action to bring the perpetrators to justice." 

    Hey, the obscure idiot who created a YouTube video went right to jail....

    And even though they waited over a year, they acted quickly now because ...they were afraid someone was going to kill the suspect?

    But the President deserves great credit, as usual, after waiting for 2 1/2 years...why? Because there are conspiracy theorists out there...and that explains that...

    [/QUOTE]

    Had W still been in Office, we would have invaded Algeria and his talking heads would be on TV explaning how capturing the mastermind behind the Bengahzi attack wasn't important.

    The best way to protect Americans from Terrorist attacks is to actually get the guys involved in the attacks.  Not to use the attacks as an excuse to invade some country with oil - oil that won't even get to the US and only benefits the Americans drilling for the oil.

    [/QUOTE]

    wait, there was a terrorist attack?  I thought it was guys out for a walk after watching a you tube video?

    well, what difference at this point does it make?  dude, it was like 2-years ago.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from babytut. Show babytut's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]wait, there was a terrorist attack?  I thought it was guys out for a walk after watching a you tube video?[/QUOTE]

    It was an "act of terror" planned because of the video. (The guy they just captured previously said as much.) I'm not sure what's so difficult about the concept.

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    yes and you should believe him.  but don`t believe brett baer, jim rosen, american patriot pilots, etc

    believe the terrorist

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from FortySixAndTwo. Show FortySixAndTwo's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to babytut's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]wait, there was a terrorist attack?  I thought it was guys out for a walk after watching a you tube video?[/QUOTE]

    It was an "act of terror" planned because of the video. (The guy they just captured previously said as much.) I'm not sure what's so difficult about the concept.

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    yes and you should believe him.  but don`t believe brett baer, jim rosen, american patriot pilots, etc

    believe the terrorist

     

    [/QUOTE]

    ha ha ha

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from ComingLiberalCrackup. Show ComingLiberalCrackup's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment:


    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    "President Obama vowed swift action to bring the perpetrators to justice." 


    Hey, the obscure idiot who created a YouTube video went right to jail....


    And even though they waited over a year, they acted quickly now because ...they were afraid someone was going to kill the suspect?


    But the President deserves great credit, as usual, after waiting for 2 1/2 years...why? Because there are conspiracy theorists out there...and that explains that...




    Had W still been in Office, we would have invaded Algeria and his talking heads would be on TV explaning how capturing the mastermind behind the Bengahzi attack wasn't important.


    The best way to protect Americans from Terrorist attacks is to actually get the guys involved in the attacks.  Not to use the attacks as an excuse to invade some country with oil - oil that won't even get to the US and only benefits the Americans drilling for the oil.


    [/QUOTE]


    Still believing the War for Oil mantra? So "moonbat 2006" ish.....

    Had W been in office, the liberals would be screeching about the poor terrorist suspect being tortured, and did the poor innocent farmer get his Miranda rights and an ACLU lawyer....libs would be wailing about "rendition" and how it is illegal to "kidnap" this poor fellow...

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Sistersledge. Show Sistersledge's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    Crankup don't you believe in due process of the law ?

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hansoribrother. Show Hansoribrother's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    What a coincidence! 

    Obama provides aid to terrorists in Syria

    Obama provides aid to terrorists in Palestine

    Obama talking to terrorist sponsoring Iran to help them get the bomb and invade Iraq

    Finally, he brings in the big one! He is on our side after all??  Just as disaster is about to befall and he has to cancel his next golf outing ISIS is on verge of entering Baghdad.

     

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hansoribrother. Show Hansoribrother's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]wait, there was a terrorist attack?  I thought it was guys out for a walk after watching a you tube video?[/QUOTE]

    It was an "act of terror" planned because of the video. (The guy they just captured previously said as much.) I'm not sure what's so difficult about the concept.

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Why do you cling to that? If he went out for the next two weeks blaming the whole incident on a video, what difference does it make to parse words about that one utterance? Seems irrelevant.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from ComingLiberalCrackup. Show ComingLiberalCrackup's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    "It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so."

