This post has been removed.
Petraeus destroys Republicans fake Benghazi Scandal
Re: Petraeus destroys Republicans fake Benghazi Scandal
posted at 11/17/2012 11:14 PM EST
In response to jmel's comment:
In response to slomag's comment:
In response to jmel's comment:
In response to Reubenhop's comment:
Can you read this?:
David H. Petraeus, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, told lawmakers on Friday that classified intelligence reports revealed that the deadly assault on the American diplomatic mission in Libya was a terrorist attack, but that the administration refrained from saying it suspected that the perpetrators of the attack were Al Qaeda affiliates and sympathizers to avoid tipping off the groups.
Of course I can read it. It`s a great excuse. "Tipping off what groups"? BWaaaaaaaaa! This is what you`re hanging your hat on? After testimony stating clearly that documents were "tampered with" and "terrorists" and "al Qaeda" were removed and deliberately lied about,..........this is what you believe? A Y K M ?
This is what Petraeus said. He is much closer to the situation than any right tighty fool was. An you have no information to the contrary. So you are believing rumors from people away fromn the wsituation and with obvious political agendas.
By the way, how are your polls looking for the election? Still think Romney is a slam dunk?
You believe what you want to believe based on ideology alone. Fact are completely secondary.
Did you read the 2 links you stupid b a stard? Are you this f vcking dumb? Are you going to continue the "polls" crap like a 12-year old?
Let me help you stupid............Patreaus testified that from day 1........check that......HOUR 1, he KNEW it was al Qaeda. The documents and talking points were changed. Changed by people as high up as the Incompetent himself.......
Can you read? Do you watch the news? And, I don`t mean FOX. I mean CNN, USA Today, all day today. Are you drunk?
Are you not seeing that every media outlet is reporting this? You are completely wrong. go watch the news, read a paper, sober up............and then apologize for being a moron will ya?
I guarantee you Petraeus never said anything about Al Qaeda. He said Ansar al Sharia, and Peter King translated that into "Al Qaeda linked militants" when he went running from a closed door hearing to the nearest microphone.
And guess what? The Washington Post is now reporting that it all started with the video ...
The Washington Post reported that, since the attack, the CIA and other intelligence analysts have settled on a hybrid view of the attack, suggesting that the Cairo protest sparked militants in Libya, who quickly mobilized the assault on U.S. facilities in Benghazi. Details about possible al-Qaeda links were not in initial talking points used by both Petraeus and UN Ambassador Susan Rice because they were preliminary and based on classified sources, intelligence officials said.
Do you guys just make stuff up? I know it`s Saturday and people are busy with other things but, turn on your TV, pick up the paper, look at the links (some from this morning) that I`ve posted in this very thread. Patreaus said EXACTLY "al Qaeda", from DAY ONE......in fact, within hours of the attack.
Stop the lies!
Are you even reading your own posts? An "al Qaeda sympathizing group" is not Al Qaeda. Ansar al Sharia is not Al Qaeda. They cared more about a youtube video than they did Osama bin Laden. Your narrative is done. Your coverup angle is history. Susan Rice has been exonerated. Your "stand down" report has been edited (withoug a correction!) to remove glaring inaccuracies. Do you know how damning that is to a news agency's credibility - to edit an article without issuing a correction?
It's over - you fought a good fight, but now you're just swinging at shadows. It's time to put it all to rest.