Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    Movement conservativism's echo chamber of choice strikes again.

    And conservatives still wonder why they have a problem attracting female voters at election time....

     

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    These are the same conservative nitwits who don't want to pay teachers as the professionals they are...

    ...and have stigmatized teaching for decades as a job unsuitable for true, manly men...at least not men who want to support a family...and NO WAY suitable for homosexual men.

    Besides, this author is a moron.  SHES does not even have a grade 6, so therefore "husky 12 year old boys" don't really exist there.

    I'm waiting for one of them to advocate using the special needs students as a buffer zone so as to protect the "normal" kids.  (Oh right, they don't want to fund special needs education or learning development testing, either...)

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Honestly though, the world would be a better place if everyone involved in that article's production jumped off a tall, tall bridge.

    [/QUOTE]

    I disagree.  Keep them around as designated representatives of their blessed movement.

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from massmoderateJoe. Show massmoderateJoe's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    The article is BS; but what if there were a couple of men like the let's roll story.  Two guys charging from diffferent directions might have made a difference and lessened the blood shed that day.  I don't like the tone of the national review story; but that doesn't make we can't think what if.

    The real story of flight 93 'Let's roll...'

    Todd Beamer was a religious family man. Mark Bingham was gay, a PR executive and a keen sportsman. Cockpit recordings from 11 September now show how these two very different men became heroes of America 

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    In response to massmoderateJoe's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    The article is BS; but what if there were a couple of men like the let's roll story.  Two guys charging from diffferent directions might have made a difference and lessened the blood shed that day.  I don't like the tone of the national review story; but that doesn't make we can't think what if.

    [/QUOTE]

    Fantasies aside...

    The problem with this article is not the "tone".  The entire premise is flawed, the reasoning is idiotic, and the conclusions are blatantly sexist and insulting to all females, much less female teachers.

    Even worse, it totally belittles a genuine act of heroism on behalf of the (female) principal.

     

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from massmoderateJoe. Show massmoderateJoe's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    In response to WhatDoYouWantNow's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to massmoderateJoe's comment:

    Two guys charging from diffferent directions might have made a difference



    I'm sorry but did the Flight 93 hijakers have an AR-15 and a handgun? Any weapon? No. They had box cutters, right? Pretty much utility blades with a 1 inch (if that) blade that isn't even necessarily all that sharp?

     

     

     

    The situations were completely different.

    The female principal charged an AR-15. The predictable result followed.

     

    The same would be true of a male. Even if he played football thirty years ago.

    [/QUOTE]

    Yes much different; but you can only aim at one person at a time.  An elementary school traget is the softest target you can find regardless of staff; which why this deranged coward chose it.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Firewind. Show Firewind's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    Oh, this one's awful.  It's surprising that ms didn't deliver it.  Let's keep it bumped to the top for a while so he gets another crack at it.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from undead. Show undead's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

     Whoever wrote that article hates men. There's no other way anyone could write that article.

     IMHO, when it comes to who's able to better defend or who's deadlier, it's a 50/50 split. Everyone has the ability to do good and evil, and some are better at controlling themselves than others. It's not about girls vs. boys, it's about individuals controlling themselves.

     The principle did what she could knowing she was going to die to save as many people as she could. That's the standard definition of a hero, and she deserves the title. If you don't think so, ask yourself if you would've done the same. Careful, though, you may not like the answer you give yourself.

     

     

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from MattyScornD. Show MattyScornD's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    In response to TFefio's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Yeah,but I think back to the Democratic platform who waged a phony war on women stating they were incapable of supplying their own birth control pills. So who's worse? Can't have it both ways. 

    [/QUOTE]


    False equivalence alert.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Reubenhop. Show Reubenhop's posts

    Re: Only the fine patriots at the National Review have the cojones to ID the real culprit in the Sandy Hook shooting: women

    In response to TFefio's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Yeah,but I think back to the Democratic platform who waged a phony war on women stating they were incapable of supplying their own birth control pills. So who's worse? Can't have it both ways. 

    [/QUOTE]

    So the majority of women who voted for that platform are ignorant dupes... 

    You may have a future on the National Review.

     

Share