    The terrorist leader said this in an interview...and he has not been in hiding....so if he has credibility as the leader of the Benghazi attack, why,  again,  do we wait 2 1/2 years before getting him?

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from babytut. Show babytut's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]yes and you should believe him.[/QUOTE]

     

     

    If you think the terrorist truthfully admitted to the attack but lied when he said he did it because of the video, how do you manage to get out the front door in the morning?

     

    Wife ties the shoes for you?

    [/QUOTE]

    if you think obambi, clinton, and rice told the truth about the benghazi attack by al quaida, and that bush lied and people died (even though both of obambi's sec of states voted for the war in iraq), then how do you manage to touch the keyboard without wearing a helmet?

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from babytut. Show babytut's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Hansoribrother's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Why do you cling to that? If he went out for the next two weeks blaming the whole incident on a video,

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so.

     

     

    But you and babytut seem to think that the terrorist leader is lying to back up Obama's claims that it was because of a video.

     

    Seriously...seek help

    [/QUOTE]

    hansori, we need to believe and put our trust in the terrorists, don't you get it?

    american heroes and patriots be dammned.  bring us al quaida for the truth

    talk about the need for help.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from BilltheKat. Show BilltheKat's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so."

    The terrorist leader said this in an interview...and he has not been in hiding....so if he has credibility as the leader of the Benghazi attack, why,  again,  do we wait 2 1/2 years before getting him?

    [/QUOTE]

    Because he's a nutbag terrorist pushing your buttons and now you're dancing like his little tool. Why did Bush leave getting Osama to Obama?

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from babytut. Show babytut's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    if you think obambi, clinton, and rice told the truth about the benghazi attack by al quaida, and that bush lied and people died (even though both of obambi's sec of states voted for the war in iraq), then how do you manage to touch the keyboard without wearing a helmet?

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


     

     

    1. I never said that Bush lied and people died. Lying about what a perceived opponent said was a typical jmel.....  is one of your typical moves.

     

    2. The CIA talking points memo said it was spontaneous and result of the video, and that this was just a working theory. That's the same thing the Obama administration told America. The memo and statements by Rice were posted at length in the last thread you lied about this.

     

    3. I didn't think you were capable or honest enough to respond with an explanation of why on earth the terrorist leader would truthfully admit to planning the attack but lie about planning it over the video.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    oh perfect, here we go.  you get your butt kicked and look like a moron and here comes the imposter stuff again.  i saw other whackjobs like you calling reaganfan and others jme last week.  i can't wait to see this jme person.   is that what's done here?  start losing, scream imposter.

    the cia talking points were changed over 10 times and never said "result of a video".

    you should never mention the words "honest enough" as you are living a big, fantasy, lie.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from ronreganfan. Show ronreganfan's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]wait, there was a terrorist attack?  I thought it was guys out for a walk after watching a you tube video?[/QUOTE]

    It was an "act of terror" planned because of the video. (The guy they just captured previously said as much.) I'm not sure what's so difficult about the concept. 

    [/QUOTE]

    You believe that, don't you?

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so."

    The terrorist leader said this in an interview...and he has not been in hiding....so if he has credibility as the leader of the Benghazi attack, why,  again,  do we wait 2 1/2 years before getting him?

    [/QUOTE]

    We could have gone in 2 1/2 years ago, but how many more US lives would have been lost?  If you've been following what's been going on in Benghazi the past few weeks - Libyan troops have been fighting Benghazi militias.  The loss of life and civilian casualties - they are all internal to Libya, instead of on US hands.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from ronreganfan. Show ronreganfan's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to slomag's comment:


    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    "It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so."


    The terrorist leader said this in an interview...and he has not been in hiding....so if he has credibility as the leader of the Benghazi attack, why,  again,  do we wait 2 1/2 years before getting him?




    We could have gone in 2 1/2 years ago, but how many more US lives would have been lost?  If you've been following what's been going on in Benghazi the past few weeks - Libyan troops have been fighting Benghazi militias.  The loss of life and civilian casualties - they are all internal to Libya, instead of on US hands.


    [/QUOTE]

    Does Obama only "pursue justice" when it is politically advantageous to do so?

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to babytut's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    if you think obambi, clinton, and rice told the truth about the benghazi attack by al quaida, and that bush lied and people died (even though both of obambi's sec of states voted for the war in iraq), then how do you manage to touch the keyboard without wearing a helmet?

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


     

     

    1. I never said that Bush lied and people died. Lying about what a perceived opponent said was a typical jmel.....  is one of your typical moves.

     

    2. The CIA talking points memo said it was spontaneous and result of the video, and that this was just a working theory. That's the same thing the Obama administration told America. The memo and statements by Rice were posted at length in the last thread you lied about this.

     

    3. I didn't think you were capable or honest enough to respond with an explanation of why on earth the terrorist leader would truthfully admit to planning the attack but lie about planning it over the video.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    oh perfect, here we go.  you get your butt kicked and look like a moron and here comes the imposter stuff again.  i saw other whackjobs like you calling reaganfan and others jme last week.  i can't wait to see this jme person.   is that what's done here?  start losing, scream imposter.

    the cia talking points were changed over 10 times and never said "result of a video".

    you should never mention the words "honest enough" as you are living a big, fantasy, lie.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    They said "result of events in Cairo".  It's a very straight line to the video.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to ronreganfan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ComingLiberalCrackup's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    "It was planned because of a video. The terrorist leader said so."

    The terrorist leader said this in an interview...and he has not been in hiding....so if he has credibility as the leader of the Benghazi attack, why,  again,  do we wait 2 1/2 years before getting him?

    [/QUOTE]

    We could have gone in 2 1/2 years ago, but how many more US lives would have been lost?  If you've been following what's been going on in Benghazi the past few weeks - Libyan troops have been fighting Benghazi militias.  The loss of life and civilian casualties - they are all internal to Libya, instead of on US hands.

    [/QUOTE]

    Does Obama only "pursue justice" when it is0politically advantageous to do so?

    [/QUOTE]

    Maybe - this does line up well with the mid-terms.  But good luck convincing the American People of that when this guy with zero ties to Al Qaeda is prattling on and on about insults to Mohammed from now until the trial.  The last neo-con narrative has unraveled.  How many headlines will read 'all about the video'?

     

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from high-road. Show high-road's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to ronreganfan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Does Obama only "pursue justice" when it is0politically advantageous to do so?

    [/QUOTE]


    Ya, he just waits until he needs a distraction from some other crazy wingnut conspiracy ... and only then does he get the guy.

    He's the most nefarious dictator ... or is it incompentent fool this week ... in US history.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from ronreganfan. Show ronreganfan's posts

    Re: Obama refuses to capture Benghazi ringleader

    In response to slomag's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to WhatNowDoYouWant's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to babytut's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    if you think obambi, clinton, and rice told the truth about the benghazi attack by al quaida, and that bush lied and people died (even though both of obambi's sec of states voted for the war in iraq), then how do you manage to touch the keyboard without wearing a helmet?

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


     

     

    1. I never said that Bush lied and people died. Lying about what a perceived opponent said was a typical jmel.....  is one of your typical moves.

     

    2. The CIA talking points memo said it was spontaneous and result of the video, and that this was just a working theory. That's the same thing the Obama administration told America. The memo and statements by Rice were posted at length in the last thread you lied about this.

     

    3. I didn't think you were capable or honest enough to respond with an explanation of why on earth the terrorist leader would truthfully admit to planning the attack but lie about planning it over the video.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    oh perfect, here we go.  you get your butt kicked and look like a moron and here comes the imposter stuff again.  i saw other whackjobs like you calling reaganfan and others jme last week.  i can't wait to see this jme person.   is that what's done here?  start losing, scream imposter.

    the cia talking points were changed over 10 times and never said "result of a video".

    you should never mention the words "honest enough" as you are living a big, fantasy, lie.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    They said "result of events in Cairo".  It's a very straight line to the video.

    [/QUOTE]

    The Bengazi attack was not because of the video.  How many times do we have to tell you that?

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share